Maryam Afzali1, Hu Cheng1, and Sharlene Newman1
1Department of psychological and brain sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States
Synopsis
Many
denoising techniques have been proposed in an attempt to remedy the low
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of diffusion weighted images (DWI) [1-3], especially with high b values. It
was shown that denoising might benefit DWI data processing such as fiber
tracking [4]. However, denoising is not widely
accepted as a mandatory step in the preprocessing of DWI data due to little
well documented study about the effect of denoising. In this work, we tested if
denoising can overcome the low SNR in tensor based diffusion analysis and fiber
tracking.
Introduction
Many
denoising techniques have been proposed in an attempt to remedy the low
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of diffusion weighted images (DWI) [1-3], especially with high b values. It
was shown that denoising might benefit DWI data processing such as fiber
tracking [4]. However, denoising is not widely
accepted as a mandatory step in the preprocessing of DWI data due to little
well documented study about the effect of denoising. In this work, we tested if
denoising can overcome the low SNR in tensor based diffusion analysis and fiber
tracking. Methods
The
DWI data were acquired for one human subject on a 3 T Prisma scanner (Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen Germany) using the HCP Lifespan protocol with a 64-ch head
coil (1.5 mm isotropic voxel size, 80 directions, b = 1000 and 2500 s/mm2,
TR = 5000 ms, multiband acceleration factor = 4.). Three DWI datasets were acquired by changing
the echo time (TE) to obtain images with different SNR. The TE was 85 ms, 120
ms, and 150 ms respectively.
For
tractograpy study, a phantom of 26 white matter bundles provided by Tractometer
was used as ground truth. The diffusion MRI signal was simulated using Fiberfox
tool implemented in the diffusion module of MITK (http://mitk.org)
b = 1000 s/mm2, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 22, 32, and 44. Each diffusion
dataset contains 128 gradient directions and three b0 images.
Denoising
was performed with the Matlab toolbox using the LPCA option [4]. For human
data, denoised and undenoised images were processed in FSL for eddy current
correction and tensor fitting. The fiber tracking was performed using ExploreDTI
[5] with the constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) algorithm [6].
The
cortical region of the brain was parcellated into 278 ROIs. Number of fibers
between any pair of ROIs were computed to form a connectome matrix. The
connectome was binarized and compared against the ground truth binarized
connectome. The binarization entailed thresholding the connectome by removing connections
if the number of fibers is smaller than a certain number. The false positive
rate (FPR, ratio of spurious connections to the total number of true
connections) and the false negative rate (FNR, ratio of missing connections to
the total number of true connections) were computed respectively. Results
The
FA maps of an exemplary slice are shown in Fig. 1 for three datasets with
different SNR. The FA maps derived from the data with the same SNR look
similar, despite that the denoised data yielded smoother maps. Distinctive
difference can be noticed between TE 85 ms and higher TEs such as in the cortical
region and the thalamus. The mean diffusivity maps of the same slice are shown
in Fig. 2 for all conditions. Again, there is little difference between
denoised and un-denoised data, but a dramatic difference between images with
different TEs. These differences can be examined at a different angle with the
histogram of the whole brain (Fig. 3). Fig 3A shows the histogram of FA for all
conditions. The difference between denoised and un-denoised is smaller than the
difference between TEs. The peaks shift to lower end as the SNR goes lower. If
taking the lowest TE as the gold standard, denoising caused more bias in
addition to the effect of SNR. For the MD map, the main difference is caused by
SNR while the denoising has little effect.
For
tractography, the effect of denoising on the FNR is shown in Fig. 4. As
expected, the FNR goes up as the threshold of number of fibers increases, and higher
FNR is associated with lower SNR. Mixed effects of denoising on the FNR were
found. For SNR = 44, denoising resulted in slightly higher FNR, but for SNR =
22, denoising achieved lower FNR than un-denoised data. The effect of denoising
on the FNR is shown in Fig. 5, the FPR goes down as the threshold of number of
fibers increases, and lower FPR is associated with lower SNR. It should be
noted that here the denoising caused more FPR in all circumstances, indicating
that denoising leads to more spurious fibers. Discussion
Our
results with LPCA show that the primary benefit of denoising in tensor based
diffusion analysis is improving SNR in the tensor parameters. In fiber
tracking, denoising might help reducing the false negative rate at low SNR but
at the expense of increasing the false positive rate. It is critical to acquire
high SNR images in the first place. These findings are based on LPCA denoising
but a systematic examination of other denoising methods will be conducted.Acknowledgements
We
thank Center for Magnetic Resonance Research at University of Minnesota for the
multi-band diffusion pulse sequence.References
1- Jones
DK, et al. (2004) Squashing peanuts and smashing pumpkins: how noise
distorts diffusion-weighted MR data. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 52,
979–993.
2- Descoteaux
M, et al. (2008) Impact of Rician
adapted non-local means filtering on HARDI. MICCAI 2008; 11: 122–130.
3- McGraw, Tim, et al. "Variational denoising
of diffusion weighted MRI." Inverse
Problems and Imaging 35.4
(2009): 625.
4- J.
V. Manjon, et al. Diffusion
Weighted Image Denoising using overcomplete Local PCA. PLoS ONE 8(9): e73021.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073021
5- Leemans, A., et al. "ExploreDTI: a
graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR
data." 17th Annual
Meeting of Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. Vol. 209. 2009.
6- Jeurissen, Ben, et al. "Probabilistic
fiber tracking using the residual bootstrap with constrained spherical deconvolution." Human brain mapping32.3 (2011):
461-479.