Robert Bergen1,2 and Lawrence Ryner1,2
1Physics & Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2Medical Physics, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Synopsis
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is routinely
used in prostate cancer assessment, but suffers from image distortions primarily
due to the tissue-air interface at the rectal cavity. Readout-segmented echo
planar imaging (RESOLVE) improves image quality through segmented acquisition
of k-space, increasing bandwidth in the phase direction. However, distortions
of several millimeters may still exist in RESOLVE images. This study quantified
distortions in a prostate phantom by varying the number of RESOLVE segments and
using field mapping correction techniques. Field mapping correction decreased
image distortion by 28% compared to the 7-segment RESOLVE scan.
Purpose
To assess the use of field map corrections in conventional diffusion-weighted
echo planar imaging (EPI), and RESOLVE, using a DWI phantom.Method
The prostate and rectal anatomy was simulated by inserting a
cylindrical air cavity with a 1-inch diameter into a container filled with
water. A spherical container with a 38mm diameter was filled with water to
simulate the prostate. By increasing the angle of the cylindrical cavity with respect
to the main field, the inhomogeneity could be increased and image distortion could be controlled.
Scans
were performed on a 3T Siemens Verio MRI scanner. T2 images
were acquired at a FOV of 200x200 mm, slice thickness of 3mm, with a bandwidth
of 256 Hz/px and TE/TR = 96/5200ms. Axial DW-EPI images were acquired at a FOV of
220x187mm, slice thickness of 3.6mm, resolution of 160x120 with a phase bandwidth
of 11 Hz/px and 6 averages. RESOLVE images were acquired at the same settings
with 1 average, with the number of segments ranging from 7-21. Apparent
diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were calculated using b values of 0, 500 and
1000 mm2/s. Field mapping was calculated from gradient echo (GRE) images
acquired at echo times of 3.1 and 4.1ms using the same geometry and 4 averages.
Field mapping corrections followed the procedure outlined by Jezzard1. Distortions were assessed by measuring the smallest
diameter of the spherical volume in the phase encoding direction. Errors in distance measurements were assumed to be
0.7mm, which corresponds to half a pixel.Results
Images of the T2, EPI and RESOLVE images with the air
cavity angled 20 degrees to the main field are shown in Figure 1. The RESOLVE image
remains undistorted at 7 segments while the EPI image suffers from large
distortions. Images acquired with the air cavity angled 45 degrees to the main
field are shown in Figure 2. Following the field map correction approach
outlined in the previous section, a corrected EPI and corrected RESOLVE image
were generated, as shown in Figure 3. The prostate was contoured manually in
each image and these contours were overlaid on a perfect 38mm circle at cavity
angles of 20 and 45 degrees relative to the main field (Figure 4). The 7-segment
RESOLVE contour was distorted by 9.6mm and was reduced to 6.9mm with field
mapping, decreasing distortion by 28%.
Increasing the number of segments to reduce spatial distortion was
also investigated. 13-segment RESOLVE scans reduced distortions by only 7%
compared to 7-segment RESOLVE scans. The associated increase in scan time (5:34
min) was similar to that of the GRE acquisitions (6:04 min). The same experiment
was carried out for 21 segments, but no additional benefit was seen and distortion
reduction remained at 7%.Discussion
Diffusion MRI is routinely used for assessing tumour aggressiveness
in prostate cancer2-4. It is known that DW-EPI is susceptible
to image distortion due to its low bandwidth in the phase encoding direction.
This complicates its use in a MR-guided radiotherapy treatment setting, since
high geometric accuracy is required. Prostate DWI is particularly challenging
since the tissue-air interface at the rectal wall introduces local field
inhomogeneities5. As shown in Figure 3 and 4, RESOLVE greatly
reduces distortions compared to traditional DWI through a segmented
acquisition of k-space6, but still suffers from residual distortion
in some cases.
Our phantom simulates the rectum/prostate anatomy using a
cylindrical air cavity to represent rectal gas and a sphere to represent the
prostate. The simulated prostate was placed 7.5mm away from the rectal wall. For an infinite cylinder of air with its long axis parallel to the main
field, the field strength in water just outside the cavity remains unchanged.
Rotating the cavity out of alignment with the main field induces field
inhomogeneities outside the cavity, causing geometric distortion. Figure 5 shows a large inhomogeneity
at the bottom of the spherical volume as the cavity is rotated 45 degrees
relative to the main field.
We
have shown that field map correction techniques can reduce spatial distortion
of a 7-segment RESOLVE sequence by 28%. This
method was found to be more effective than increasing the number of segments.
Increasing the number of segments to 13 and higher only reduced distortion by 7%.Conclusion
Field map corrections for RESOLVE were shown to
be an effective technique for distortion correction in RESOLVE diffusion
weighted imaging. The increased geometric accuracy of these techniques can
potentially allow diffusion-weighted images to be fused with other MR or CT
images for radiotherapy treatment purposes. Patient studies will be carried out
in the future to further validate this method.Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the University of Manitoba for providing the funding for this project.
References
1Jezzard P, Balaban RS. Correction for geometric distortion in echo
planar images from B0 field variations. Magn Reson Med 1995;34(1):65-73.
2Guneyli S, Erdem CZ, Erdem LO. Magnetic resonance imaging of
prostate cancer. Clin Imaging 2016;40(4):601-609.
3Ueno Y, Tamada T, Bist V, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance
imaging: Current role in prostate cancer management. Int J Urol
2016;23(7):550-557.
4Turkbey B, Shah VP, Pang Y et al. Is apparent diffusion coefficient
associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on
3-T MR images? Radiology 2011;258:488-495.
5Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR
guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012; 1-12.
6Porter DA, Heidemann RM. High resolution diffusion-weighted imaging
using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging, parallel imaging and a
two-dimensional navigator-based reacquisition. Magn Res Med 2009;62(2):468-475.