Madeleine Daemen1,2, Aart J. Nederveen1, Jeroen A.L. Jeneson1,3, Gustav J. Strijkers4, and Adrianus J. Bakermans1
1Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2Biomedical NMR, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 3Neuroimaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 4Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Synopsis
Changes in the myocardial energy homeostasis
have been linked to decreases in cardiac pumping performance. Current MR
practice requires two consecutive recordings of 31P-MRS and 1H-MRI
to assess both aspects of heart physiology, with consequently long scan times,
considerable patient burden, and potentially a mismatch between data from
separate sessions. By efficiently interleaving 3D ISIS acquisitions for
localized 31P-MRS with short-axis cine 1H-MR imaging,
both myocardial energy status as well as left-ventricular ejection fraction could
be quantified from MR data that were acquired essentially simultaneously.
Purpose
This work aims to explore the feasibility of
interleaved acquisitions of 3D-localized 31P-MR spectra and cine 1H-MR
images of the human heart at 3 Tesla.Background
Changes in the myocardial energy homeostasis
have been linked to decreases in cardiac pumping performance.1 Therefore,
assessments of myocardial metabolism and function of the human heart are of
clinical value. Unique to MR, it provides a noninvasive window into myocardial
energy metabolism via phosphorous-31 MR spectroscopy (31P-MRS) of
high-energy phosphate metabolites (phosphocreatine, PCr; ATP) as well as heart
function via proton MR imaging (1H-MRI). Current MR practice
requires two consecutive recordings for such measurements, with consequently
long scan times, considerable patient burden, and potentially a mismatch
between data from separate sessions. Particularly, these issues may be
exacerbated in cardiac MR stress testing. Here, we explored the feasibility of
acquiring localized 31P-MR spectra and cine 1H-MR images
of the human heart in an interleaved2,3
fashion, such that both myocardial energy status and heart function can be
assessed essentially simultaneously. Methods
Experiments were conducted on a
Philips Ingenia 3.0 Tesla MR system (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The
Netherlands) equipped with a linearly-polarized 31P-MR surface
transmit/receive coil (∅ 14 cm, 51.8 MHz; Philips). For shimming and 1H-MRI,
the quadrature body coil was used (∅ 70 cm, 127.8 MHz). Cardiac data were
acquired in a healthy male volunteer (34 y/70 kg/1.75 m) lying supine in the MR
scanner with the 31P-MR surface coil carefully positioned over the
heart (Figure 1).
Interleaved MR
acquisitions: By
interleaving different scans, the idle time during long repetition times
typically used in 31P-MRS can be efficiently filled with 1H-MRI
acquisitions. Cardiac-triggered 3D image-selected in vivo spectroscopy (ISIS) was used to acquire localized 31P-MR
spectra of the heart (voxel size 120×80×80 mm3 enclosing the left and right
ventricle (Figure 1); number of averages 8 (= one 3D ISIS cycle); effective TR 9
heart beats; PCr on-resonance; bandwidth 2000 Hz; 1024 data points). During each effective TR
of 9 ECG R-R intervals between the ISIS averages, a left-ventricular short-axis
slice was imaged in 6 heart beats (Figure 2). These cine 1H-MRI
series were acquired with a balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP)
sequence (field of view 250×320 mm2; matrix 100×128; slice thickness
10 mm; voxel size 2.5×2.5×10 mm3; TR/TE 2.4/1.22 ms; flip angle 15°; number of
averages 1; 17 heart phases; retrospective ECG synchronization). Combined, a
stack of short-axis cine 1H-MRI series as well as a 31P-MR
spectrum were obtained from the heart within a total acquisition time of
approximately one minute during a free-breathing protocol.
Data analyses: Resonance peaks in the 31P-MR
spectrum were fitted to Gaussian line shapes in the time domain using AMARES in
jMRUI.4 The PCr resonance was used as an internal chemical shift reference
at 0.00 ppm. The γ- and α-ATP resonances were fitted with equal amplitudes and line
widths within each doublet and a J-coupling
constant of 17 Hz. Left-ventricular ejection fraction was quantified by manual
segmentation of the endocardial left-ventricular wall in the 1H-MR
images using Segment.5
Results
Figure 3 shows the single-voxel 3D
ISIS-localized 31P-MR spectrum obtained from the heart of a healthy
volunteer with one 3D ISIS cycle. Although the signal-to-noise ratio is low,
resonance peaks from the myocardial high-energy phosphate metabolites PCr and
ATP and erythrocyte 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) that are characteristic of
cardiac 31P-MR spectra can be distinguished. Myocardial energy
status, quantified via the PCr/γ-ATP ratio, was 2.70. During the TR idle time
window of 3D ISIS acquisitions, short-axis cine 1H-MR images were
acquired (Figure 4). Left-ventricular ejection fraction was 56.3%.Discussion
Until now, cardiac MR investigations have been
limited to either 31P-MRS or cine 1H-MR imaging in a
consecutive protocol. Here, we demonstrated the feasibility of acquiring localized 31P-MR
spectra and cine 1H-MR images of the human heart in an interleaved
fashion within a one-minute free-breathing protocol. At this time, low signal-to-noise
ratios and relatively poor image quality hamper any diagnostic interpretation
of the data. However, ongoing developments in MR hardware6 and RF
coil design7 are expected to improve data quality, enabling essentially simultaneous assessments of heart function and myocardial energy status with
this protocol of interleaved acquisitions. In particular, the approach
presented here would greatly benefit dynamic MR studies of the human heart,
e.g., during exercise or adenosine stress.8Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National
Institutes of Health (NIH grant HL072011).References
1. Tewari
SG, et al. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2016;94:162-75
2.
Meyerspeer M, et al. Magn Reson Med 2007;57;654-60
3.
Henningsson M, et al. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:692-96
4. Vanhamme
L, et al. J Magn Reson 1997;129:35-43
5.
Heiberg E, et al. BMC Med Imaging 2010;10:1
6. Löring J, et al. NMR Biomed 2016;29:709-20
7.
Bakermans AJ, et al. Proc ISMRM 2016;24:3518
8.
Dass S, et al. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1547-54