Akos Varga-Szemes1, Rob J van der Geest2, Carlo N De Cecco1, Taylor M Duguay1, U. Joseph Schoepf1, and Pal Suranyi1
1Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
Synopsis
Conventional
Look-Locker (LL)-based inversion time (TI) estimation prior to late gadolinium enhancement
(LGE) imaging has multiple limitations, including: the long breath-hold, the
collected images are in different cardiac phases, and the subjective TI
estimation. In this study we aimed to develop a quantitative T1 mapping-based
synthetic inversion recovery (IRsynth) approach allowing for the quantitative
determination of the optimal TI for LGE imaging. We showed in 40 patients that
the IRsynth method provides better quality of myocardial signal
nulling, retrospective TI selection, higher TI resolution, no need for further
LL correction or TI adjustment, and less operator dependence.
Purpose
Conventional
Look-Locker (LL)-based estimation of the optimal inversion time (TI) (“TI-scout”)
is a requirement prior to late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging to achieve
the appropriate image contrast especially when LGE images are acquired in a
magnitude fashion. The TI-scout sequence has multiple limitations, including: the
long breath-hold necessary, the collected images are in different cardiac
phases, and the overly subjective and user-dependent TI estimation. Therefore,
in this study we aimed to develop and test a quantitative T1-mapping-based synthetic
inversion recovery (IRsynth) approach1,2 allowing for the
calculation of the most optimal TI for LGE imaging.Methods
Forty consecutive patients (57±15 years, 23 male) referred
for myocardial viability evaluation underwent cardiovascular MRI on a 1.5T
system (MAGNETOM Avanto,
Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Twelve minutes after contrast
administration (0.1mmol/kg gadobenate-dimeglumine) conventional
TI-scout (LL, Field-of-view 300×256mm2;
slice thickness 8mm; acquisition matrix 192×104; spatial resolution 2.08×2.08mm2; TR/TE 2.5/1.1ms; Bandwidth
965Hz/pixel; and Flip angle 50°) and T1-mapping (modified LL IR; scheme
4(1)3(1)2; Field-of-view 300×256mm2; slice thickness 8mm;
acquisition matrix 196×128; spatial resolution
1.56×1.56mm2; TR/TE 2.6/1.1ms; Bandwidth 1085Hz/pixel; and Flip
angle 35°) acquisitions were performed in the 4-chamber view. LL and T1 image
sets were acquired in a random order and 2 subgroups were defined accordingly (Figure 1). In the LL group, T1-mapping
was performed first followed by the conventional LL acquisition. In the
Synthetic group, conventional LL was obtained before T1 mapping. In both groups
the second acquisition was used to estimate the optimal TI for LGE imaging in
order to reduce the time between the image set used for TI calculation and the
LGE acquisition. Based on the T1-maps, magnitude IRsynth images were
calculated in a TI range of 200-400 with 5ms increments real-time on the
scanner (Figure 2). The optimal TI
was determined from both LL and IRsynth images based on TI-Signal
intensity curves (Figure 1). Image
quality including the quality of nulling, the ability to differentiate LGE from
blood, and the ability to differentiate LGE from normal myocardium was
subjectively rated by two observers on a 3-point Likert scale. The quality of nulling
was also objectively measured based on the myocardial/background signal ratio
in the LGE images. The two groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and
Mann-Whitney tests.Results
Out
of the 40 patients enrolled in the study, LGE consistent with myocardial
infarct was observed in 21 (52.5%) subjects. The optimal TI was measured
significantly lower by the conventional LL approach compared to the IRsynth
technique (LL group: 259±50ms vs. 290±53ms, P<0.0218; Synthetic group:
248±21ms vs. 287±29ms, P<0.0001). The acquisition order did not influence
the value of optimal TI (LL group P=0.2540; Synthetic group P=0.8760). There
was significant difference between the TI estimated based on the LL
acquisition, and the TI actually applied for the LGE scan (259±50s vs. 285±52ms,
P=0.0021) due to the need to account for LL correction (“fudge factor”).
However, there was no difference between the TI estimated based on the IRsynth
image sets and the TI used for the LGE scans. Using the IRsynth-based
TI for LGE acquisition (n=21) provided significantly higher image quality
ratings compared to LL-based LGE (n=19) for the quality of nulling (2.4 [2.0-2.7]
vs. 1.8 [1.4-2.3], P=0.0044), however there was no difference in the ability to
differentiate LGE from blood (2.5 [2.2-2.8] vs. 2.6 [2.1-3.0], P=0.2415) or LGE
from normal myocardium (2.7 [2.3-3.0] vs. 2.5 [2.3-2.7], P=0.1194).
Myocardial/background signal intensity ratio was lower in the Synthetic group
compared to the LL group (1.2±0.4 vs. 2.4±1.1, P=0.0079).Discussion
Our
results indicate that T1-mapping based IRsynth imaging has the
potential to accurately measure the optimal TI for LGE imaging. Subjective and
objective image quality analysis showed that using the TI accurately determined
based on the IRsynth image set yields better quality of nulling. The
IRsynth method has multiple further advantages over the conventional LL
approach. The IRsynth technique provides higher TI resolution as
images can be generated at even 1ms intervals. This technique depends less on
the operator as the actual TI used for LGE imaging can be retrospectively
selected. Drawing regions of interest is more straightforward as all the images
in an IRsynth set are in the same cardiac phase. Further advantage
also reducing the subjectivity of the technique is that LL correction is
already built in the T1-fitting algorithm3, thus there is no need to
TI adjustment with the IRsynth technique, contrary to the
conventional LL technique.Conclusion
T1-based
IRsynth imaging provides objective, quantitative, and real-time prescription
of the optimal TI for LGE imaging; eliminating the need for LL correction and
the substantial operator dependence of the acquisition.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Xue H, Shah S, Greiser A, et al.
Motion correction for myocardial T1 mapping using image registration with synthetic
image estimation. Magn Reson Med 2012;67(6):1644-1655.
2. Varga-Szemes A, van der Geest RJ,
Spottiswoode BS, et al. Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement: Accuracy of T1
Mapping-based Synthetic Inversion-Recovery Imaging. Radiology 2016;278(2):374-382.
3. Kellman P,
Herzka DA, Hansen MS. Adiabatic inversion pulses for myocardial T1 mapping. Magn Reson Med 2014;71(4):1428-1434.