Time resolved 4D phase contrast (PC) MRI in mice is challenging and often susceptible to artifacts due to long scan times, ECG-gating and the rapid blood flow and cardiac motion of small rodents. To overcome several of these technical challenges we implemented a retrospectively self-gated 4D-PC radial UTE acquisition scheme and assessed its performance in healthy mice by comparing the results with those obtained with an ECG-triggered 4D-PC fast low angle shot (FLASH) sequence.
Purpose
Quantitative blood flow analysis using 4D time-resolved phase-contrast (4D-PC) MRI is a valuable tool for studying the cardiovascular system1,2. Applying 4D-PC-MRI to small animals at high field strengths remains technically challenging and has only recently been implemented by using a Cartesian gradient echo sequence3. In this work we present a 4D-PC-UTE acquisition strategy that uses the shortest possible echo- and repetition-times in combination with an efficient self-gating. The proposed technique was validated in both flow phantoms and healthy mouse hearts.Materials and Methods
A center-out cone by cone 3D-UTE imaging sequence was modified by including a four-point Hadamard flow encoding encoding scheme4,5. To extract a stable navigator signal from the center of k-space of the non-selectively excited 3D imaging volume two modifications were made: 1) constant z-spoiling to reduce fluctuations caused by old magnetization and 2) switching on the ADC 100 µs prior to the readout gradient to reduce digital filtering artifacts.
An intrinsic navigator signal was obtained from each acquired read-out by taking the last data point sampled before the start of the readout gradient. The resulting navigator function was then filtered using a Savitzky-Golay smoothing filter6 with a width of 90ms followed by peak detection to obtain cardiac cycle onsets. For respiration detection the original navigator function was smoothed with a broader filter of 400ms. To reconstruct cardiac cine frames a 15.5ms wide sliding-window-reconstruction7 was applied with a frame shift of 3.1ms (48 reconstructed cine). Image reconstruction was performed in MATLAB using state-of-the art regridding8.
Phantom: UTE-MRI measurements were performed on a home-built flow phantom3 with the following parameters: 0.5ms/5.0ms/1h45min TE/TR/TA and 2 averages. For comparison a Cartesian 3D-FLASH flow mapping sequence was used: 2.5ms/6.5ms/1h25min TE/TR/TA and 4 averages. Both sequences used: 32x32x32mm³ FOV and 200x200x200 matrix size.
In vivo: Measurements were performed in healthy mice (male, C57BL/6J, 6 months old) using a two-channel quadrature cryoprobe and either the FLASH sequence (n=5) with ECG- and respiratory gating or the 4D-PC-UTE sequence (n=5) with self-gating. An isotropic resolution of 230µm was acquired. The FLASH sequence used 25% readout Partial-Fourier, resulting in a TE/TR of 2.1ms/5.0ms acquiring 20 frames of the cardiac cycle with an effective TA between 1h35min and 1h55min. The UTE acquisition used TE/TR of 0.5ms/3.1ms and a fixed TA of 1h58min. All measurements were performed on a 9.4T Bruker BioSpec-USR 94/20 MR scanner.
1. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Kilner PJ, Longmore DB. The application of phase shifts in NMR for flow measurement. Magn Reson Med. 1990;14:230–2412.
2. Rebergen SA, van der Wall EE, Doornbos J, de Roos A. Magnetic resonance measurement of velocity and flow: Technique, validation, and cardiovascular applications. Am Heart J. 1993;126:1439 – 1456.3.
3. Bovenkamp PR, Brix T, Lindemann F, Holtmeier R, Abdurrachim D, Kuhlmann MT, Strijkers GJ, Stypmann J, Hinrichs KH, Hoerr V. Velocity mapping of the aortic flow at 9.4 T in healthy mice and mice with induced heart failure using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI (4D PC MRI). MAGMA. 2015;28:315–3274.
4. Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Darrow RD, Pelc NJ, Adams WJ, Ash SA. Simultaneous ac-quisition of phase-contrast angiograms and stationary-tissue images with Hadamard encoding of flow-induced phase shifts. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991;1:399–404.5.
5. Pelc NJ, Bernstein MA, Shimakawa A, Glover GH. Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991;1:405–4136.
6. Savitzky A, Golay MJE. Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. Anal Chem. 1964;36:1627–16397.
7. Riederer SJ, Tasciyan T, Farzaneh F, Lee JN, Wright RC, Herfkens RJ. MR fluoroscopy: Technical feasibility. Magn Reson Med. 1988;8:1–15
8. Zwart NR, Johnson KO, Pipe JG. Efficient sample density estimation by combining gridding and an optimized kernel. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67:701–710.