E. Doran1, S. J. Bawden1, P. M. Glover1, A. M. Peters1, S. T. Francis1, R. Bowtell1, and P. A. Gowland1
1Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Whole
body 7T MRI has the potential to improve monitoring of chronic liver disease by
building on advances made in parallel transmit technology. This abstract
outlays the measurement of T2* in the liver at 7T and compares with
measurements on the same subjects at 3 and 1.5T. Acceptable values were
obtained across all field strengths and T2* maps of the liver were obtained
from analysis of multi-gradient echo imaging sequences. This work forms the start of a
normative 7T data set that will provide vital information for developing other
7T MR liver sequences.
Purpose
Chronic
liver disease is a growing problem worldwide creating a pressing need to be
able to monitor liver inflammation, fibrosis and fat content non-invasively [1].
MRI can provide contrast based on these changes but specificity and sensitivity
remain challenges which whole body 7T MRI has the potential to overcome, though
much work remains to be done. Building on recent advances in parallel transmit
(PTx) technology [2] and 7T liver imaging [3], here we aim to measure the T2* transverse
relaxation time in the liver at 7T and to compare with measurements on the same
subjects at 3 and 1.5T. T2* is sensitive to iron deposition in the liver, so
this will form the start of a normative 7T data set and will provide vital information
for developing other 7T MR liver sequences.Methods
Scanning
was carried out on 7, 3 and 1.5T Philips Achieva systems. At 7T an 8-channel
transmit, 32-channel receive RF coil (MRcoils, Zaltbommel, Netherlands) was
used. Standard Philips body array coils were used at lower fields. T2* values
were measured using a multi-gradient echo imaging sequence. Fat-water in-phase
echo times were used to yield T2* values from the full tissue including fat and
water. TE values and other scan parameters are listed in Table 1. Image based
B0-shimming was implemented at all field strengths in rectangular regions
encompassing the liver. Three healthy volunteers were scanned using the same
protocol at each field strength to obtain transverse slices of the abdomen
during a single breathhold.
A
weighted log-linear least squares regression was used to fit for T2*. A mono-exponential model was chosen as it was
assumed that the fat fraction within the liver of the healthy subjects would be
low. A correction for through-slice dephasing [4] was found not to be required.
To avoid noise bias, a threshold was applied to eliminate later echoes that
were dominated by noise. A map was made and the fit for T2* was repeated in
three regions of interest (ROI) within high signal areas of the liver for each
subject. Fits for adipose tissue and muscle were also made to allow comparison
between tissue types. Care was taken to
maintain ROI’s of similar location and size whilst avoiding regions near veins
or signal drop out at 7T.Results
T2*
maps of the liver obtained from transverse slices of the abdomen in one subject
at 1.5, 3 and 7T are displayed in Figures 1(a), 1(b) and 1(c). The T2* values measured at each field strength
are shown in Tables 2 and 3 for the liver and adipose and muscle tissues respectively.
The differences in the mean T2* values in the liver at each field strength were
statistically significant (p < 0.05) and the inter-subject coefficient of
variation (COV) was 10.6 %, 5.8 % and 5.7 % at 7, 3 and 1.5T respectively. The
relationship between R2* values and magnetic field strength are shown in Figure 2. Applying a linear regression to the data shown in Figure 2 yielded values of
gradient and intercept: 17.3 s-1T-1 and 1.5 s-1 for
liver, 8.7 s-1T-1 and 24.2 s-1 for adipose
tissue and 5.3 s-1T-1 and 26.3 s-1 for muscle tissue.
The R2* values had Pearson correlation coefficients of R = 0.99, 0.98 and 0.97
for liver, adipose and muscle tissues respectively. Discussion
As
expected, the average T2* value of 8.2 ms measured in the liver at 7T is
significantly lower than the values at 3 and 1.5T. The T2* values measured in
the liver at 1.5 and 3T agree with values previously reported in the
literature [5]. Figure 1 shows that the T2* distribution is fairly uniform
across the liver and decreases as the magnetic field strength is increased.
Some areas in the 7T map were excluded from the fit due to low correlation
between signal values over all echoes. This indicates that shorter echo times may
be required in future rather than restricting the echo times to produce
in-phase fat and water signals. In the case of patients with high fat fractions
a full fat-water signal model would be required for more accurate signal decay
rates.Conclusion
In
vivo measurements of T2* in the liver were made at 1.5, 3 and 7T. The results show
the expected decrease of T2* at 7T and are in agreement with values previously
reported in the literature for 1.5 and 3T. Knowledge of T2* at 7T will advance
the development of pulse and sequence design for abdominal imaging at higher
field strengths and for investigating other MR measureable parameters within
the liver.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funding from the Engineering and
Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and Medical Research Council
(MRC) [grant number EP/L016052/1].References
1. Hoad
C.L et al, A study of T1 relaxation time as a measure of liver fibrosis and the
influence of confounding histological factors, NMR in Biomedicine, 2015, 28, 706-714
2. Padormo
F. et al, Parallel transmission for ultrahigh-field imaging, NMR in Biomedicine, 2015
3. Fischer
A. et al, Non-Enhanced T1-Weighted Liver Vessel Imaging at 7 Tesla, PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (6), 1-9
4. Peters
A. M. et al, T2* measurements in human brain at 1.5, 3 and 7 T, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2007, 25,
748-753
5. Mohammed
H. A et al, Comparison of 3 T and 1.5 T for T2* magnetic resonance of tissue iron,
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic, 2016,
18(40), 1-9