Michele Guerreri1,2, Silvia Capuani2, Amanda Antonelli3, and Lucia Manganaro3
1SAIMLAL Dept., Morphogenesis & Tissue Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, 2Physics Dept., CNR ISC UOS Roma Sapienza, Rome, Italy, 3Radiology Dept., Department of Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Synopsis
The purpose was
to investigate the potential of bi-exponential model of diffusion-weighted (DW)
signal decay to quantify diffusion and perfusion in healthy human placentas. The
relation between diffusion and perfusion parameters with microstructural
changes occurring during placenta development was also investigated. 26
pregnant women underwent DW examination. Apparent diffusion coefficient D, pseudo-perfusion
fraction f and pseudo-diffusion coefficient D* were obtained in specific placental
regions. The Pearson correlations between D, D*,f and clinical data
(Gestational Age, Body-Mass Index and basal Glycaemia) were evaluated. D and f show
to be good indicators of placenta morphological changes due to Gestational Age.
Introduction
Placenta is the
organ dedicated to the nutritive and respiratory functions between mother and
sun. Moreover, it carries out a fundamental role in the endocrine and immune
system regulation of fetus. Abnormalities in placentation are responsible for
most failure in pregnancy, such as preeclampsia or late intrauterine death1.
Due to the limited ability of ultrasound examinations to provide early placental dysfunction before clinical
macroscopic evidences, the search for alternative tools to perform a sensitive
and early diagnosis is highly desirable. In this contest, diffusion-weighted
imaging is an alternative technique for monitoring microstructural tissue
changes in placenta during gestational period. Because the
placental tissue is highly vascularized and many diseases are linked to functional properties of the placental vasculature,
in
this preliminary study, we used a bi-exponential model2 to quantify both
water diffusion and blood perfusion in healthy placentas. Toward this goal we
examined the placenta of pregnant women at 1.5T, measuring diffusion and
perfusion parameters in different placental sites and assessing their
associations with subjects’ clinical data such as Gestational Age (GA), Body
Mass Index (BMI) and basal Glycaemia (bG).Methodological Details
26
healthy pregnant women (GA range 19-37w), fulfilling the study inclusion
criteria, underwent MRI examination at 1.5T (Siemens Avanto, Erlangen, Germany),
without mother-foetal sedation. The study was approved by the local Ethics
Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before
entering the study. The MRI protocol included a Diffusion weighted Spin Echo-Echo
Planar Imaging with TR/TE=4000ms/79ms; bandwidth=1628Hz/px; matrix size=192x192,
number of slices=30. The in-plane resolution was 2.0x2.0mm2, the slice thickness=4mm. The diffusion encoding gradients were applied along 3
no-coplanar directions using six different b-values (50,100,150,400,700,1000
s/mm2), plus the b=0 image. The total acquisition time of DW
protocol was 6 minutes. With the help of an expert radiologist three Regions of
Interest (ROIs) were identified in each placenta: a Central ROI (C-ROI), a Peripheral
ROI (P-ROI) and a Umbilical ROI (U-ROI). Data were spatially smoothed using a
Gaussian filter with full-width-half-maximum of 3.2 mm. Signal intensity in
each ROI was averaged and then a bi-exponential function: $$$S(b)≈(1-f)e^{-bD}+fe^{-bD^\star}$$$.
was used to fit data. D, D* and f are the apparent diffusion
coefficient, the pseudo-perfusion coefficient and the pseudo-perfusion fraction,
respectively. Pearson test with Bonferroni correction was performed to
investigate correlation between D, D*
,f and GA, BMI and bG. Because low Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) of DWIs and no
data at low b-values (i.e. less than 200
s/mm2) are
obvious drawbacks to extract reliable D, D* and f parameters, we carefully selected the b-values
considering a proper compromise between the number of b values and the duration
of the exam. Moreover we evaluated SNR of DWI at each b value. Results
The location of the three different ROIs
investigated were displayed in Fig. 1, together with the signal decay and the
fitting procedure used to extract D, D*
and f in each ROI. D, D* and f mean values were displayed in Fig.2. A positive linear correlation
was found between f and GA only in the C-ROI (p<5.5∙10-3). Conversely,
no significant correlations were found between D, D*,f and BMI, bG.
Importantly, a significant negative correlation, was found between D and GA
(p<1.0∙10-4) for GA>30w in P-ROI,. while no-dependence of D
on GA was observed in GA range (19-29)w (see Fig. 3) The SNR of DWIs runs from
approximately 100 (for the b=0 image) to 25 (for DWI acquired at b=1000s/mm2).Discussion
The SNR was higher than 20, which is a fully acceptable
value for considering DW data reliable.
The mean D, D*
and f values are in agreement with
those found in literature 2-4.
However, in contrast with previous studies4-7
performed in healthy placenta by using bi-exponential model, we found a
positive correlation between f and GA. We obtained a significant progressive
increase of f with GA. This behaviour coherently reflects the increase of volume,
surface and length of villi with placental volume. On the other hand, the
decrease of D occurring from the 30th gestational week, highlights the parenchymal changes characterized by a more fibrotic environment
during last gestational weeks. Conclusions
We presented measurements of diffusion and perfusion parameters in
placenta of normal pregnancy performed using a bi-exponential model of the
DW signal decay and their correlation with clinical data (such as BMI, bG and
GA) which change with the placental development. The significant positive
correlation found between f and GA and the negative correlation between
D and GA in the last week of pregnancy suggest the potential of biexponential
model to provide information about placental
function and micro-morphology. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Siauve N, Chalouhi GE, Deloison B, et
al. Functional imaging of the human placenta with magnetic resonance. American
journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2015;213:S103-114.
2. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin
M, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in
intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988;168:497-505.
3. Moore RJ, Strachan BK, Tyler DJ, et al.
In utero perfusing fraction maps in normal and growth restricted pregnancy
measured using IVIM echo-planar MRI. Placenta 2000;21:726-732.
4. Moore R, Issa B, Tokarczuk P, et al. In
vivo intravoxel incoherent motion measurements in the human placenta using
echo-planar imaging at 0.5 T. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2000;43:295-302.
5. Sohlberg S, Mulic-Lutvica A, Lindgren
P, Ortiz-Nieto F, Wikstrom AK, Wikstrom J. Placental perfusion in normal
pregnancy and early and late preeclampsia: a magnetic resonance imaging study.
Placenta 2014;35:202-206.
6. Derwig I, Lythgoe DJ, Barker GJ, et al.
Association of placental perfusion, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging
and uterine artery Doppler ultrasound, and its relationship to pregnancy
outcome. Placenta 2013;34:885-891.
7. Manganaro L, Fierro F, Tomei A, et al.
MRI and DWI: feasibility of DWI and ADC maps in the evaluation of placental
changes during gestation. Prenatal diagnosis 2010;30:1178-1184.