Akos Varga-Szemes1, Rob J van der Geest2, U. Joseph Schoepf1, Carlo N De Cecco1, Taylor M Duguay1, and Pal Suranyi1
1Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States, 2Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
Synopsis
Clinical late
gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging of the myocardium requires inversion time
(TI) optimization for adequate image quality. As the optimal TI (TI0)
depends on various factors, its influence on the precision of myocardial LGE
quantification is of interest. In this study we aimed to prospectively
investigate how the precision of LGE quantification varies in the clinically
relevant TI range in 53 patients using T1-mapping-based synthetic inversion
recovery (IRsynth) approach. We concluded that phase-sensitive IRsynth
images provide precise quantification independent of TI, while magnitude IRsynth-based
quantification is precise at TI0 or longer TIs, but showing
decreased precision below TI0.
Purpose
Magnitude-reconstructed inversion recovery (IR) late
gadolinium enhancement (LGE) acquisition requires inversion time (TI) adjustment
in order to achieve distinguishable signal difference between normal and
enhanced myocardium. The optimal TI value (TI0) depends on various
factors1,
and typically increases in the time post-contrast. Since T1-mapping-based
synthetic IR (IRsynth) images can be generated at any theoretical TI (Figure 1)2, these images are
suitable to retrospectively evaluate the TI0 setting or range at any
post-contrast time point. Accordingly, the purpose of our study was to
investigate the influence of TI on the precision of myocardial LGE
quantification in IRsynth images in comparison with
conventional techniques in patients with ischemic LGE to define an optimal TI
range in which LGE evaluation can be precisely performed.Methods
From June 2014 to June 2015, 53 consecutive patients
referred for viability cardiac MRI were prospectively enrolled in this IRB
approved study. Patients underwent cardiovascular MRI on a 1.5T system
(MAGNETOM Avanto, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Twelve minutes post-contrast (0.1mmol/kg
gadobenate-dimeglumine), short-axis IR images were
generated using a steady-state free-precession (SSFP) based IR sequence (Field-of-view
340×255mm2; section thickness 8mm; acquisition matrix 192×106;
in-plane resolution 1.77×1.77mm2; TE/TR 1.1/2.6ms; bandwidth
965Hz/pixel; and flip angle 50°). Images were
reconstructed in both magnitude and phase-sensitive fashion. T1-mapping
was performed immediately after conventional LGE imaging using an
investigational prototype MOLLI sequence (Scheme of 4(1)3(1)2; other parameters
matched, except: TE/TR 1.1/2.6ms; bandwidth 1085Hz/pixel; and flip angle 35°). A
set of 81 IRsynth images with 5ms TI increments were generated as
previously described (Figure 2).2
Myocardial LGE was measured using a threshold-based algorithm (5SD)3,
and differences in the area of LGE measured at various TIs were compared using a
one-way analysis of variance.Results
IRsynth images
were successfully generated for every patient. Twenty patients showed ischemic myocardial
LGE. The average TI used for conventional LGE acquisition was 321±17ms, while TI0
in the IRsynth image set was 311±29ms (P=0.067). The conventional and IRsynth techniques yielded similar
areas of infarct at TI0 (magnitude 5.68±1.61 vs. 5.21±1.43cm2
(P=2024); phase-sensitive 4.92±1.66
vs. 4.38±1.47cm2 (P=0.1136). The TI
dependence of the precision of LGE area measurements by the magnitude and
phase-sensitive IRsynth methods is shown in Figure 3. The magnitude IRsynth technique
provided precise assessment of LGE area at TIs greater than or equal to TI0,
while precision was decreased below TI0. The quantified LGE area showed
significant differences at 25ms below TI0 (P<0.001). LGE area measurements
did not show any significant difference over the analyzed TI range in the phase-sensitive
IRsynth image sets.Discussion
In this study, we
investigated the influence of TI on the precision of LGE area quantification
using IRsynth approaches. Our results indicate that LGE
quantification using phase-sensitive IRsynth
images provides consistent LGE area assessment over a wide, clinically relevant
TI range, while magnitude IRsynth
images show decreased precision below a certain TI level. Our results also suggest
that prospective TI optimization using a Look-Locker TI-scout sequence may not
be necessary before LGE imaging, as any TI within 150ms above TI0 provides
good precision. However, this conclusion may not be fully applicable to
conventional LGE techniques. While the clinical relevance of these results may
be limited at sites where phase-sensitive IR imaging is available, the IRsynth
approach may provide substantial benefits for research where quantification of LGE
size is important. This is especially true in multicenter trials in which the
experience levels of the observers vary and where IRsynth imaging may help
standardize image evaluation by eliminating confounding operator-dependent
factors from image acquisition and analysis.Conclusions
In conclusion, the
results of our study indicate that the precision of LGE area quantification
using magnitude IRsynth images is reliable over a wide TI range but
only at or above TI0, while the precision using phase-sensitive IRsynth
images is consistent over the entire clinically relevant TI range. Synthetic
T1-based IR images are reliable for LGE quantification and may provide benefit
over conventional LGE methods by eliminating the effects of operator dependence. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et
al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial
infarction. Radiology 2001;218(1):215-223.
2. Varga-Szemes A, van der Geest RJ,
Spottiswoode BS, et al. Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement: Accuracy of T1
Mapping-based Synthetic Inversion-Recovery Imaging. Radiology
2016;278(2):374-382.
3. Amado LC,
Gerber BL, Gupta SN, et al. Accurate and objective infarct sizing by
contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a canine myocardial infarction
model. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44(12):2383-2389.