Hossam El-Rewaidy1, Shiro Nakamori1, Gifty Addae1, Warren Manning1, and Reza Nezafat1
1Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
A new
framework based on Active Shape Models (ASM) is introduced to correct the
motion artifacts induced by respiratory and cardiac motion in myocardial T1
mapping. This framework includes three main steps: training ASM model to
capture intensity variations of T1 images at different inversion
times, segmentation of T1 weighted images using the trained model,
and estimating and applying the registration parameters to correct for motion
between images.
Introduction
Myocardial T1 mapping sequences enable
quantitative assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis. In these sequences, a
series of T1-weighted (T1-w) images are acquired and used
for pixel-wise estimation of T1 values by curve fitting. However,
motion between these images often results in artifacts. The in-plane motion
mostly appears as displacements of the myocardium in the image, while
through-plane motion induces some scaling, combined with slight variations in myocardial shape. Therefore,
motion correction is commonly used to correct for in-plane motion in myocardial
T1 mapping1-3. In this work,
we introduce a new non-rigid registration method based on modelling the image
intensity at different ranges of inversion times along the relaxation T1
to compensate for respiratory and cardiac motions.Methods
One of the challenging issues in
motion correction in T1 mapping is rapid variation of image
contrast/intensity between different T1-w images. We propose to use an Active
Shape/appearance Model (ASM)-based framework to model the variations of the
image intensity of Left Ventricular (LV) myocardial boundaries of different T1-w images
of T1 mapping sequence (Fig.
1). To train this model, intensity profiles along the perpendicular
lines to both epi- and endocardial boundaries are extracted at different
spatial landmarks from different subjects in a training dataset. Mean and
covariance matrices of the captured profiles are then calculated to represent the
expected intensity at each range of inversion times, i, and its modes of variation. Another shape model (GSM), is built
for LV myocardium where epicardium and endocardium boundaries
are manually delineated. Then, the mean and covariance matrix of extracted
contours are calculated. In segmentation, the mean shape
of GSM model is inserted into the reference image, Iref. In this work we chose to use the T1-w
image with highest contrast as reference. This initial mean shape is
iteratively evolved using a matching algorithm to segment the myocardium, guided
by the models built during training (Fig.
2). The final segmented contour (Cref)
of Iref is used to
generate a new shape model (SSM) specific to the T1-w set of images,
Ii; where i is the inversion time index. Simulated
scaling factors and additive shifts, similar to those caused by respiratory
motion, are generated from a Gaussian distribution and applied to Cref to produce a number of
simulated shapes specific to this set of T1-w images. The SSM
model is then used with the training appearance models at each inversion time
to segment the other Ii images and generate set of corresponding
contours, Ci. Rigid and
non-rigid parameters between the two contours, Cref and each Ci,
are calculated and applied to the ith
image, Ii, using rigid
transformations (rotation, scaling and translation), and nonlinear image
warping (mapping) for the non-rigid parameters (Fig. 3). To evaluate the proposed algorithm, we have acquired myocardial T1
maps in 60 patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease. Imaging was
performed using a 1.5T Philips Achieva system. Native T1 mapping was
performed using free-breathing slice-interleaved T1 (STONE) sequence4 with the following parameters: TR/TE = 2.7/1.37 ms, FOV = 360×351 mm2,
acquisition matrix = 172×166, voxel size = 2.1×2.1 mm2, slice thickness = 8 mm,
and flip angle = 70o. The dataset was divided into two equal parts: 30
patient-datasets for training and 30 patient-datasets for testing the model. For all cases, the LV epi- and endocardial boundaries were manually
delineated and the extracted contours were considered as the ground truth for
training and validating the model. The proposed framework is quantitatively
validated by calculating Dice index and Hausdorff measure between the manual
segmented contours and the contours produced after registration.Results
Figure 4 shows the T1 maps at 5 short
axial slices before and after registering the T1 images. Motion
correction removes the artifacts associated with motion between different T1-w
images. Figure 5 shows an example of registering a set of T1-w images,
as well as the automatic segmentation of Iref. All T1-w images
showed good mapping for both myocardium and blood after applying the
registration parameters. Dice similarity
index was increased from 0.901±0.09 before correction to 0.93±0.06 after using the proposed method (p<0.05). The average Hausdorff
measure was decreased from 7.1±5.4 mm to 5.6±4.4 before and after the
correction, respectively, (p<0.05). The computation time for training the
framework was ~90 s, and that for registering a T1-w set of 11 image was
~5 s with two image resolutions using a Matlab implementation on
intel Xenon, 2.8 Hz CPU.Conclusion
The proposed framework for registering T1
weighted images based on ASM improves image quality of T1 maps by minimizing
the impact of motion.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Xue H, Shah S, Greiser A, Guetter C, Littmann A, Jolly MP, Arai AE, Zuehlsdorff S, Guehring J, Kellman P. Motion Correction for Myocardial T1 Mapping using Image Registration with
Synthetic Image Estimation. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2012; 67(6):
1644–1655.
2. Roujol S, Foppa M, Weingartner S, Manning WJ, Nezafat R. Adaptive
Registration of Varying Contrast-Weighted Images for Improved Tissue
Characterization (ARCTIC): Application to T1 Mapping. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2015; 73(4): 1469–1482.
3. Xue
H, Greiser A, Zuehlsdorff S, Jolly MP, Guehring J, Arai AE, Kellman P.
Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for myocardial T1 mapping with motion
correction and parametric fitting. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2013;69:1408–1420.
4. Weingärtner
S, Roujol S, Akçakaya M, Basha TA, Nezafat R. Free-breathing multislice native
myocardial T1 mapping using the slice-interleaved T1 (STONE) sequence. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2014; 74:115–124.