Sanhita Sinharay1, Gabriela Fernández-Cuervo2, Jasmine P. Acfalle1, and Mark D. Pagel3
1Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, 2Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, 3Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
Synopsis
CatalyCEST MRI with a
diamagnetic CEST agent, 4-acedamido-2-(sulfoxy)benzoic acid, can
detect the activity of sulfatase. An
enzyme-responsive CEST signal was compared to an unresponsive CEST signal to
determine a reaction coordinate of contrast agent cleavage by sulfatase. This imaging method produced parametric maps
of CEST signal amplitudes and the reaction coordinates. Three isoforms of the enzyme were tested in
biochemical solutions. catalyCEST MRI
with the agent detected sulfatase activity in the media from
sulfatase-expressing HEK293 cells but not in the media of sulfatase-deficient
BT529 cells.
Purpose
We sought to develop a diamagnetic CEST MRI contrast agent that can
detect sulfatase enzyme activity. We
hypothesized that derivatizing salicylic acid with a sulfate group would
produce a CEST signal at ~9 ppm only after sulfatase cleaved the sulfate group
from the agent.1 An acylamide
group on the agent would produce a CEST signal at ~5 ppm that would be
enzyme-unresponsive.2 A
comparison of the two CEST signals could then be used to detect sulfatase
activity in a concentration-independent manner.3Methods
We
synthesized 4-acedamido-2-(sulfoxy)benzoic
acid in 71% yield. MRI studies were performed with a 72 mm transceiver coil in
a 7T Biospec MRI scanner, at 37.0 °C. CEST
spectra were obtained using a CEST-FISP MRI protocol with TR: 3.196 ms; TE:
1.598 ms; excitation flip angle: 30°; centric encoding during acquisition;
matrix: 128 x 128; field of view: 8 x 8 cm; in-plane spatial resolution: 625 x
625 μm; slice thickness: 1 mm; number of slices: 1; number of averages: 1.4 We acquired a
series of 85 images with selective saturation applied at 3 mT for 5 seconds at saturation frequencies in 0.25 ppm
increments from 15 ppm to -3 ppm and 1 ppm increments from -4 ppm to -15 ppm,
for a total scan time of 7:42 min. Each
CEST spectrum from a region of interest in an image of a sample was analyzed by
fitting the spectrum to a sum of three Lorentzian line shapes to account for
two CEST signals and direct saturation of water.2 The center, width,
and amplitude of each Lorentzian line was allowed to change to optimize the
fit.
The
r1 relaxivities were determined using a
spin echo MRI protocol with a 12.7 ms TE; 10 TR times between 18.339 and 10000
msec; 1 mm slice thickness; 782 x 782 mm in-plane resolution; 5 x 2.5 cm field
of view; and 64 x 32 matrix. The same protocol was used to measure The r2
relaxivities were measured with a 15- 960 ms TE in increments of 15 ms; 40 sec
TR time; 1.07 mm slice thickness; 400 x 400 mm in-plane resolution; 5.12 x 2.56
cm field of view; and 128 x 64 matrix size. To calculate the T1 and T2 relaxation
times, the signal amplitudes were fitted with a monoexponential function with a
constant to account for a possible DC offset using ParaVision® PV5.1 (Bruker
Biospin, Inc., Billerica, MA). Results
The CEST spectra of 45
mM of the agent at pH 7.2 before cleavage (substrate) and after cleavage
(product) with 5 units of H.pomatia mollusk (the snail in escargot) showed
the appearance of a CEST signal at 9.0 ppm after the enzyme was added to the
substrate, while the CEST signal at 5.0 ppm was largely unchanged. Similar results were produced with sulfatase
from abalone mollusk (a sea snail) and A. aerogenes (a bacterial coliform),
showing that the agent can detect isoforms of sulftase. Spatial maps of % CEST signal were used to
produce parametric maps of the reaction coordinate for the enzyme (Eq. [1]). The r2
relaxivities were negligible, and the r1 relaxivities were too low
to be reliably measured, confirming that the substrate and product only act as
a CEST agent.
The CEST spectra and
after incubation of the agent with HEK293 cell suspension showed the appearance
of a CEST signal at 9.0 ppm,5 while the same CEST MRI study with
BT549 cell suspension showed no appearance of a CEST signal at 9.0 ppm. In both
studies, the CEST signal at 5.0 ppm was largely unresponsive to enzyme
activity. Broader line widths of the direct saturation of water were attributed
to the biological milieu of the cell suspension that typically shortens the T2 relaxation
time of the sample. This result matched
the high expression and secretion of sulfatase enzymes from HEK293 cells, and
the absence of expression and secretion from BT549 cells.Discussion
These
results confirm that sulfatase activity can be detected using catalyCEST MRI
with a diamagnetic agent.7 The ratio of the two CEST signals could
measure a reaction coordinate in biochemical solutions of various isoforms of
sulfatase, and in the in vitro
studies of cell lines that express and secrete high and low sulfatase enzymes.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Fernández-Cuervo G, et al., ChemBioChem
2016.
2. Hingorani D, et al., Contrast Media Molec Imaging 2016;11:130–138.
3. Sinharay S, et al., Magn Reson Med 2016,
epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26278..
4. Shah T, et al., Magn Reson Med 2011;65:432–437.
5. Rush
JS, et al., ChemBioChem 2010:11;2096- 2099.
6. C. Zhu C.,
et al., Oncol Rep 2016, 35, 1318-1328.
7. Sinharay S,
et al., Chem Euro J 2016;22:6491-6495.