Chris Hanstock1, Dana Cobzas1, and Christian Beaulieu1
1University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Synopsis
Few studies have focused on metabolite
diffusion using 1H-MRS, compared to the vast number observing water diffusion
by DWI/DTI. These MRS studies are lengthy, therefore difficult to implement
clinically, and use up to three b-values to yield the diffusion spectra. Single
exponential signal loss is assumed for metabolites, neglecting the possibility
of non-linear decay at high b-values, as has been observed for water. Our goals
are: (i) Characterize the metabolite signal decay versus b-value in human white
matter to determine the non-linear region. (ii) Develop a rapid diffusion
tensor spectroscopy method that can be executed in a clinically useful time.
Purpose
While
there is a vast body of work investigating the diffusion of water in human
brain by MRI, fewer studies have focused on metabolite diffusion using 1H-MRS1-5.
These studies typically require lengthy acquisition times (~20 min / b-value
for full tensor1,2,4, and ~10 min for parallel and perpendicular only
measurements3,5) and use up to three b-values (maximum b ~ 1600 –
5000 s/mm2) to yield the diffusion spectra. Single exponential
signal loss is assumed, but the diffusion coefficients could be biased from
non-linearity of signal decay at high b-values, which has been observed in
excised nerve tissue6, rodent and human brain7,8.
The purpose here is two-fold: (i) develop a diffusion tensor spectroscopy (DTS)
method that can be executed in a clinically relevant time and (ii) characterize
the metabolite signal decay as a function of b-value in human white matter. Methods
Spectra
were acquired (4.7T Varian, maximum gradient 60 mT/m) in 5 healthy volunteers
(26±5 years) from a 3x3x3 cm3 volume in the parieto-occipital white
matter to characterize the signal decay as a function of b-value (Experiment 1), and a 1x3x4 cm3
volume centred on the corpus callosum body for evaluating a rapid DTS protocol
(Experiment 2). A diffusion-weighted
PRESS sequence9 with 8-step phase-cycle routine10 was
used (20 seconds/spectrum) with each average saved separately. Sequence parameters
for all studies were: Experiment 1:
TR=2.5s, TE=180ms, δ=25ms, Δ=60ms, either Xdiff, or Ydiff or Zdiff
stepped in 51 increments with b-value = 0 to 8590 s/mm2, AQ time = 17.5
min per gradient direction. Experiment 2:
TR=2.5s, TE=90ms, δ=20ms, Δ=34ms, 8 averages, 6 direction tensor [Xdiff,Ydiff,Zdiff]
= [-1,-1,0] [-1,0,-1] [0,-1,-1] [1,-1,0] [1,0,-1] [0,1,-1]), b-values = 500,
1000, 1650, 2100, 2700, 3400 s/mm2, AQ time total = 12 minutes. In 2
subjects an extra acquisition at b=0s/mm2 was performed (2 minutes extra time).
Gradient calibration was performed on an n-octanol phantom (mean diffusivity
(MD) = 0.142x10-3 mm2/sec at 23C). Phase alignment
used a new method for data correlation to detect the optimal angle in the
frequency domain, followed by bias correction using a second-order polynomial. These
phase-aligned data were transformed to the time domain and a 2D FFT applied to
yield the desired spectrum. Peak area estimates were determined either for the
reference phantom n-octanol methylene peak or the singlet NAA, Cr and Cho peaks
from the brain using LCModel11 analysis. Fractional anisotropy (FA),
MD, and parallel and perpendicular diffusivities were determined for each
metabolite. Results
In Experiment 1, adequate SNR (>10 for
the NAA peak from LCModel analysis results) was achieved from the sum of 8
averages (Figure 1), for both the
n-octanol phantom and the parieto-occipital white matter of a healthy control
subject. The plot of log signal for the target peaks versus the b-value
illustrates a linear fit across full range for n-octanol and only up to b-value
~3000 s/mm2 for brain
Based
on the departure from a linear decay observed in Experiment 1 (Figure 1b)
for the metabolites, the maximum b-value used in Experiment 2 from the mid-corpus callosum shown in Figure 2, was 3400 s/mm2 which used
six b values along each of six diffusion directions (12 min acquisition time
total), shown in Figures 3 &4 to yield: MD
in 10-3 mm2/s (NAA=0.28±0.05, Cr=0.31±0.03, Cho=0.27±0.01),
FA (NAA=0.74±0.02, Cr=0.63±0.08, Cho=0.68±0.17), DParallel in 10-3
mm2/s (NAA = 0.55 ± 0.10, Cr = 0.55 ± 0.09, Cho = 0.52 ± 0.12), and DPerpendicular in 10-3 mm2/s (NAA = 0.19 ±0.01, Cr =
0.14 ± 0.03, Cho = 0.14 ± 0.05) over all 5 volunteers.
Discussion & Conclusion
Our
refined methodology acquired spectra for each b-value/direction in 20 seconds,
making feasible both the 51 b-value signal decay study (Experiment 1), and the six b-value/6 direction rapid DTS (Experiment 2). The plots shown in Figure 1b illustrate a departure from
linearity above ~ 3000 s/mm2, compared to that for the n-octanol
(Figure 1a), highlighting the
caution needed when selecting b-values for DTS studies. This is particularly
pertinent for previously reported analyses using a 2-point fit, and raises the
possibility of error if using a b-value in a non-linear region. Our DTS study took this information into account and acquired data within the linear
decay region. The use of six b-values yielded full tensor data in 12 minutes
that is consistent with the literature that used much longer scan times. Fine
tuning of our new method to use fewer b values would provide additional time
savings to allow for studies of multiple DTS volumes, or for studies of
critically ill subjects to keep total scan time to a minimum. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for financial support for this work.References
1. Upadhyay
J, Hallock K, Erb K, Kim D-S, Ronen I. Magn Reson Med 2007,58,1045-1053
2. Ellegood J, Hanstock C, Beaulieu C. Magn Reson Med 2006,55,1-8.
3. Ercan A, Techawiboonwong A, Versluis M, Webb A, Ronen I. Magn Reson Med 2015,73,2053-2061
4. Ellegood J, Hanstock C, Beaulieu C. NMR in Biomedicine 2011,24,270-280.
5. Wood E, Ercan A, Branzoli F, Webb A, Sati P, Reich D, Ronen I. NMR in Biomedicine 2015,28,976-987.
6. Assaf Y, Cohen Y. NMR Biomedicine 1999:12:335–344.
7. Pfeuffer J, Provencher S, Gruetter R. Magn Reson Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 1999, 98-108.
8. Niendorf T, Dijkhuizen R, Norris D, van Lookeren Campagne M, Nicolay K. Magn Reson Med 1996,36,847-857.
9. Nicolay K, Braun K, Graaf R, Dijkhuizen R, Kruiskamp M. NMR in Biomedicine 2001,14,94-111.
10. Hennig J. J Magn Reson 1992,96,40-49
11. Provencher S. NMR in Biomedicine 2001,14,260-264.