Imaging of the renal system with sodium MRI has gained interest in the past few years, especially in using the technique to quantify, and assess for, changes in the cortio-medullary sodium gradient.
The main hindrance for previous work has been the lengthy scan time required to obtain sodium images. However, utilizing a 3D cones trajectory, the work presented here shows good detection of the cortio-medullary sodium gradient, in a clinically feasible scan time, in a sample of six healthy controls.
6 healthy volunteers (mean age 28 +- 4.5 years) were imaged on a 3T GE HDx (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI).
Subjects were placed in a supine position in the magnet. Proton images of the kidneys were acquired with an 8 channel abdominal array coil. T1 and T2 FLAIR weighted images were collected for image analysis (T1 acquisition: 2mm Slice Thickness, 3.26ms Repetition Time (TR), 1.1ms Echo time (TE), 38cm Field of View (FOV), 288x288 matrix size, Flip Angle (FA) 12 degrees. T2 FLAIR acquisition:2mm slice thickness, TR = 8652ms, Inversion Time = 2250, 2 Averages, 6mm Slice Spacing, 32cm FOV, 256x256 Matrix Size, Flip Angle = 90 degrees).
Sodium imaging was performed with two parallel loop coils placed anteriorly and posteriorly over the kidneys. Sodium concentration phantoms of 30mmolL and 80mmolL in 4% agar, were placed inside of the coils’ field of view as concentration calibrants. Imaging was performed using a 500us hard excitation pulse and a 3D cones readout, with scan time taking five minutes in total for the sodium acquisition (Respiratory gated, 24cm FOV, Slice Thickness = 4.5mm interpolated to 2mm, In-plane resolution = 4.5mm2 interpolated to 2mm2, Flip Angle = 90, TE = 0.5ms, TR = 150ms, Number of excitations per average = 197, Number of Averages = 10, Readout length = 30ms).
Sodium concentration maps were created by fitting each voxel against the calibration curve formed by the sodium standards vi. All image analysis was performed in Matlab (The MathWorks, MA). For each volunteer the Medulla, Cortex, and whole kidney regions were segmented by hand, for both kidneys, and the average sodium concentration in the regions, was calculated. Further segmentation of the medulla and cortex was performed per slice as previously described vii.
To test for difference in concentration between segmented regions a two-tailed p-test was performed, with significance defined as p<0.05.
i G. Madelin and R. R. Regatte, “Biomedical applications of sodium MRI in vivo.,” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 511–29, Sep. 2013.
ii N. Maril, R. Margalit, J. Mispelter, and H. Degani, “Sodium magnetic resonance imaging of diuresis: Spatial and kinetic response,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 545–552, 2005.
iii N. Maril, R. Margalit, J. Mispelter, and H. Degani, “Functional sodium magnetic resonance imaging of the intact rat kidney,” Kidney Int., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 927–935, 2004.
iv N. Maril, R. Margalit, S. Rosen, S. N. Heyman, and H. Degani, “Detection of evolving acute tubular necrosis with renal 23Na MRI: studies in rats.,” Kidney Int., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 765–768, 2006.
v F. Riemer, B. S. Solanky, C. Stehning, M. Clemence, C. a M. Wheeler-Kingshott, and X. Golay, “Sodium (23Na) ultra-short echo time imaging in the human brain using a 3D-Cones trajectory,” Magn. Reson. Mater. Physics, Biol. Med., vol. 27, pp. 35–46, 2014.
vi J. D. Christensen, B. J. Barrère, F. E. Boada, J. M. Vevea, and K. R. Thulborn, “Quantitative tissue sodium concentration mapping of normal rat brain,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 83–89, 1996.
vii N. Maril, Y. Rosen, G. H. Reynolds, A. Ivanishev, L. Ngo, and R. E. Lenkinski, “Sodium MRI of the human kidney at 3 tesla,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 56, pp. 1229–1234, 2006.