Christopher Brian Abraham1,2, Prashant Jani3, Roxanne Turuba1,2, Michael Campbell1,2, Ingeborg Zehbe1,2, and Laura Curiel1,2
1Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada, 2Thunder Bay Regional Research Institute, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada, 3Thunder Bay Regional Health Science Center, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
Synopsis
In
this study we characterized in vivo a
functional superparagmagnetic iron-oxide magnetic resonance contrast agent that
effects the T2 relaxation time in MRI. The agent
was developed by conjugating Molday Ion Carboxyl-6 (MIC6), with a de-immunized
mouse monoclonal antibody (muJ591) targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen
(PSMA). We propose this functional contrast agent as a non-invasive method to
detect prostate cancer cells that are PSMA positive to provide increased
differentiability from surrounding tissues for treatment. PSMA-positive prostate
tumours were induced into 20 immunocompromised mice. The functional contrast
agent was injected into 14 mice leaving 6 mice as controls. MR imaging was
performed on a clinical 3T scanner using different parameters on a MESE
sequence to obtain T2 relaxation time values. Tumour size, signal
intensity, and T2 relaxation time were obtained pre and post
injection and were found to have a lower value for treated mice compared to
controls. ICP confirmed the increased level of
elemental iron in treated mice tumours compared to controls. H&E staining
showed healthy morphology of all tissues collected. The reduction in T2
relaxation time for the functional contrast agent, combined with its
specificity against PSMA suggest its potential as a biologically-specific MR
contrast agent.
Purpose
In this study we
characterized in vivo a
functional superparagmagnetic iron-oxide magnetic resonance contrast agent that
effects the T2 relaxation time in MRI. Methods
The contrast agent was
developed by conjugating Molday Ion Carboxyl-6 (MIC6), with a de-immunized
mouse monoclonal antibody (muJ591) targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen
(PSMA).1 We propose this functional contrast agent as a non-invasive
method to detect prostate cancer cells that are PSMA positive to provide
increased differentiability from surrounding tissues for treatment.
PSMA-positive prostate tumours were induced into 20 immunocompromised mice. MR
imaging was performed on a clinical 3T MRI with an 8-channel wrist RF coil
,where tumour size, signal intensity, and T2 relaxation time were obtained.
Particle size analysis was performed using a Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument. A
treatment group consisting of eleven mice was injected with the contrast agent
at an average iron concentration of 60 μg/μL and 3 control mice were injected
with saline as a control (6 did not grow suitable tumours). Multi-Echo
Spin-Echo (MESE) sequences were used to obtain the T2 relaxation time before
injection, immediately after, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, 40 min, 1 day, 2 days and
3 days post injection. Mice were then euthanized and organs harvested.
Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) was used to determine the elemental iron
contents of the tissue samples and H&E staining was used to assess the
viability of tissues on injected animals.Results
The zeta potential of
antibody labeled complexes in different solutions was calculated to assess the
stability in different buffers for injection. Sodium bicarbonate as a buffer
had the highest zeta potential of 11.00 ± 2.56 mV compared to 1.44 ± 2.88 mV
for saline-buffer.
MR Signal from T2-weighted
images decreased overtime for animals in the treatment group compared to
control group however no signal reduction is detected 3 days post injection for
either group (Fig 1).
T2 relaxation time maps for a
treatment and a control mouse are shown in Fig 2. A decrease in T2 relaxation
time post injection can be observed for the treatment mouse where none is
observed for the control. The T2 relaxation time value dropped by 28%
30 min after injection. No reduction in T2 relaxation time can be
seen 3 days post injection suggesting that the amount of MIC6A was below the
detection threshold of MRI after 3 days.
The treatment group displayed
a significant reduction in the area of the tumour central cross-section area 2
days after injection (Fig 3, p=0.0006). At this time point, the mean tumour area
of the treatment group increased 12 ± 2 8% whereas the control group increased
209 ± 24%
ICP-AES results showed a significant
increase of iron levels between the treatment and the control group (Fig 4) as
assessed by a two-tailed student t-test with equal variance (p=0.007). Brain
tissue was used as control and did not show any change in iron levels.
H&E was performed on all
tissue samples collected and healthy morphology was confirmed by a pathologist
(Fig 5). Discussion
We were able to test in vivo
a functional contrast agent developed from muJ591 and MIC6. It was possible to
detect the contrast agent immediately after injection and within the first 24
hours post-injection. The presence of the antibody could be inferred from the
effect it had on tumour size 2 days post injection since it has been reported
the antibody has a therapeutic effect.2
The high sensitivity of ICP
allowed us to confirm an increase of iron levels in treated tumours compared to
controls. However, we could not conclusively detect the presence of the contrast
agent in the treated group 3 days post injection using MRI.Conclusion
In conclusion, we
demonstrated the use of the developed conjugate muJ591:MIC6, which can
specifically detect PSMA-expressing prostate cancer cells using a 3T Clinical
MRI. Both T2 relaxation time and signal intensity was reduced after
injection of the conjugate, aiding in the potential targeting and diagnosis of
prostate cancer. Our findings suggest that muJ591:MIC6 could be a promising
contrast agent that also showed signs of a therapeutic effect in reducing the
size of prostate tumours. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Bates D, Abraham S, Campbell M, Zehbe I, Curiel
L. Development and Characterization of an Antibody-Labeled Super-Paramagnetic
Iron Oxide Contrast Agent Targeting Prostate Cancer Cells for Magnetic
Resonance Imaging. Furlan R, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e97220. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097220
2. Bander NH, Trabulsi EJ,
Kostakoglu L, Yao D, Vallabhajosula S, Smith-Jones P, et al. Targeting
Metastatic Prostate Cancer With Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibody J591 to the
Extracellular Domain of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen. J Urol. 2003;170:
1717–1721. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000091655.77601.0c