Gwenaël Pagé1, Jérémie Bettoni2, Anne-Virginie Salsac3, and Olivier Balédent1,4
1BioFlow Image, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France, 2Maxillo-facial surgery, University Hospital of Amiens, Amiens, FL, France, Metropolitan, 3Biomechanics & Bioengineering Laboratory, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Compiègne, France, Metropolitan, 4Department of image processing, University Hospital of Amiens, Amiens, France, Metropolitan
Synopsis
The main purpose of this phantom
study is to assess the influence of k-t Principal Component Analysis reconstruction
technique on the 4D PC-MRI velocity measurements through millimetrics vessels.
4D PC-MRI sequence is repeated
4 times with a k-t PCA acceleration factor set at 0, 2, 4 and 8. Flow curves
are reconstructed and their mean flow and amplitude are compared.
Results shows it is possible
to reduce the acquisition time and still maintain a good mean flow measurement
accuracy. However, the k-t PCA acceleration factor causes loss of information,
resulting in a decrease of the amplitude of the flow curve.
Purpose
4D Phase-Contrast MRI (PC-MRI)
is mainly performed in vessels with an important diameter, such as the aorta1.
Only a few studies show its potential when used in intracranial vessels2
or arteries from the head and neck area, since their study implies a good
spatial resolution, resulting in a long acquisition time. The application of an
acceleration factor, using Principal Component Analysis (k-t PCA) can help solving this problem. Based on under-sampling the
k-space, PCA reduces highly dimensional data into lower dimensions, using correlations
within the data3. The main purpose of this study is to assess the influence
of k-t PCA on the flow measurement of a phantom composed by branches with small
diameters.Methods
This study is performed with a
MRI compatible Plexiglas phantom, composed by 6 branches with diameters similar
to those found on the face and neck area, Figure 1. A pump (Masterflex), connected
by pipes, provides a pulsatile flow to the phantom with a frequency selected at
100 cycles/min for an average flow rate of 87 ml/min. Before MRI acquisitions,
an accurate flow sensor (Transonic System Inc.) is placed before the phantom
input to measure the flow curve with high accuracy. The sensor is then placed in
the same conditions in the 3T, Achieva dStream, Philips MR system to perform
the 4D PC-MRI acquisitions.
Sequences are acquired using a
32 head coils channels in the axial plane with the following parameters: FOV=50x50mm2,
TE/TR=3/8ms, spatial resolution=0.6x0.6x0.6mm3, 1 repetition,
SENSE=0, 140 slices, and 16 frames for each cycle. The velocity encoding is
selected at 50cm/s in all three flow directions, above the maximum velocity
observed in the phantom. The sequence is repeated 4 times using a k-t PCA
acceleration factor set at 0, 2, 4 and 8 (factor of the under-sampling of the
k-space).
A homemade software has been
developed to process images from 4D PC-MRI sequences, using a semi-automatic
segmentation, based on a Fast Fourier Transform4, to reconstruct the
acquired volume. A slice is manually placed on the volume reconstructed from the
4D PC-MRI images to rebuild a 2D slice of the segmented branch, Figure 1. 4D flow data analysis included corrections for background phase error
and velocity aliasing.
For each branch of the phantom
(except the input branch, since it is too far from the coil to have enough
signal), the flow curve is reconstructed along the pulsatile cycle. This operation
is repeated 3 times for 3 different slice positions on the same branch. A mean
flow curve is then calculated for each branch. Accuracy of the flow measurement
is evaluated by calculating the difference between the expected and the measured
flow in each branch. The difference between the values is normalized in percent
of the expected flow rate. The amplitude of each flow curve is measured by
calculating the difference between the maximum and minimum peaks of the flow
curve.Results
The mean flow curves for each
value of acceleration factor are shown in Figure 2 and the evolution of the
amplitude obtained in each branch for each value of acceleration factor is
shown in Figure 3. Table 1 shows the percent error of mean flow and the amplitude
calculated in each branch as function of the acceleration factor. Discussion
For each acceleration factor the
percent error is less than 5%. Therefore, it is possible to divide by 15 the
acquisition time and still maintain a good measurement accuracy. However, the
results also show a decrease in the amplitude of the flow curves by 25% using the
acceleration factor 8. These results are consistent with those found by Greil
et al.5 in great vessels.
This result can be explained
by the method used to under-sample the k-space, which mainly samples the high
frequencies3: if mean flow is kept constant, when the under-sampling
factor increases, the amplitude of the signal decreases. This decrease can be
more significant in high frequency signals, such as from arterial blood flow.
In fact, this could reflect a
possible limitation of the k-t PCA acceleration factor when it is used to
calculate the Wall Shear Stress, which uses amplitude as the main parameter to determine
its value.Conclusion
In an experimental setup
providing physiological pulsatile flow with frequency and average flow rate that
can be found in human beings, it is possible to obtain accurate mean flow
measurement in vessels with diameters of one millimeter with an acquisition
time clinically acceptable. However, the k-t PCA acceleration factor causes
loss of information for peaks detection, resulting in a decrease of the amplitude
of the flow curve.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Markl et al. Comprehensive
velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic
resonance. CMR (2011)
2.
Wetsel et al. In
Vivo assessment and visualization of arterial hemodynamics with flow sensitized
4D. AJNR (2007)
3.
Pedersen et al.
k-t PCA Temporally constrained k-t BLAST reconstruction using principal
component analysis. MRM (2009)
4.
Balédent et al. Cerebrospinal
fluid dynamics and relation with blood flow: a magnetic resonance study with
semiautomated cerebrospinal fluid segmentation. Invest. Rad. (2001)
5.
Giese et al. Toward
highly accelerated Cartesian time-resolved 3D flow cardiovascular magnetic
resonance in the clinical setting. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. (2014)