Haifeng Gao1,2, Jie Sun1, Niranjan Balu1, Dongxiang Xu1, Daniel S Hippe1, Chun Yuan1, and Thomas S Hatsukami1
1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States, 2Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
Synopsis
Both
extracranial and intracranial atherosclerosis may be implicated in large-artery
atherothrombotic stroke. This proof-of-concept study characterized the
distribution and burden of atherosclerosis in thirteen patients with anterior
circulation cerebral ischemic events using combined extracranial and
intracranial vessel wall MRI. We found that atherosclerotic plaques were highly
prevalent in both extracranial and intracranial carotid arteries. Larger plaque
burden measured as plaque index on black-blood vessel wall MRI, rather than
luminal stenosis on time-of-flight MRA, was significantly associated with
clinical symptoms. Black-blood vessel wall MRI may be useful in identifying the
culprit plaque in patients with suspected large-artery atherothrombotic stroke.
Purpose
Large-artery
atherothrombotic stroke is a common subtype of ischemic stroke. Both extracranial
and intracranial carotid arteries are common sites for atherosclerosis.
1
As luminal stenosis is an imperfect marker of lesion severity, the role of
atherosclerosis in ischemic stroke based on angiography techniques may be
underestimated, particularly for intracranial atherosclerosis of which direct
plaque imaging has been limited until recently.
2,3 This proof-of-concept
study sought to characterize the distribution and burden of atherosclerosis in
patients with anterior circulation cerebral ischemic events using combined
extracranial and intracranial vessel wall MRI.
Methods
Subjects: We recruited 13 patients with anterior
circulation cerebral ischemic events in the past 6 months. Cardioembolic
strokes and other rare etiologies diagnosed during clinical workup were
excluded. Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were
obtained. MR protocol: Subjects
were scanned at Philips 3T using an eight-channel carotid coil for extracranial
carotid arteries and an eight-channel head coil for intracranial arteries. The
carotid protocol included two previously described 3D sequences with 0.8 mm
isotropic resolution.4,5 The intracranial protocol included T1-weighted,
T2-weighted, and proton-density-weighted volumetric isotropic turbo spin echo6
with 0.6 or 0.8 mm isotropic resolution. Zero-padding was used to reduce pixel
size in all three dimensions. Routine time-of-flight MRA (both carotid and
brain) and brain MRI were also performed. Image
analysis: Images were analyzed blinded to clinical information using a
DICOM viewer with multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) views. Readers screened the
carotid arterial tree on black-blood images for distinct plaques defined as
focal wall thickening that exceeded two times reference wall thickness. Plaque
location, luminal stenosis, plaque index (1 - lumen diameter / outer wall
diameter), and intraplaque hypointensities (indicating necrotic core or
calcification) were recorded. Luminal stenosis was graded on time-of-flight
MRA: no stenosis, mild (<50%), moderate (extracranial: 50-70%, intracranial:
≥50% without flow void), severe (extracranial: >70%, intracranial: flow void).
Plaque index was measured on MPR images of black-blood MRI that gave a
cross-sectional view of the lesion. Statistics:
Pearson’s correlation coefficient, McNemar’s test, the paired t-test and the Wilcoxon
signed-rank test were used as appropriate to compare the symptomatic and
asymptomatic side.Results
Clinical
characteristics: Mean age was 63.2 ± 14.9 years. Eight (61.5%) were
male. The mean time interval between clinical event and vessel wall MRI was
110±70.3 days. Plaque distribution:
Distinct plaques were identified bilaterally in all subjects and frequently affected
all three sequential arterial beds (extracranial carotid artery, intracranial
carotid artery, terminal branches of internal carotid artery) irrespective of
symptom status (Figure 1-2). The most affected arterial segment on the
symptomatic side was extracranial carotid artery whereas on the asymptomatic
side was middle cerebral artery. However, there was no significant association
between plaque distribution and clinical symptom. Plaque burden: The symptomatic and asymptomatic side did not
show a difference in the degree of luminal stenosis, although numerically there
were more lesions with moderate or severe stenosis on the symptomatic side
(Figure 3). Nonetheless, plaque index was significantly higher on the
symptomatic side (0.60 ± 0.16 vs. 0.49 ± 0.08, p=0.024). Intraplaque
hypointensities were frequently noted in at least one plaque on both
symptomatic and asymptomatic side. Correlation
between different arterial beds: The correlation in plaque index appeared
higher between the two extracranial carotid arteries or between the two
intracranial carotid arteries compared to that between ipsilateral extracranial
and intracranial carotid arteries (Figure 4).Discussion
In
patients with anterior circulation cerebral ischemic events, we found that atherosclerotic
plaques were highly prevalent in both extracranial and intracranial carotid arteries.
Such extensive atherosclerosis was seen on both sympatomatic and asymptomatic
side, suggesting this is mainly driven by systemic risk factors. On the other
hand, a significant association was found between focal plaque burden measured
as plaque index and clinical symptoms. Therefore, among the multiple plaques
that may be present along the carotid arterial tree, those with larger plaque
burden may be at higher risk. Despite a high correlation in plaque index
between bilateral extracranial carotid arteries and between bilateral
intracranial carotid arteries, the correlation between ipsilateral extracranial
and intracranial carotid arteries was weak. Plaques with large burden may tend
to develop in extracranial carotid arteries for some patients whereas in
intracranial carotid arteries for others.
Conclusions
Multiple
atherosclerotic plaques are commonly seen along the carotid arterial tree in patients
with anterior circulation cerebral ischemic events. Detecting distinct plaques
in either extracranial or intracranial carotid arteries does not exclude the
possibility of culprit plaques located in the other artery bed.Acknowledgements
The
authors thank Kristi D. Pimentel and Alice M. Graden for their help with
patient recruitment. Grant support is from the National Institutes of Health
(R01 NS083503).References
2. Dieleman N, van der Kolk AG, Zwanenburg JJM, Harteveld
AA, Biessels GJ, Luijten PR, Hendrikse J. Imaging intracranial vessel wall pathology
with magnetic resonance imaging: Current prospects and future directions.
Circulation. 2014. 130(2):192-201.
3. Li ML, Xu WH, Song L, Feng F, You H, Ni J, Gao S, Cui LY,
Jin ZY. Atherosclerosis of middle cerebral artery: Evaluation with
high-resolution MR imaging at 3T. Atherosclerosis. 2009. 204(2):447–452.
4. Balu N, Yarnykh VL, Chu B, Wang J, Hatsukami T, Yuan C. Carotid
plaque assessment using fast 3D isotropic resolution black-blood MRI. Magn
Reson Med. 2011. 65(3):627-637.
5. Wang J, Bornert P, Zhao H, Hippe DS, Zhao X, Balu N,
Ferguson MS, Hatsukami TS, Xu J, Yuan C, Kerwin WS. Simultaneous noncontrast
angiography and intraPlaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging for carotid
atherosclerotic disease evaluation. Magn Reson Med. 2013. 69(2):337-345.
6. Qiao Y, Steinman DA, Qin Q, Etesami M, Schar M, Astor BC,
Wasserman BA. Intracranial arterial wall imaging using three-dimensional high isotropic
resolution black blood MRI at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011. 34(1):22-30.