Improvement in sensitivity is required to detect the weak signals with Fourier transform Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (FT-EPR). In the proposed method, the signal from a wireless coil filled with sample was enhanced by using pumping coil in the regular EPR system. In this study, we achieved approximately 6-fold of improvement in signal intensity compared with conventional FT-EPR system under the simulated condition of animal body. We will also show the results of oximetry using the LiPc in, in vivo applications to measure tissue oxygenation.
Results and Discussion
Figure 2 shows the results of the FT-EPR spectra with and without the pumping power when LiPc powder was used in the different pO2 condition. With the wireless coil and pumping power (-4.9 dBm), the signal intensity was enhanced approximately 6 times compared with conventional EPR detection (no pumping power). In addition, to detect the signal under 4% pO2 was possible while it was difficult to obtain the signal with conventional EPR detection. Figure 3 shows the EPR spectra of the LiPc crystal in PDMS and PBS. When the proper pumping power (in this case 12.4 dBm) was applied, taking into account of the loss of RF power in PDMS, the signal intensity was still enhanced approximately 6 times. This shows that the wireless coil in PDMS or in air have the same enhancement with appropriate pumping power.Conclusion
We have demonstrated the feasibility of enhancement of sensitivity by using the wireless coil to FT-EPR in in vivo condition. When the wireless coil was in air, the signal enhancement was approximately 6-fold. The same enhancement could be achieved in PDMS with increased pumping power. These demonstrates, the EPR measurement with wireless coil is also possible in implanted condition. We will apply this wireless coil to in vivo oximetry with more pumping power in future applications.1. Matsumoto S, Espey MG, Utsumi H, Devasahayam N, Matsumoto K, Matsumoto A, Hirata H, Wink DA, Kuppusamy P, Subramanian S, Mitchell JB, Krishna MC. Dynamic Monitoring of Localized Tumor OxygenationChanges Using RF Pulsed Electron ParamagneticResonance in Conscious Mice, Magn Reson Med. 2008; 59(3): 619-625.
2. Swartz HM, Khan N, Buckey J, Comi R, Gould L, Grinberg O, HartfordA, Hopf H, Hou H, Hug E, Iwasaki A, Lesniewski P, Salikhov I, WalczakT. Clinical applications of EPR: overview and perspectives. NMR Biomed. 2004 Aug; 17(5): 335-351.
3. Ahmad R, Kuppusamy P. Theory, Instrumentation, and Applications of EPR Oximetry. Chem Rev. 2010; 110(5): 3212-3236.
4. Qian C, Murphy-Boesch J, Dodd S, Koretsky A, Sensitivity enhancement of remotely coupled NMR detectors using wirelessly powered parametric amplification. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 68(3): 989–996.
5. Qian C, Yu X, Chen DY, Dodd S, Bouraoud N, Pothayee N, Chen Y, Beeman S, Bennett K, Murphy-Boesch J, Koretsky A. Wireless Amplified Nuclear MR Detector (WAND) for High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging of Internal Organs: Preclinical Demonstration in a Rodent Model. Radiology. 2013; 268(1): 228–236.
6. Devasahayam N, Subramanian S, Krishna MC, A novel programmable pulse generator with nanosecond resolution for pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance applications. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2008; 79, 026106