Till Huelnhagen1, Ariane Fillmer2, Antje Els1, Florian Schubert2, Bernd Ittermann2, and Thoralf Niendorf1,3,4
1Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association(MDC), Berlin, Germany, 2Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany, 3Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint cooperation between the, Charité Medical Faculty and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany, 4DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Synopsis
Respiratory motion induced B0 field
fluctuations, constitute a challenge for B0 sensitive CMR like
spectroscopy. Accommodating CMRS in a
single breath-hold is elusive if not prohibitive. Motion corrected approaches
under free breathing were demonstrated to substantially improve CMRS. Yet, B0
field fluctuations over the respiratory cycle may compromise spectral
resolution and data integrity. A compensation strategy like dynamically updated
first order shims synchronized with the respiratory motion, offers the
potential to enhance spectral quality and permits scan time shortening. This
work details respiratory motion induced B0 fluctuations in the
interventricular septum and examines the capability of linear shimming for
compensation of myocardial B0 fluctuations.
Purpose
Cardiac magnetic resonance 1H spectroscopy
(CMRS) provides means for probing myocardial energy metabolism for the study of
cardiac disease and heart failure [1]. The heart is one of the more challenging target
organs for MR due to cardiac and respiratory motion. Cardiac motion has only
very minor impact on B0 field homogeneity in the interventricular septum and its
fluctuation throughout the cardiac cycle [2]. Unlike
cardiac motion, respiratory motion induced B0 field fluctuations [3] constitute a challenge for B0 sensitive CMR.
In cardiac MRI this issue is commonly dealt with by breath hold techniques. Accommodating
CMRS in a single breath-hold is elusive if not prohibitive. CMRS may benefit from
free-breathing approaches, which – if properly motion corrected – were
demonstrated to substantially improve CMRS [4]. Yet, B0 field fluctuations over the respiratory
cycle may compromise spectral resolution and data integrity. A compensation
strategy like dynamically updated first order shims [5, 6] synchronized with the respiratory motion, offers the
potential to enhance spectral quality and permits scan time shortening. This
work details respiratory motion induced B0 fluctuations in the
interventricular septum and examines the capability of linear shimming for
compensation of myocardial B0 fluctuations.Methods
Two healthy volunteers of different body type (1
male, muscular, age=33, BMI=25.5 kg/m2, 1 female, slender, age=37,
BMI=18.8 kg/m2) were examined prior to lunch using a 7.0T whole body
MR system (Siemens Healthcare,Erlangen,Germany) using a 16 channel RF-transceiver
array for signal transmission and reception [7]. B0
mapping was performed with a cardiac triggered double echo gradient echo
technique (TE=(2.04, 4.08)ms, TR=5.9ms, spatial resolution=(2.8x2.4x4.0)mm3),
GRAPPA R=2, 8 slices covering the whole heart, gap=8mm). Volume selective
shimming was applied for a volume accommodating the heart, based on an end
diastolic cardiac triggered field map (TE=(2.04, 4.08)ms, TR=5.4 ms, spatial
resolution (4.2x4.2x8.0)mm3, 18 slices, gap=1.6mm). A polynomial fit
of 5th order was applied to the measured field map to approximate B0
and allow evaluation in arbitrary volumes at high spatial resolution. The fit
was evaluated on a 1mm3 isotropic grid. B0 homogeneity
was investigated for four breathing positions (diaphragmatic exhaled, diaphragmatic
inhaled, diaphragmatic half-inhaled, abdominal-inhaled) using a mid-septal ROI
resembling a spectroscopic voxel of size (18.7x9.4x6.1)mm3 [4] (Fig.1).
Histograms of the field distribution in the ROI were calculated. Prior to this
the mean B0 value within the ROI was subtracted for easier
comparison of the histograms. The histogram full width half maximum (FWHM) was
calculated as a measure of field homogeneity. The effect of a shim of first
order was simulated to investigate it’s capability to correct for field
inhomogeneities by applying a linear fit to the approximated field in the ROI
and subtracting it from the fitted field map. B0 homogeneity after
this virtual shim was again assessed using histograms of the field distribution
within the ROI.Results
The fitted field maps closely approximated the
measured field maps (Fig.2).
Overall field homogeneity was comparable for both volunteers. The mean B0 dispersions
across the myocardial voxel were FWHM= (12.9±1.6)Hz, (11.3±0.1)Hz, (12.0±0.1)Hz and (14.1±4.4)Hz
(mean±std) for the diaphragmatic (exhaled, inhaled, half-inhaled) and
abdominal-inhaled positions (Fig.3). While field homogeneity was best for the abdominal
breath hold and worst in the exhaled state in volunteer 1 (FWHM=11.0Hz and
14.1Hz), it was best in the exhaled state and worst during the abdominal breath
hold in volunteer 2 (FWHM=11.7Hz and 17.2Hz). The deviation in homogeneity
between the two subjects was highest for the abdominal breath hold (ΔFWHM=6.2Hz).
After applying the linear field correction the mean B0 dispersion across
the septal voxel was substantially improved to FWHM=(1.9±0.0)Hz, (1.5±0.2)Hz, (1.3±0.3)Hz
and (1.3±0.2)Hz (Fig.3),
with abdominal and half-inhaled positions yielding the highest field
homogeneity for volunteer 1 and 2 respectively (FWHM=1.1Hz and 1.2Hz).Discussion and Conclusion
Our results show that respiration
affects myocardial B0 dispersion, which is prone to thorax geometry
and breathing state. Our findings demonstrate that first order field correction
substantially improves field homogeneity across a small target volume and permits
a B0 fidelity of FWHM≈1Hz. Our results provide encouragement for free
breathing myocardial spectroscopy at 7.0 Tesla. To take it to the next level we
will evaluate how the myocardial B0 homogeneity outside the ROI
might be compromised by the linear shim, and how B0 non-uniformities
in the vicinity of the ROI may influence cardiac 1H MRS [8].Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]
Ewijk et al. (2015) NMR Biomed 28(7):747.
[2]
Huelnhagen et al. (2016) Magn Reson Med, Epub ahead of print,
doi:10.1002/mrm.26312.
[3]
Schmitter et al. (2015) Magn Reson Med 74(5):1291.
[4]
Fillmer et al., Proc. Intl. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 24, 2016:1100.
[5]
Blamire et al. (1996) Magn Reson Med 36(1):159.
Fillmer et al. (2015) Magn Reson Med
75(3):1119.
[7]
Thalhammer et al. (2012) J Magn Reson Imaging 36(4):847.
[8] Fillmer et al. (2015)
Magn Reson Med 73(4):1370.