Eunbi Ye1, Youngdae Cho1, Rupam Das1, Hyun-Man Baek2, and Hyoungsuk Yoo1
1University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea, Republic of, 2Korea Basic Science Institute
Synopsis
The improtance of
ultrahigh fields MRI has been rapidly increased due to its advantages in high
resolution and signal-to-ratio. In this study, the
SAR was analyzed in accordance with the conditions of insertion DBS and the
electromagnetic field is controlled by multi-channel coil. Our reserch demonstrated
the field control method using
convex optimization from the fields data can be
considered as a good strategy to drive the individual parameters of the RF
coil for solving the inhomogeneity and SAR
limitations, and it is safer for patients.
Introduction
Implantable devices made of metallic materials
such as Deep Brain Stimulator (DBS) which is the effective method to treat
for Parkinson's Disease (PD) are very hazardous in the MRI systems due to the
strong magnetic fields [1]. Research regarding
the safety of DBS at 1.5 T and 3 T has been reported, however, it has not
been explored at 7 T although the importance of ultrahigh fields MRI (7 T and
above) is increased recently because it has advantages of high resolution and
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [2]. In this study, the SAR was analyzed in
accordance with the conditions of insertion DBS and the electromagnetic field
is controlled by multi-channel coil [3]. This research can be a
guidance for future clinical applications of patient with the DBS at 7 T.Methods
The finite difference time
domain (FDTD) simulations were performed using the Sim4Life to solve the
electromagnetic fields [4]. To compare the difference of field distribution
between patients with implanted medical devices and not implanted, three
types of conditions were simulated, one is non-implanted case (no DBS) and
the others are implanted case (one DBS, two DBSs). Fig. 1 shows the
eight-channel RF coil based on a microstrip transmission line (MTL), and all
coils were tuned to resonant at 298 MHz (7 T) by changing the terminal and
port capacitor values. The DBS implant was designed based on the Medtronic
3387 electrode model. Fig. 2 presents two conditions of implanted case on
insertion the DBS leads into brain tissues for comparison. Three types of
simulations with the 8-channel transmission line coil element were performed
to calculate electromagnetic fields of each coil elements. Convex
optimization is used to decide the intensity and phase of each coil elements
for control the electromagnetic field. The objective of this way is to
alleviate the B1+ inhomogeneity
and to decrease the SAR in the entire by adjusting multi-channel RF coil
excitations. Fig. 3 refers to a polar plot of the weights designed by the
convex formulation using the B1+ fields and E fields data.Results
Table I shows the mean
values and peak values of SAR of three regions (Fig. 4). Before the convex
optimization, in the partial region, the average value of two DBSs case is about
1.6 times than one DBS case and 1.3 times than no DBS case. And the peak
value near the tip in two DBSs case is approximately 2.4 times than one DBS
case and 21 times than no DBS case. After the convex optimization, the SAR
values are lower after the convex optimization compared with no convex the
SAR distributions. The results applied the weights from the E fields data
pass over the limits, by proposed by the International Electro-technical
Commission (IEC) [5], in the partial region for the peak SAR. However, when
adjusting the weights from the B1+ fields data, all SAR
values are allowed by the IEC. By using the B1+ fields data, the maximum
value in the total region was decreased 56 % in the one DBS case, and 71 % in
the two DBSs case. In addition, the maximum value near the DBS tip was
decreased 58 % in the one DBS case, and 92 % in the two DBSs case.Conclusion
In
this study, the effect of the DBS in the 7 T MRI systems was demonstrated and
the electromagnetic fields were controlled by driving individual coil
elements. This work proves the patient implanted two DBSs have more
non-homogeneity in the B1+ fields and influence of the E fields, so
have higher SAR value. This the field control method using convex optimization from the B1+ fields data can be
considered as a good strategy to drive the individual parameters of the RF
coil for solving the B1+ inhomogeneity and SAR
limitations, and it is safer for patients.Acknowledgements
NRF
2016-R1D1A1A0991814References
[1] F. G. Shellock, "Radiofrequency
Energy-Induced Heating During MR Procedures: A Review," Journal of magnetic resonance imaging,
vol. 12, pp.30-36, Jul. 2000.
[2] J. Vaughan, et
al.,"7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in
head images," Magn. Reson. Med.,
vol. 46, pp. 24–30, Jul. 2001.
[3] H. Yoo, et al., "A method to localize
RF B1 fields in
high-fields magnetic resonance imaging systems," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 3365–3371, Dec.
2012.
[4] Sim4Life by ZMT, www.zurichmedtech.com.
[5] International Standard, Medical Equipment-Part 2-33 : Particular
Requirements for the Safety of the Magnetic Resonance Equipment for Medical
Diagnosis, 60601-2-33, International Electrotechnical Comission, Geneva,
Switzerland, 2002.