Rita Gil1, Daniel Nunes1, and Noam Shemesh1
1Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unkown, Lisbon, Portugal
Synopsis
Organotypic
slices are excellent controlled systems for investigating neural activity
without many of the confounds introduced by in-vivo conditions. Here we describe a new setup that allows imaging of a living
slice inside a MRI scanner while being stimulated with optogenetics which
induces neuronal activity in pre-targeted neurons. This setup allows the
survival of slices for at least three hours, without requiring new artificial CSF
(aCSF) to be flushed. This property is highly advantageous for avoiding
artifacts related with bubbles, motion or variation of shims during extended acquisitions.
Purpose
Despite its immense utility in mapping brain function, the Blood-Oxygenation-Level-Dependent
(BOLD) mechanism is only indirectly related with neuronal activity through complex
neurovascular couplings1. In investigating the complex neurovascular
– or indeed other fMRI mechanisms – there is a need for delivering precise
stimuli to controlled systems. An excellent example for this gap is diffusion
fMRI, which has been proposed as a more direct method for detecting neuronal
activity2-5, potentially detecting neural activity with faster
dynamics and with more spatial specificity compared to BOLD (though n.b., e.g.,
Ref. 6).
Organotypic
slices routinely serve as excellent models in neuroscience; while several
studies used MRI to study slices stimulated chemically3,6, the
advantages afforded by optogenetics open up new ways of probing neural activity.
Here we present a set up designed for optogenetic stimulation8,9 of
a living brain slice in the MRI scanner.Methods
The present custom-built setup (Figure 1), which was loosely based on [10],
has an inflow and outflow lines for artificial CSF flow (aCSF, 127mM NaCl,
2.5mM, KCl, 25mM NaHCO3, 1.25mM NaH2PO4, 25mM D-Glucose, 2mM CaCl2, 1mM MgCl2).
Several round pieces made from Plexiglas® were cut in order to position the brain
slice and hold it in place during acquisition. These round pieces allow the
insertion of an optic fibre which is then held and directed to the slice
through a smaller holder (made from the same material) to avoid gradient
induced motion. This set up was built to fit a 10mm NMR tube. Images can thus
be acquired while a living brain slice is being stimulated optogenetically, ensuring
that both the brain slice and optic fibre are kept in place and the stimulation
induced by light is robust throughout the acquisition.
Organotypic slices were prepared as explained elsewhere11
from C57BL/6 mice. pH measurements described below were performed using a Thermo
Scientific Orion 3 star
pH meter.
All
MRI experiments were performed on a 16.4T Bruker Ascend Aeon MRI scanner, using
a micro5 10mm probe capable of producing up to 300 G/cm in all directions. To
assess image quality, we performed multi-gradient echo MRI experiments with the
following parameters, TE=1.5ms, TR=350ms, NA=4, 32 echo images, echo
spacing=1.8ms, slice thickness= 0.5mm, FOV=16x11mm, resolution=80x79μm and MRI images of organotypic hippocampal
slices were acquired with a DWI-EPI sequence (TE=13.50ms, TR=45s, NA=80, slice
thickness=370mm, FOV=6.2mm2, in-plane resolution=138mm2,
BW=50kHz, b-value=2000 s/mm2, Δ/δ=3/1.7ms).Results and Discussion
Previous studies10,12 reporting MRI experiments in live brain
slices, suggested a ~5 min flush of aCSF every 20-30min; however, in our
hands, this flushing may introduce a host of artifacts including introduction
of bubbles to the slice, “motion” due to the fluid pressure, and effective
changes in shim settings. To establish how long the slices could be kept under
the similar conditions as in the magnet we measured the slice’s pH – perhaps
the most detrimental parameter for slice survival – outside the magnet. The pH of the aCSF in
contact with a living hippocampal slice placed in a set up as described was
measured every 10 minutes. Figure 2 shows the average and standard deviation
time evolution of pH measured in three different slices. The pH increases up to
7.44 after ~3h. A linear fit to the data points shows that at each
hour there is an increase of ~0.02 in the pH. This means that by starting with a
physiological pH of 7.35, an acquisition of three hours (maximum) can be done
without compromising the slice’s physiological state and neuronal activity due
to changes in the pH of the medium.
To
show the quality of images obtained using the setup, Figure 3 shows two different
hippocampal slices placed in the setup. The DWI-EPI acquisitions at very high b-value of
2000 s/mm2 show excellent SNR, and no significant distortions
originating from the setup, in particular from the fiber, could be observed.
Figure 4 shows a further assessment of the inhomogeneity induced by the fiber,
via multi-gradient echo images. Even at very long echo times for a 16.4T
scanner, the fiber only induces very small field inhomogeneities. Indeed, the
typical linewidth in localized spectroscopy performed on the water signal for
shimming evidenced linewidths of ~6Hz. This setup described above is adequate for the acquisition of MRI images
for a long period of time, which facilitates more complex experiments such as
dfMRI (data not shown). The advantages of optogenetically-induced neuronal
activity8,9 in living brain slices is clear given the temporal
precision and population specificity. Experiments coupling dfMRI, optogenetics,
and optical imaging are indeed underway in our Lab.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by
funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme (Starting Grant, agreement No. 679058). The authors would like to
acknowledge Dr. Inbal Israely and Dr. Maria Royo for their technical assistance
with slice dissection and culturing and Dr. Cristina Chavarrías for her help in programming the imaging sequence.
References
[1] Logothetis, Nikos K. "What we can do and what we cannot do with
fMRI." Nature 453.7197 (2008): 869-878.
[2] Kohno, Satoru, et al. "Water-diffusion slowdown in the human
visual cortex on visual stimulation precedes vascular responses." Journal
of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 29.6 (2009): 1197-1207.
[3] Flint, Jeremy, et al. "Diffusion weighted
magnetic resonance imaging of neuronal activity in the hippocampal slice
model." Neuroimage 46.2 (2009): 411-418.
[4] Le Bihan, Denis, et al. "Direct and fast detection of neuronal
activation in the human brain with diffusion MRI." Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 103.21 (2006): 8263-8268.
[5] Tsurugizawa, Tomokazu, Luisa Ciobanu, and Denis Le Bihan.
"Water diffusion in brain cortex closely tracks underlying neuronal
activity." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110.28 (2013):
11636-11641.
[6] Bai, Ruiliang, et al. "Assessing the sensitivity of diffusion
MRI to detect neuronal activity directly." Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 113.12 (2016): E1728-E1737.
[7] Miller, Karla L., et al. "Evidence for a vascular contribution
to diffusion FMRI at high b value." Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 104.52 (2007): 20967-20972.
[8] Deisseroth, Karl, et al. "Next-generation optical technologies
for illuminating genetically targeted brain circuits." The Journal of
Neuroscience 26.41 (2006): 10380-10386.
[9] Lee, J., et al. "Optogenetic Functional Magnetic Resonance
Imaging (ofMRI): Genetically Targeted In Vivo Brain Circuit Mapping."
Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. Vol. 18. 2010.
[10] Shepherd, Timothy M., Stephen J. Blackband, and Edward D. Wirth.
"Simultaneous diffusion MRI measurements from multiple perfused rat
hippocampal slices." Magnetic resonance in medicine 48.3 (2002): 565-569.
[11] Lein, Pamela J., Christopher D. Barnhart, and Isaac N. Pessah.
"Acute hippocampal slice preparation and hippocampal slice cultures."
In Vitro Neurotoxicology: Methods and Protocols (2011): 115-134.
[12] Flint, Jeremy, et al. "Diffusion weighted
magnetic resonance imaging of neuronal activity in the hippocampal slice model."
Neuroimage 46.2 (2009): 411-418.