Jon Orlando Cleary1, Amanda Ng1, Camille Shanahan1,2, Yasmin Blunck1, Myrte Strik1,2, Brad A Moffat1, Trevor J Kilpatrick2, Roger J Ordidge1, and Scott C. Kolbe1,2
1Melbourne Brain Centre Imaging Unit, Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia, 2MS Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
Synopsis
Multiple sclerosis (MS)
is typically characterised by hyperintense T2 white matter lesions. However,
the quantity and location of these may not correlate to a patient’s functional
state or impending disease progression. Quantitative susceptibility mapping
(QSM) is an emerging biomarker associated with tissue iron concentration and
regions of demyelination in white matter. This pilot study examined both clinical and MRI parameter relationships to the QSM value over a number of
brain regions in patients with mild (EDSS =or<2)
relapsing and remitting MS.
Purpose and Background
Multiple
sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, demyelinating inflammatory condition diagnosed
radiologically by the presence of hyperintense white matter lesions on T2-weighted
sequences(1). However, the quantity and location of these lesions often does
not correlate to a patient’s functional state or give warning of disease
progression. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) (2,3) is an emerging biomarker
for a number of neurodegenerative diseases and an increasing susceptibility
value, strongly associated with higher iron concentration (particularly
in deep grey matter structures) (4,5) and regions of demyelination in white matter.
We performed a pilot study to assess possible relationships in the QSM value to
both clinical and other MRI parameters, in mild (Expanded Disability Status
Scale, EDSS =or<2) relapsing and remitting MS patients. This may
give us some insight into the effect size needed for more comprehensive QSM
evaluations. Additionally, as the magnitude of the susceptibility value depends
on main magnetic field strength, we hypothesised that 7T MRI could be more
sensitive to regional differences in these patients with low disability scores. Methods
All
imaging was conducted with approval of the University of Melbourne Human
Research Ethics Committee. 10 age-matched subjects (4 healthy controls, 6 MS
patients, age 33-56 yrs) were recruited for this study. Group characteristics
are displayed in Table 1. MRI was conducted on a 7T research system (Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), using a 32-channel receive/volume transmit head
coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington MA, USA). 9-echo bipolar 3D gradient-echo images
were acquired for QSM calculation (TEs/TR/FA:5-21ms/24ms/13°,0.75mm-iso). MP2RAGE comprising a structural image
and T1 map (TE/TR/TIs/FAs:2.9ms/4.9s/0.7+2.7s/5+6°, 0.9mm-iso resolution), 2D FLAIR (TE/TR/TI:96ms/10s/2.6s,
0.3x0.3x4mm) were also acquired for lesion detection. Post-processing pipeline:
All images were rigidly registered (niftyReg, TIG UCL)(6) to a bias-field
corrected version of the 1st echo image used for QSM. MP2RAGE-UNIDEN
anatomical volumes were then processed in Freesurfer (v6 dev. build July 2016)(7) using the -hires flag. QSM processing: After discarding even echoes in the
GRE acquisition, phase unwrapping was performed with FUDGE(8), background phase
removal using V-SHARP and final QSM calculation using iLSQR (both part of STI
Suite, Duke University). Final values used the mean QSM data from
all 5 echo maps. Regions from the Freesurfer ‘aseg’ segmentation volume was used
to create regional volumes and measure quantitative T1 and QSM
values.Results
Automated Freesurfer segmentation
fitted plausible brain anatomy from the 7T MP2RAGE structural image in all
subjects. In particular, the deep grey matter structures (globus pallidus,
putamen and caudate) corresponded well visually to regions of high susceptibility
on QSM maps (representative subject in Figure 1).
Despite low EDSS scores,
lesion volume was found to vary across all 6 patients (range 66 to 9351mm3),
in a non-Gaussian manner and was log transformed. Computing the correlation
coefficient (R) of regional QSM values to clinical and MR parameters in the
patient group, we found associations between age, EDSS, regional T1
value and TIV-normalised volume (summarised in table 2). The strongest
associations were with QSM values in the thalamus and palladium. Discussion and Conclusion
This pilot study aimed to perform regional measurements of
magnetic susceptibility in patients with relapsing-remitting MS using QSM at
ultra high field. Despite the small number of patients studied, we observed
strong correlations between QSM values in several subcortical grey matter
structures and disease severity and demographic variables. We noted higher
susceptibility associated with age and EDSS in the iron rich structure, the
palladium, indicating iron deposition associated with neurodegeneration as has
previously been reported(4,5). Additionally, we observed lower susceptibility
in the thalamus that was associated with age, EDSS, lesion volume and thalamic
volume. These changes could indicate differences in the ratio of grey and white
matter in this cytoarchitecturally complex structure. This pilot work forms
part of an ongoing study examining MRI correlates of motor and gait
disturbances in MS and suggests that the QSM value may offer information into
disease state. Acknowledgements
J.O.C.
is supported by a University of Melbourne McKenzie Fellowship. S.C.K. is supported by the National Health and Medical
Research Council. We thank Siemens
Healthcare for technical assistance and access to the works-in-progress MRI
sequences mentioned. The MBCIU 7T MRI system and A.N. are supported by the
Australian National Imaging Facility (NIF). High-performance computing support
provided by the Multi-modal Australian ScienceS Imaging and Visualisation
Environment (MASSIVE).References
1. Rovira,
À., Wattjes, M. P., Tintoré, M., Tur, C., Yousry, T. A., Sormani, M. P., et al.
(2015). Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of
MRI in multiple sclerosis-clinical implementation in the diagnostic process. Nature
Reviews Neurology, 11(8), 471–482.
2. Haacke EM, Liu S, Buch S,
Zheng W, Wu D, Ye Y. Quantitative
susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions. Magn
Reson Imaging. 2015 Jan;33(1):1-25.
3. Liu C, Wei H,
Gong NJ,
Cronin M,
Dibb R,
Decker K Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping:
Contrast Mechanisms and Clinical Applications. Tomography. 2015
Sep;1(1):3-17.
4. Langkammer
C, Liu T, Khalil M, Enzinger C, Jehna M, Fuchs S, Fazekas F, Wang Y, Ropele S.
Quantitative susceptibility mapping in multiple sclerosis. Radiology 2013, 267(2), 551–9
5. Zivadinov
R, Heininen-Brown M, Schirda CV et al. Abnormal subcortical deep-gray matter
susceptibility-weighted imaging filtered phase measurements in patients with
multiple sclerosis: a case-control study. NeuroImage 2012;59:331-339.
6. Modat M, et al. (http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/component/content/article/software/niftyreg)
7. Fischl, B., van der Kouwe, A., Destrieux, C., Halgren, E., Segonne, F., Salat, D.H., Busa, E., Seidman, L.J., Goldstein, J., Kennedy, D., Caviness, V., Makris, N., Rosen, B., Dale, A.M., 2004b. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 14, 11-22.
8. Ng
A et al. Fast Unwrapping Using Discrete Gradient Evaluation (FUDGE): An
Analytical Correction to the Laplacian-Based Phase Unwrapping Technique for
Discrete Data. Proc ISMRM Singapore 2016 #27