Peter Adany1, Douglas R. Denney2, In-Young Choi1,3,4, Erica B. Sherry1, Abbey J. Hughes2, Sharon G. Lynch3, and Phil Lee1,4
1Hoglund Brain Imaging Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States, 2Psychology, University of Kansas, 3Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States, 4Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
Synopsis
Thalamic
pathology has been linked to long-term accumulation of disability and cognitive
impairment in MS. However, assessment of thalamic volume is highly challenging
for automatic as well as manual segmentation techniques. The use of multiple image
contrasts may improve segmentation quality. We investigated correlations of
thalamic volume and cognitive performance in MS. We evaluated automatic
segmentation and our new semi-manual segmentation using T1 and proton-density
MRI. Results based on FreeSurfer segmentation failed to yield correlations of
thalamic volume with cognitive performance in MS patients. Using semi-manual
segmentation, significant correlations were found between cognitive impairment
and regional thalamic atrophy in MS.
Introduction
Pathology
of the thalamus may be an early indicator of long-term accumulation of
disability and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS) [1-3]. Assessment
of thalamic volume requires anatomical image segmentation, which is often performed
using automated tools such as FreeSurfer [4] and FSL:FIRST [5]. However, accurate
segmentation of the thalamus is highly challenging due to a lack of contrast
and vague boundaries of the surrounding anatomy. Segmentation errors tend to reduce the
apparent correlation with other clinical measures, resulting in a failure to
yield significance in correlations with cognitive performance. Recent developments
in the use of multiple image contrasts for both automatic and manual thalamus
segmentation [6-7] underscore a need to improve segmentation methods,
particularly deep brain structures including the thalamus. In this study, we aimed
to investigate 1) the reliabiblity of automatic segmentation and our new semi-manual
segmentation using multiple image constrasts and 2) correlations of thalamic
volume and cognitive performance (e.g., information processing speed and memory)
in MS.Methods
A
total of 66
patients with MS (MS) and 31 healthy controls (HC) were studied. The ratio of
females to males was MS 37/29 and HC 15/16. There were no significant
differences between groups in terms of age, education or sex. Semi-manual
segmentation of the thalamus was performed based on co-registered MPRAGE and
proton density-weighted images [Jim6, Xinapse Systems]. Our new semi-manual segmentation workflow uses
a novel interpolation scheme, which produces smoothly contoured 3D segmentation
from a reduced number of manually edited slices as reported previously [8].
Automatic segmentation of the thalamus was performed using FreeSurfer based on
the MPRAGE images. The left, right and combined thalamic volumes were measured from
both FreeSurfer and semi-manual segmentation methods. All volumes were
normalized by the volume of the intracranial cavity (determined by manual
segmentation). Subjects performed cognitive tests including the Symbol Digit Modalities
Test (SDMT), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and Brief Visual Memory
Test (BVMT). All MRI data were acquired using a 3 T Siemens scanner (Skyra,
Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). MRI included T2 and proton density-weighted MRI
using a dual-echo spin-echo sequence (TE = 9, 90 ms, TR = 4000 ms, slice
thickness = 3 mm, FOV = 240 x 240 mm2, matrix = 256 x 256, and scan time = 7
min) and 3D T1-weighted MRI using an MPRAGE sequence (TE/TR = 4.4/2500 ms, TI =
1100 ms, resolution = 1 x 1 x 1 mm3, and scan time = 8 min).Results and Discussion
The
right and total thalamic volumes were significantly lower in patients with MS for
both FreeSurfer and semi-manual segmentation. FreeSurfer segmentation overestimated the left
thalamic volume compared with semi-manual segmentation, and the overestimation
was more pronounced in MS than in HC. The difference between MS and HC in left
thalamic volume was not significant with either FreeSurfer or semi-manual
segmentation. However, the correlation
between left and right thalamic volumes was smaller for FreeSurfer (0.77) than
for semi-manual segmentation (0.92). The correlations between FreeSurfer and semi-manual
volumes were 0.50 (left), 0.66 (right), and 0.62 (total). The correlations of
thalamic volumes with cognitive performance of patients with MS were
significant only with semi-manual segmentation of the thalamus (Table 1). Significant
correlations were found between cognitive impairment and regional thalamic
atrophy in MS only for the volumes obtained by semi-manual segmentation. FreeSurfer
tended to overestimate the left thalamus volume and yielded overall poor
correlation with cognitive impairment in MS based on left, right and combined
hemispheres. Our findings based on semi-manual segmentation support a link
between thalamic pathology and impairment of memory and information processing
speed. However, a failure to find correlations with the FreeSurfer results
suggests a need for caution in using automated segmentation tools. We conclude
that semi-manual segmentation of the thalamus from multiple MRI contrasts
demonstrated higher accuracy, while the use of an improved interpolation
technique greatly facilitated the manual editing task. This method may allow larger
studies to benefit from reliable anatomical volume measures with improved segmentation.Acknowledgements
This
study was partly supported by National Multiple Sclerosis Society
(RG 4495-A-4)
and NIH (UL1TR000001, P20GM103418). The Hoglund Brain Imaging
Center is supported by the NIH (S10RR029577) and the Hoglund
Family Foundation.References
Mesaros, S. et al. Am J
Neuroradiol; 32(6), 1016-1020 (2011).
Minagar, A. et al.
Neurology; 80(2), 210-219 (2013).
Schoonheim, M. M. et
al. Neurology; 84(8), 776-783 (2015).
Fischl, B. et al.
Neuron; 33(3), 341-355 (2002).
Patenaude, B. et al.
Neuroimage; 56(3), 907-922 (2011).
Spinks, R. et al.
Neuroimage; 17(2), 631-642 (2002).
Power, B.D. et al.
Psychiatry Res.; 232(1), 98-105 (2015).
Adany, P. et al. Proc.
Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med; 23, 3755 (2015).