Shiho Isoshima1, Masayuki Maeda2, Katsuhiro Inoue1, Ryohei Nakayama3, Shinichi Takase1, Tsunehiro Yamahata1, and Hajime Sakuma4
1Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Mie, Japan, 2Department of Advanced Diagnostic Imaging, Mie University School of Medicine, Mie, Japan, 3Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan, 4Department of Radiology, Mie University School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
Synopsis
Quantitative
assessment of carotid plaque burden is required to monitor the effects of
treatments for carotid atherosclerosis. Cervical carotid plaque volume in 13
patients with carotid artery stenosis was measured and evaluated using manual
and automated software methods for 3D T1 black-blood MRI. Measurement
reproducibility was better using the automated method than that using the
manual method. The
automated software developed for the measurement of carotid plaque volume was
feasible and reliable and could significantly reduce the measurement time. This method appears
to be of great value in clinical settings.
INTRODUCTION
Three dimensional T1 black-blood MRI (3D T1 BB MRI) is
widely used in clinical settings. This method may be useful for measuring
plaque volume in cases of carotid artery stenosis because the method’s improved
anatomical coverage with retrospective visualization of the vessel wall using
multiplanar reconstruction. Previously, investigators manually measured
carotid-plaque volume to monitor the progression of atherosclerotic carotid
plaque in patients receiving statin therapy [1] or to evaluate the carotid
plaque burden in patients before carotid artery stenting [2]. However, manually
measuring plaque volume is painful and time consuming. Therefore, we developed a
software to automate the measurement of carotid-plaque volume.
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to compare manual
and automated measurements of plaque volume in cervical carotid atherosclerosis
and to assess the feasibility and the clinical usefulness of the automated
software for the measurement of plaque volume in clinical settings.MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirteen
patients with high-signal plaque in the cervical carotid arteries (mean age: 76
years) were studied to compare manual and automated measurements of carotid
plaques.
We used 3T MRI (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands) with a dS HeadNeckSpine
coil for imaging. The imaging-sequence parameters of 3D T1 BB MRI were:
T1-VISTA, TR/TE = 350/23, refocusing angle = 40°, matrix = 0.45 × 0.45 × 0.90 mm, and scan
time = 4 min 23 s. With
the automation software, T1 BB images were converted into isotropic voxels. A
seed point was manually selected in the center of a carotid plaque (Fig. 1).
After the software performed smoothing and region-growing processes, plaque
extraction images were obtained (Fig. 2). The plaque volume was calculated
based on these images.
Regarding data analyses,
plaque volume was independently measured by two “raters” using the manual method
and the software. Analyses of
data obtained by the manual and automated methods for plaque-volume measurement
included assessment of
reproducibility regarding
inter-raters and intra-raters and assessment of validity. Spearman’s rank
correlation and Bland–Altman analysis were used for statistical analyses. In
addition, measurement time was
assessed for the manual and automated methods.RESULTS
Reproducibility of the manual method
showed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.986 in intra-raters and
ICC of 0.98 in inter-raters. Reproducibility of the automated method showed ICC
of 1.00 in intra-raters and ICC of 0.999 in inter-raters. A Bland–Altman
analysis of the data showed that validity of the automated method was
significant (r = 0.945, Fig. 3). Measurement time was much shorter with the
automated method than that with the manual method (81.7 ± 7.8 vs. 189.5 ± 49.6 seconds, p < 0.01).DISCUSSION
We have shown that the developed automated software
for the measurement of carotid-plaque volume is feasible and reliable in
clinical settings. There was a significant correlation between the plaque volumes measured
by the manual and the automated methods. Measurement
reproducibility was better with the automated method. The automated software could significantly reduce the
measurement time and it appears to be of great value in clinical settings.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Boussel
L, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque progression in
carotid arteries: monitoring with high-spatial-resolution MR
imaging--multicenter trial. Radiology 2009, 252:
789-96.
2. Tanemura
H, et al. High-risk plaque for carotid artery
stenting evaluated with 3-dimensional T1-weighted gradient echo sequence. Stroke 2013, 44: 105-10.