Atherosclerotic carotid plaque morphology and plaque composition may identify unstable or vulnerable plaque that defines higher risk. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability to identify all major carotid plaque components in in-vivo 3T, ex-vivo 7T MRI and correlation with histology.
Datasets were obtained from 30 selected symptomatic stroke patients (71±15 years). Subjects were imaged using 3T MR scanner (Sigma Excite, GE). T1-weighted (T1-w) pre/post contrast, T2-weighted (T2-w), Proton Density-weighted (PD-w) and MRA time-of-flight (ToF) scans were carried out. T1-w, T2-w and PD-w were carried out with 0.27x0.27x2.8 mm3 resolution and ToF 0.46x0.46x1.9 mm3. From the patients studied in-vivo, 14 of them underwent CEA. Thirty-three endarterectomy cross-sections, from 13 patients, were studied. The specimens from these patients were imaged on a Bruker Biospec Avance system using a 7T horizontal 30 cm bore magnet. Carotid plaque specimens were imaged in a sealed syringe filled with fomblin, to reduce susceptibility artefacts. A small phantom containing MgCl2 was placed within the field of view as a standard. T1-w, T2-w (100x100x100 μm3 isotropic resolution) and diffusion weighted images (DWI) (181x181x181 μm3 isotropic resolution) were carried out. Serial sections of the specimens were taken and stained with haematoxylin-eosin and Elastic van Gieson. Digital images of the histological preparations were acquired at 0.54x0.54 μm2 resolution. Histological correlation with the in-vivo 3T and ex-vivo 7T MRI data was carried out. All the images of the different modalities were co-registered using a commercial package Analyze (Biomedical Imaging Resource, Mayo Foundation).
Semiautomated segmentation methods were used to measure areas of different plaque components2. Bland-Altman plots and mean difference with 95% confidence interval were carried out.
There was general quantitative agreement between areas derived from semi-automated segmentation of MRI data and histology measurements.
3T MRI vs Histology
The mean differences and 95% confidence bounds in the relative to total plaque area between 3T versus Histology were: fibrous tissue 4.99%(-4.56 to 14.56), lipid-rich/necrotic core (LR/NC) with hemorrhage -1.81%(-14.11 to 10.48), LR/NC without hemorrhage -2.43%(-13.04 to 8.17), and calcification -3.18%(-11.55 to 5.18).
7T MRI vs Histology
The mean differences and 95% confidence bounds in the relative to total plaque area between 7T and histology were: fibrous tissue 3.17%(-3.17 to 9.52), LR/NC with hemorrhage -0.55%(-9.06 to 7.95), LR/NC without hemorrhage -12.62%(-19.8 to -5.45), and calcification -2.43%(-9.97 to 4.73).
1. Hankey GJ. Stroke Treatment and Prevention: An Evidence-Based Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2005:255-87.
2. Saam T et al Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 2005; 25:234-239.