Gina Kirkish1, Anisha Keshavan1, Nancy Byl2, William Stern1, Stacy Hatcher1, Tracy Luks3, and Roland Henry1,3
1Department of Neuology, University of California, San Francisco, San Fransisco, CA, United States, 2Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California, San Francisco, 3Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
Synopsis
A paradigm was developed to evaluate neural pathophysiology of
gait and turning in individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) using fMRI.
BOLD
signal change of imagined walking and turning was compared to resting state
activation in PD patients and controls. Subjects performed physical
examinations including the Timed Up and Go (TUG) task, ten-meter walk and a timed
360-degree turn to assess motor performance. Brain activity was compared between
groups and to motor performance. This study
concluded that a neural correlate of the TUG task exists in BOLD signal change in
the premotor and primary motor area when imagining-turning compared to imagining-walking.
Introduction
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a highly
prevalent, neurodegenerative movement disorder
4. Gait disturbances
and postural instability, symptoms that produce the highest incidence of
morbidity in individuals with PD
7, respond poorly to dopaminergic
treatment
. The neural correlates underlying these disabilities are
currently uncharacterized. It is essential to identify early, quantitative
biomarkers that correlate with clinical motor outcomes as PD progresses. The
Timed-Up and Go (TUG) task is a clinical marker for PD. It integrates several
motor components including gait speed, initiation of movement, and turning –
and performance does not significantly improve with dopaminergic therapy
3.
A fMRI paradigm was developed in order to quantitatively evaluate neural
correlates related to PD motor dysfunction, which could be directly compared to
performance on the TUG task
2.
Methods
fMRI brain activation patterns of 11 patients
with PD and in 11 age-matched controls were compared. During a six-minute randomized fMRI block exam,
subjects were asked to imagine themselves walking, imagine themselves turning
in 360-degree circles, and rest. A structural, whole brain T1-weighted MPRAGE,
(TR 2300 ms, TE 3 ms, TI 900 ms; 1x1x1 mm3 resolution) and a GE-EPI fMRI
sequence (TR 1200 ms, TE 30 ms, 306 volumes, 2.50×2.50×2.50 mm resolution) was acquired. Motor performance on three physical tests - the TUG task, 10-meter
walk test and timed 360-degree turn were also recorded. Activation maps of fMRI
data were created to visualize four signal contrasts (imagined-turning versus
rest, imagined-walking versus rest, imagined-turning and imagined-walking
versus rest, and imagined-turning versus imagined-walking). Functional
supplementary motor area (SMA) ROIs were selected using activation clusters in
the SMA (t-stat threshold = 2mm). The t-statistic data across all subjects was
normalized to MNI space and was compared between the two groups and four
contrasts with performance on motor examinations. Results
There were no detectable
differences between the outcomes on the physical tasks, the TUG, 10-meter walk,
or a 360-degree turn between patients with PD and controls. Cortical activation
in the supplementary motor area (SMA) was localized in all subjects during
motor imagery tasks (Figure 1). No
significant differences were found between patients and controls relative to
SMA activation. Individuals with PD had a significant increase in lateral
occipital lobe activation when imagining-turning compared to imagining-walking (Figure 2, 3). Activity in the
premotor and primary motor area during the imagined-turning versus
imagined-walking contrast was significantly correlated to performance on the
TUG test for both groups (Figure 3, 4). Activation in the precuneus was correlated with performance on
the 360-degree turn during the imagined-turning condition (Figure 3). Activation in the occipital gyrus was correlated with
the 10-meter walk for several motor imagery contrasts (Figure 3). Discussion
This study concludes that
SMA activation was documented in all subjects during the motor imagery task. It
is promising this block design yielded distinct motor activation patterns among
subjects and between task conditions. Significantly higher BOLD signal
response was found in the lateral occipital region for patients with PD during the
imagined-turning condition, but not the imagined-walking condition. This may
indicate that individuals with PD recruit more of their visual network to compensate
for turning disability. Individuals with slower TUG task results had an
increase in premotor and primary motor activation during imagined-turning,
compared to imagined-walking. This suggests a possible correlation between
turning disability and increased recruitment of premotor and primary motor
activity. Hyperactivity to the premotor and primary motor areas could be
attributed as adaptive plasticity of the motor system, due to deficient
projections to the motor pathway2,5,6. The medial
part of BA6, or the SMA, is more involved in the activation that relates to TUG
performance and imagined-turning, than to imagined-walking. It is possible that
the disturbance in the basal ganglia could result in over-activation in the
SMA, and disturb eventual movement execution1. It is significant that there is a distinction between the
imagined-turning and imagined-walking outcomes because turning requires more
postural balance and attention compared to forward ambulation. Conclusion
The focus of
this study was to evaluate neural activation patterns in patients with PD and
healthy controls as potential biomarkers, which relate to clinical motor
outcomes. Identifying a neural biomarker is essential for future treatments to
be targeted and tested. This study concluded that a neural correlate of the TUG
task exists in BOLD signal change in the premotor and primary motor area when
imagining-turning compared to imagining-walking. Assessing the relationship
between postural instability and the corresponding functional brain areas has
the potential to increase our understanding of the breakdown of motor control
in PD. Acknowledgements
With greatest appreciation to Dr. Roland
Henry for his guidance and management of this study, and for his unending
support, advice and enthusiasm for neurological imaging research. Special
thanks to Ph.D. student Anisha Keshavan whose proficiency in fMRI design and
processing helped guide this study. I would like to thank Tracy Luks for her help with the fMRI study
design, and Nancy Byl for her help in advising this study and managing the
motor performance tests. I am grateful to
Stacy Hatcher for her help in coordinating the patients for this study.
Thank you to all the members in Roland Henry’s lab for their advice and input
during this study.References
1. Borrione,
Paolo, Tranchita, Eliana, et al. Effects of physical activity in Parkinson’s
disease: A new tool for rehabilitation. World Journal of Methodology 2014;
4(3): 133-143.
2. Buhmann,
C., et al. Abnormal excitability of premotor-motor connections in de novo
Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2005; 127 (12) 2732-2746.
3. Franzén,
Erika, et al. Reduced performance in balance, walking and turning tasks is associated
with increased neck tone in Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Neurology 2009;
219(2):430–4.
4. Olanow,
C.W., Tatton, W.G. Etiology and pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Annual
Review of Neuroscience 1999; Pages 123-144.
5. Sabatini,
U, Boulanour K, et al. Cortical motor reorganization in akinetic patients with
Parkinson’s disease: a functional MRI study. Brain 2000; 123 (Pt 2):394-403.
6. Udupta,
Kaviraja and Chen, Robert. Motor cortical plasticity in Parkinson’s disease.
Frontiers in Neurology 2013; 4: 128.
7. Wood,
BH, JA Bilclough. Incidence and prediction of falls in Parkinson's disease: a
prospective multidisciplinary study. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery
Psychiatry 2002; 72:721-725.