Sean K Sethi1, Shawn Kisch2, Kiarash Ghassaban1, Saifeng Liu3, Miller Fawaz1, Ali H. Rajput4, Alex Rajput4, Paul Babyn5, Peter Szkup5, and E. Mark Haacke1,3,6
1Research, Magnetic Resonance Innovations, Inc., Detroit, MI, United States, 2Department of Medical Imaging, Saskatoon Health Region, 3Research, The MRI Institute for Biomedical Research, Detroit, MI, United States, 4Division of Neurology in the Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 5Department of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, 6Radiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine
Synopsis
Iron deposition
in the brain has been implicated in neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson’s
Disease. We used quantitative susceptibility mapping to evaluate iron content in the substantia nigra
and red nucleus in 18 patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s Disease (IPD). Susceptibility
was calculated for whole structure and a thresholded high-iron region (RII) and
compared with controls. We found that global and RII mean susceptibility higher
in the substantia nigra compared with normals, and that the slope of RII susceptibility
vs age is higher in IPD compared to normals which may suggest an increased rate
of iron deposition at disease onset.
PURPOSE
Iron
deposition in the brain has been implicated in the role of neurodegenerative
disease and normal aging, and thus is of great interest to researchers and
clinicians. Assessing iron content in the brain with MR imaging is frequently performed
using R2*, which is a sum of the relaxation due to spin-spin interactions and
local susceptibility effects1. Some of the drawbacks of R2* iron
measurement, however, are that it is less sensitive than phase and
susceptibility and its accuracy is dependent on imaging parameters, orientation,
and SNR1. More recently, a technique called quantitative
susceptibility mapping (QSM) has been of interest for researchers and
clinicians studying brain iron. The technique uses magnitude and unfiltered
phase SWI data to create a susceptibility map (SM) of the tissue. These SMs are
directly proportional to iron content and help to visualize areas where iron is
more prominent, especially in deep gray matter nuclei2,3. Our group
has previously used this technique on 174 healthy controls to establish an age-dependent
baseline of iron deposition in the midbrain using QSM4. In this
work, we assessed iron content in the midbrain of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients
using QSM to evaluate iron in the entire structure of interest as well as the
novel concept of evaluating the properties of the high-iron content region.
Using regional analysis shows higher correlation between age and
iron deposition compared to a global approach, providing a reliable and
sensitive reference for what can be considered normal iron content for studies
of neurodegenerative diseases. METHODS
Eighteen
patients with mild to moderate Idiopathic Parkinson’s Disease (IPD) were imaged
with a 3T Skyra system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 20-channel head/neck
coil with a venous imaging protocol5. Multi-echo SWI imaging was
performed with the following parameters, TE: 6 and 20 ms, TR: 30 ms, FA: 15°, and
resolution: 0.5x0.5x2.0 mm3. Because several of the cases were
subject to cusp artifacts, magnitude and phase images were reconstructed using
the original channel data using an in-house Matlab-based software to mitigate
these effects6. QSM images were reconstructed by using our in-house
Matlab based toolbox SMART 2.0 (MRI Institute for Biomedical Research, Detroit,
MI, USA). Four steps were applied to generate the resulting QSM images: brain
extraction7, phase unwrapping8, background field removal9,
and an iterative QSM approach2,10. Upon QSM generation, the
boundaries for the substantia nigra (SN) and red nucleus (RN) were manually
traced followed by global and regional analyses of iron content as a function
of age using previously established methods4. Mean susceptibility of
all structures is reported for global (whole) and high iron (RII) regions. RESULTS
Fifteen IPD patients were included in the study with a mean age of 60.3 years
(SD=6.9), and three patients were excluded where cusp artifacts could not be
corrected. Mean global susceptibility for the right and left SN were 172 ppb
(SD=32) and 170 ppb (SD=43), respectively. For the right and left RN, mean
global susceptibility was 104 ppb (SD=30.0) and 94 ppb (SD=28). RII mean susceptibility
for the right and left SN was 232 ppb (SD=25) and 241 ppb (SD=35). For the
right and left RN, RII mean susceptibility was 184 ppb (SD=14) and 195 (SD=11).
In an unpaired two-tailed t-test comparing RII iron content between IPD and
normals within the same age range (n=62), the IPD group showed higher iron in
the RN (p=0.03) and SN (p<0.001). Plots
depicting RII mean susceptibility vs. age, along with their regression lines
compared to controls4 are shown for the right and left RN and SN
(Figures 1-4). DISCUSSION
No
apparent differences in mean iron were observed globally for the RN. The SN,
however, not only had higher global iron content, but also much higher regional
iron content compared to controls. The slopes of the linear regression lines
(Figure 3-4) were also steeper compared with previously published controls
which may suggest an increased rate of iron deposition after the disease onset.
An advantage of using RII compared to global regional analysis is that the
variability of the results decreases and it is generally a more robust approach4.
Any errors generally present in estimating volumes of the structure itself are
removed because low iron regions are naturally excluded. Still the number of
cases is limited and more subjects should be collected. Another difficulty was
imaging severe IPD cases because of motion. Faster scanning may make it
possible to extract these iron measurements in the future. CONCLUSION
QSM
using a two-region approach was a successful and robust method in showing
differences in iron content between some IPD patients and healthy controls. Acknowledgements
We would like acknowledge MR Innovations India for assistance with MRI data processing.References
1.
Daugherty
AM, Raz N. Appraising the Role of Iron in Brain Aging and Cognition: Promises
and Limitations of MRI Methods. Neuropsychol Rev 2015;25:272-287
2.
Haacke, E.M., et al., Susceptibility
mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify
oxygen saturation. J Magn Reson
Imaging, 2010. 32(3): p. 663-76.
3.
Haacke
EM, Liu S, Buch S, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status
and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging 2015;33:1-25.
4.
Liu M, Liu S, Ghassaban K, et al.
Assessing global and regional iron content in deep gray matter as a function of
age using susceptibility mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015.
5.
Utriainen
D, Feng W, Elias S, et al. Using magnetic resonance imaging as a means to study
chronic cerebral spinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis patients.
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2012;15:101-112.
6.
Liu,
S. Ye, Y. et al. Multi-channel Data Combination with Linear Phase Baseline
Correction. ISMRM 23rd Annual Meeting & Exhibition, May 30 – June 5, 2015,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
7.
Rorden,
C., Brett, M. (2000). Stereotaxic display of brain lesions.Behavioural
Neurology. 12, 191-200
8.
Abdul-Rahman,
H.S., et al., Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase
unwrapping algorithm. Appl Opt,
2007. 46(26): p. 6623-35.
9.
Schweser,
F., et al., Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using
MRI signal phase: an approach to in
vivo brain iron metabolism? Neuroimage, 2011.
54(4): p. 2789-807.
10. Tang, J., et al., Improving
susceptibility mapping using a threshold-based K-space/image
domain iterative reconstruction
approach. Magn Reson Med, 2013. 69(5): p. 1396-407.