Xiaofei Hu1, Yuchao Jiang2, Xiaoyue Zhou3, Cheng Luo2, and Jian Wang1
1Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, P.R. China, Chongqing, People's Republic of China, 2Key Laboratory for Neuro Information of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu, 610054, P.R. China, People's Republic of China, 3Collaboration NEA, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Shanghai, P.R. China, People's Republic of China
Synopsis
In the current study, combined functional
connectivity density (FCD) and seed-based FC analyses
were performed to fully characterize the abnormal brain networks in the two
subtypes. Our findings obtained using a combination of FCD and
seed-based FC analyses provide consistent evidence for that the network
disorganization of the brains in the two PD subtypes were different.We also found that the FCD provided good
discrimination between the AR and TD patients. These findings have important implications for
understanding the neural substrates that underlie these disparate
manifestations of PD.
Background
Parkinson’s disease
(PD) can be classified into tremor-dominant (TD) and akinetic-rigid (AR)
subtypes, each of which exhibits a unique clinical course and prognosis1,2.
However, the neural basis for these disparate manifestations is not well
understood. This study comprehensively investigated the altered functional
integration of these two subtypes.Methods
25 TD patients, 25 AR patients and 26 normal control subjects were
studied. Motor performance of patients was quantitatively and accurately
assessed in detail by using the motor section (part III) of the Unified
Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Hoehn and Yahr scale. Afterwards,
the mean scores of TD and
AR were computed, respectively 3,4.
Resting-state functional images were acquired using a 3T MAGNETOM Trio (Siemens).
Imaging data were collected transversely by using an echo-planar imaging (EPI)
sequence with the following settings: TR = 2000 ms, TE = 30 ms, flip angle =
90°, FOV = 192×192mm2, in-plane matrix = 64×64, thickness=3 mm,
voxel size = 3.0 × 3.0 × 3.0mm3. For each subject, a total of 240
volumes were acquired with scan time of 480s. Data preprocessing was carried
out using Neuroscience Information Toolbox (NIT,
http://www.neuro.uestc.edu.cn/NIT.html). Functional MRI (fMRI) data were
analyzed using functional connectivity density (FCD) and seed-based functional
connectivity methods. For
each subject, both the global FCD map and the local FCD map were computed5,6. The brain sites identified by FCD group comparisons between the two
subtypes were used as seeds in subsequent functional connectivity analyses. To determine the effect of group, a voxel-based
one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used with age, gender, and
education level as covariates in both the FCD and FC analyses using REST
software. The mean FCD and FC values were extracted for post hoc analyses using
the least significant difference (LSD) t-test. The AFNI AlphaSim program
(http://afni.nih.gov/afni/docpdf/AlphaSim.pdf) was used to correct for multiple
comparisons7. Correlations between neuroimaging
measures and clinical variables were also calculated to investigate the relationships between each of the clinical variables and
the altered functional brain properties, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used
to evaluate the ability of the FCD measures to discriminate the PD subtypes.Results
Compared with the AR patients, significantly
increased global functional connectivity density in the cerebellum and
decreased global functional connectivity density in the left inferior frontal
gyrus, right middle frontal gyrus and right superior frontal gyrus were found
in the TD patients (P <0.05, AlphaSim corrected)
(Figure 1). Moreover, the identified
functional connectivity density correlated significantly with clinical variables
in the patients (spearman rank correlation
analyses, P < 0.05), and the results
of the ROC analysis indicated that the inclusion of the four FCD indices had
the highest power to discriminate the AR patients from the TD patients, with an
AUC of 0.96 (95% CI=0.91–1.00) (Figure 2). At a cutoff of 0.23, the sensitivity
and specificity were 95.2% and 80.9%, respectively. Furthermore, patients of the different subtypes demonstrated
different cerebello-cortical functional connectivity patterns (P <0.05, AlphaSim corrected) (Figure 3).Conclusions
These findings
indicate that the functional integration in the cerebellum and frontal lobe are
altered in both subtypes of PD. They also provide a new perspective for the
classification of PD subtypes based on a comprehensive view of network
disorganization in the two subtypes of PD.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.Lees AJ, Hardy J, Revesz T. Parkinson's disease. The Lancet;373(9680):2055-2066.
2.Zaidel A, Arkadir D, Israel Z, Bergman H. Akineto-rigid vs. tremor syndromes in Parkinsonism. Current opinion in neurology 2009;22(4):387-393.
3.Lewis MM, Du G, Sen S, et al. Differential involvement of striato- and cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathways in tremor- and akinetic/rigid-predominant Parkinson's disease. Neuroscience 2011;177:230-239.
4.Eggers C, Kahraman D, Fink GR, Schmidt M, Timmermann L. Akinetic-rigid and tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease patients show different patterns of FP-CIT single photon emission computed tomography. Movement disorders 2011;26(3):416-423.
5.Tomasi D, Volkow ND. Functional connectivity density mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010;107(21):9885-9890.
6.Tomasi D, Volkow ND. Functional connectivity hubs in the human brain. NeuroImage 2011;57(3):908-917.
7.Ledberg A, Akerman S, Roland PE. Estimation of the probabilities of 3D clusters in functional brain images. Neuroimage 1998;8(2):113-128.