XIUQIN JIA1, LIN SHI2, TIANYI QIAN3, YING LI1, DEFENG WANG4,5, PEIPENG LIANG1,4,5, and KUNCHENG LI1
1Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China, 2Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 3MR Collaboration, Northeast Asia, Siemens Healthcare, Beijing, People's Republic of China, 4Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China, 5Research Center for Medical Image Computing, Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Synopsis
The human
brain differs significantly between different individuals, as well as between different
demographics (i.e., age, gender, and race). The aim of the present study was to
investigate the effectiveness of a Chinese brain template, i.e., Chinese2020,
on the detection of grey matter (GM) alteration between patients with Parkinson’s
disease (PD) and healthy controls (HC). The results of this study indicate that
Chinese2020 was more representative of Chinese populations, which suggests that
neuroimaging studies based on Chinese populations should be normalized to the
Chinese brain atlas and that previous studies based on Chinese populations might
need to be updated.
Introduction
Human brains are highly varied among different demographics (e.g., gender,
age, and race). A recent study by our group has
demonstrated that the Chinese brain atlas improved accuracy and reduced anatomical
variability during registration, which suggests that a population-specific
brain atlas may be more appropriate for studies involving Chinese populations
[1]. In
addition to the effects of variable patient characteristics, such as age,
disease duration, and disease severity, the population-based brain atlas may
account for inconsistencies during spatial normalization between Chinese and
Caucasian populations. The aim of the present study was
to compare the grey matter alteration between Chinese PD patients and healthy
controls (HC) by using the a typical statistical Chinese brain template named
as Chinese2020 [1], which is based on more than two thousand Chinese subjects, and
by using the standard Caucasian brain atlas of MNI152, which was constructed
based on 152 Caucasian brains [2]. Methods
Fifteen PD
patients (8 males, 64.8±7.5 years old) and 15 gender- and age-matched HC (8 males,
59.8 ± 5.2 years old) were recruited in this study. All patients met the UK PD
Society Brain Bank criteria for the diagnosis of PD. Patients were assessed
with the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the Hoehn and
Yahr (HY) Scale while off medications. Cognitive state was assessed with the
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). MRI examinations were acquired using a MAGNETOM
Trio Tim 3T MR system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Three-dimensional (3D)
T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sagittal images
were collected. First, the original brain shape
and size were measured in the native space for PD patients and HCs. Then the
images were spatially normalized into both the MNI152 space and the Chinese2020
space. Seven metrics of brain shape and size were measured: AC-PC line
distance, length (rostral-caudal), width (left -right), height
(superior-inferior), width/length, height/length, and height/width.
The
T1-weighted anatomical images of each participant were segmented and normalized
into both MNI152 and Chinese2020 spaces using SPM8 (Statistical
Parametric Mapping, Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, London, UK).
The
GM maps from MNI152 and Chinese2020 spaces were analyzed using the
General Linear Model (GLM) on a voxel-wise comparison across the whole brain. An
absolute GM threshold of 0.2 was used to avoid possible edge effects around the
border between GM and WM both for MNI152 and Chinese2020 spaces. Two-sample t-tests were performed to identify grey matter alteration between
PD patients and HCs.
Results
In Table
1, which compares images registered to the MNI152 and to the Chinese2020, more
deformations were needed in brain shape and size when images were registered to
the MNI template than to the Chinese template. These results indicate that the
Chinese population better fit the Chinese template. The
detected brain atrophy of each atlas is presented in Figure 1. Compared to HCs,
significant GM atrophy in PD patients was detected by using the MNI152 template
in areas including the bilateral temporal lobe extending into the insula and the
hippocampus/parahippocampal gyrus, the left superior occipital cortex, the
precuneus/cuneus, and the right putamen. The atrophy within the aforementioned
regions was also detected using Chinese2020 but with a larger cluster size. Furthermore,
additional GM atrophies were revealed in the right middle/inferior occipital
cortex, the right precuneus, the right middle/superior/inferior frontal gyrus,
and the right orbitofrontal cortex in the Chinese2020 space. No increased grey
matter was observed in PD patients using either the MNI152 or Chinese2020 template. To compare the effectiveness of the Chinese2020 and the MNI152, the mean of GM percentage in the detected regions
based on the Chinese2020 (61.50 ± 5.09%) was
significantly higher (p < 0.05)
than that of the MNI152 (39.5 ± 8.96%). Discussion
Chinese brain morphology differs from that of Caucasians in regards
to shape and size. In the present study, the Chinese2020 template was employed to identify brain alteration differences between
PD patients and HCs in a Chinese population. Fewer deformations were required
to spatially normalize the Chinese population’s brain to Chinese2020 than to the
MNI atlas, which suggests that the Chinese2020 better represented
the characteristics of the Chinese population than the MNI152. Furthermore, the Chinese2020
template allowed for more accurate alignment than MNI152 and enhanced the sensitivity of MRI in detecting pathological
alterations in brain morphology as shown by the finding that Chinese2020 allowed for better GM atrophy detection in Chinese PD than MNI152.Conclusion
The present study indicates that the characteristics of Chinese
brains are better represented by the Chinese2020 template than the MNI152
template, which suggests that neuroimaging studies of Chinese populations
should be normalized to the Chinese brain atlas.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Liang
P, Shi L, Chen N, Luo Y, Wang X, Liu K, Mok VCT, Chu WCW, Wang D & Li K.
Construction of brain atlases based on a multi-center MRI dataset of 2020
Chinese adults. Sci Rep 5; 2015.
[2] Mazziotta, J. et al. A probabilistic
atlas and reference system for the human brain: international consortium for
brain mapping (ICBM). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 356, 1293–1322
(2001).