Tao Wu1, Jiayu Sun2, and Zhaoyang Fan3
1radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China, 2Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China, 3Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
Synopsis
The stroke is a common cause of death. The technique of
high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI) has been used to depict the
vessel wall. Our study aimed to evaluate thetherapeutic efficiency of the symptomatic
atherosclerotic plaque in middle cerebral artery by 3D High-resolution MRI. And we compared the imaging and clinical symptom before and after the therapy. The diagnosis of the imaging is consistent with the clinical symptom. 3D High-resolution
MRI is a potential imaging technology to evaluate therapeutic efficiency of atherosclerotic
plaque in middle cerebral artery.
Objective
Intracranial atherosclerosis is highly
associated with ischemic stroke, accounting for 8% to 10% of events in North
America and even higher in Asia[1]. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging
(HR-MRI), particularly using a 3D variable-flip-angle turbo spin-echo method,
has successfully been used to depict the intracranial vessel wall and
atherosclerotic lesions [2,3]. This 3D method was recently optimized and now
allows for whole-brain spatial coverage, superior signal suppression of
cerebrospinal fluid, and isotropic 0.5-mm spatial resolution within a
reasonable scan time of 7-8 minutes [4,5]. Our study aimed to evaluate the
feasibility of using the new technique to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of
medical therapy on symptomatic atherosclerotic plaques in the middle cerebral
artery.Materials and methods
Sixteen
patients who had recent clinical symptoms (transient ischemic attack or
ischemic stroke within the last 2 weeks) caused by intracranial atherosclerotic
stenosis >50% were recruited with informed consent. Exclusion criteria
included: general contraindications to MRI or contrast agent; emergent
interventional procedures performed or scheduled. Before initiation of medical
therapy, imaging was conducted on a 3.0 Tesla scanner (Tim Trio, Siemens
Medical Solution) with a 32-channel head coil. Patients underwent conventional
brain MRA (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T2 FLAIR as well as 3D TOF) followed by
T1-weighted whole-brain 3D high-resolution MRI before and after Gadolinium
injection. Statins therapy was then initiated in all subjects, and 94 days
(range: 7 – 130 days) later, the same imaging protocol was repeate. And we
calculated the plaque area (PA) and degree of stenosis before and after medical
therapy. We used the chi-square test to compare the degree of stenosis between improved
patient group and non-improved patient group before medical therapy, and t-test
to compare the plaque area between pre-therapy and post-therapy respectively. The
improvement in clinical symptoms in each subject was recorded.Results
With
the medical therapy, clinical symptoms of 10 patients were substantially
improved as measured by mRS (4-5 pre-therapy vs 1-3 post-therapy), and their the
plaque area were significantly reduced(PA=6.43±0.88(pre);4.33±1.42(post):P=0.001). In the remaining 6 patients, plaque area (PA=5.87±0.77(pre);5.48±0.76(post):P=0.:39) exhibited essentially no difference between pre- and
post-therapy. Between the two groups, PA and degree of stenosis exhibited no significantly
difference at the pre-therapy state. Discussion and Conclusion
The small cohort
study showed that the plaque area and degree of stenosis at the middle cerebral
artery are significantly reduced in symptomatic patients who show symptom
improvement by statin therapy but not changed in those who had no symptom
improvement. This suggests that high-resolution MRI may be used to provide an
imaging marker for treatment response to medical therapy. A larger cohort will
be needed to systematically validate the clinical utility.Acknowledgements
This work was funded by Whole Brain Vessel Wall Imaging in Stroke Patients: An International Multi-Center Registry(NO: NCT02923752)References
[1] Turan TN et al
Stroke 2009;40:2257.
[2] Qiao Y et al.
JMRI 2011;34:22.
[3] van der Kolk
AG et al. EurRadiol. 2013;23:2996.
[4] Fan Z et al.
MRM 2016; Feb 28.