The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of 4D Flow MRI to monitor the change of flow dynamics between before and after extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery. We enrolled 14 patients who underwent EC-IC bypass. In all, 5 patients underwent radial artery graft (RAG) bypass and 9 patients underwent superficial temporal artery (STA) bypass. All patients underwent 4D Flow MRI preoperatively and 3 weeks after surgery. We measured blood flow volume (BFV) of bilateral internal carotid artery (ICA), basilar artery (BA), and EC-IC bypass artery using 4D flow MRI. Post/pre-operative BFV ratio of contralateral ICA was statistically higher in patients with the RAG bypass group than in those with the STA bypass group (1.28±0.26 in RAG bypass group vs 0.94±0.14 in STA bypass group, p<0.01). 4D Flow MRI could assess comprehensive flow dynamics of EC-IC bypass surgery. It is feasible to clarify the change of contribution from each artery.
Introduction
Extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass is an option in carefully selected patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease and a complex intracranial aneurysm, although its use remains controversial. After EC-IC bypass surgery, each intracranial artery (i.e. internal carotid artery (ICA) and basilar artery (BA)) and bypass artery is supposed to supply blood flow complementarily to satisfy the demand of entire brain tissue. In the previous study, the cerebral flow in the patients with post bypass surgery was evaluated by time-resolved 3D phase contrast (4D Flow) MRI which could acquire entire blood flow data in one acquisition with wide coverage [1]. However, in the study, 4D Flow MRI was performed only at a single time point not over time. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of 4D Flow MRI to monitor the change of flow dynamics between before and after EC-IC bypass surgery.This study revealed that 4D Flow MRI could assess comprehensive flow information quantitatively, especially in the post-operative change of the contribution from each artery. In RAG bypass group, the ligation of the large artery (ipsilateral ICA) leads crucial change for flow dynamics. Not only the bypass artery but contralateral ICA and BA compensated the decreased BFV from sacrificed ICA (post/pre ratio; contralateral ICA 1.28±0.26, BA 1.24±0.23, respectively.). In STA bypass group, the complementary flow from STA-bypass had subtle impact on contralateral ICA or BA (post/pre ratio; contralateral ICA 1.06±0.25, BA 1.11±0.22, respectively).
The limitation of this study are as below. First, we only have small patient size which could impact on statistical power. Second, three weeks might be too early to assess post-operative change. Further longitudinal follow up by 4D Flow MRI is needed. Third, the collateral pathway of Willis ring (i.e. anterior and posterior communicating artery) was not assessed. They could affect the change of flow dynamics. Fourth, we didn’t focus on the clinical aspects, the prediction of bypass failure or recurrent stroke.