Yiming Xiao1,2, Dante De Nigris3, Ian J. Gerard4, Yuhan Ma4, Donatella Tampieri5, D. Louis Collins4, and Hassan Rivaz1,2
1PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3NeuroRx Research, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Montreal Neurological Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
Synopsis
Transcranial ultrasound
(TCUS) can be used to diagnose and monitor a range of neurological conditions,
such as Parkinson’s disease. However, reliable quantitative examination and multi-modal
image analysis that involves TCUS require TCUS-MRI registration to guide the interpretation
and measurement of the TCUS. We demonstrate that accurate rigid registration
can be achieved through aligning gradient orientations of the 3D TCUS and an associated
pseudo-TCUS constructed from the T1w MRI.
Purpose
Transcranial ultrasound (TCUS) is a special US technique that can image internal brain structures through acoustic windows of the human skull by operating at a low frequency (1∼5 MHz). With its advantages, such as low cost, high flexibility, and real-time imaging ability, TCUS has been popular for the diagnosis and monitoring of neurovascular conditions in the clinic. More recently, TCUS has shown promise to diagnose neurodegenerative conditions, such as Parkinson’s disease1 and Wilson’s disease2, by examining the abnormal image intensities in the image. However, the examination of TCUS images can be challenging because of lower image quality and difficult interpretation due to oblique imaging angles. To allow multi-modal image analysis and facilitate accurate assessment of the image features, TCUS and MR information must be aligned.Methods
Five healthy subjects (2
females, age=30±6 yo) were scanned with
a 3D MPRAGE T1w MRI protocol (TE=3.4ms, TR=2.3s, TI=0.9s, flip angle = 9 degrees,
resolution = 1x1x1 mm3) on a Siemens Tim Trio 3T MRI scanner. Series
of spatially tracked 2D B-mode TCUS scans were obtained from temporal bone
windows of each subject bilaterally. 3D TCUS volumes were reconstructed from
the 2D images for both left and right sides. To allow for subject movement, head
position was spatially tracked by an optical tracking system. An initial
alignment between TCUS and MRI volumes was obtained by a rigid transformation
through the alignment of corresponding facial landmarks of the
MRI and the patient in real space. Then, a gradient-orientation-based
registration technique3 was used to automatically register the 3D
TCUS and a pseudo-TCUS constructed from the MRI data. First, cerebrospinal
fluid (CSF) was segmented from each subject’s T1w MRI using a minimum distance
classifier, and then the pseudo-TCUS Ipseudo was created
through Ipseudo=1/(1+exp(0.2*D(Icsf))), where D(Icsf)
is the distance transformation of CSF segmentation Icsf. The
rigid transformation Treg was computed by
registering the 3D TCUS to the pseudo-TCUS. To validate the registration performance,
a ground truth transformation Tgt between 3D TCUS and
the initially registered MR image was generated through manual alignment based
on image feature correspondence by an expert. A 3D grid of regularly spaced (10 mm apart) landmarks P
were defined within the brain region of the initially registered MRI of each
subject, and the registration quality is evaluated as the root mean squared
error (RMSE) between the point sets P and Treg* (Tgt)-1*P
Results
The pseudo-TCUS is
demonstrated in Fig. 1A. TCUS volumes before and after registration that are
overlaid on the T1w MRI (with the same view as Fig. 1A) are shown in Fig.
1B&C. The alignment of brainstem, ventricles and brain edges are visibly
improved. Quantitatively, the RMSEs of the landmarks were evaluated at 1.89±0.14 mm and 1.86±0.47 mm, for the TUCS
obtained from the left and right side respectively, and the RMSE for both sides
was 1.88±0.32mm.
Discussion
Initial alignment of TCUS
and MRI through optical spatial tracking and facial landmark-based registration
may not result in satisfactory TCUS-MRI alignment as shown in Fig 1B. In this case, additional registration is
required to enable multi-modal image analysis. Although it is possible to achieve the
alignment by directly using the T1w MRI, we have found that this approach
failed in most of the cases by visual inspection. The pseudo-TCUS is created
based on the observation that most hyperintense signals appear in TCUS correspond
to the CSF. With the processed MRI, the registration performance is more robust
against the variation of the TCUS image quality across different subjects for
the chosen registration technique. TCUS can then be registered to any additional image modality through the T1w MRI indirectly. Conclusion
We have demonstrated
that accurate intra-subject registration between TCUS and MRI can be achieved
using an automatic gradient-orientation-based registration technique3 and
pseudo-TCUS. The method can facilitate multi-modal image analysis of
neurodegenerative diseases involving TCUS, opening new opportunities for efficient
diagnostic techniques. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Behnke S. et al. Differentiation of Parkinson’s disease and atypical parkinsonian
syndromes by transcranial ultrasound, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,
2005.
2. Svetel M. et al. Transcranial sonography in Wilson’s
disease, Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 2012.
3. De Nigris D. et al., Fast
rigid registration of pre-operative magnetic resonance images to
intra-operative ultrasound for neurosurgery based on high confidence gradient
orientations, IJCARS, 2013.