Zhizheng Zhuo1,2, Zhuqing Long1, Bin Jing1, Xiangyu Ma1, Han Liu1, Jianxin Dong1, Xiao Mo1, Qi Yan1, and Haiyun Li1
1Bio-medical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China, 2Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Beijing, People's Republic of China
Synopsis
MCI (Mild Cognitive
Impairment) is a pre-stage of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). And the early detection
of MCI is important for early treatment of AD patients. In this work,
prediction efficiency of early stage of AD based on the functional connectivity
network characteristics was evaluated by using a couple of classifiers with
AAL_90 and AAL_1024 templates. The results showed that brain functional
characteristics were effective in the prediction of MCI with a SVM-based
classifier. And a more fine template could improve prediction accuracy.
Purpose
MCI (Mild Cognitive Impairment) is a pre-stage
of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). And the early detection of MCI is important for
early treatment of AD patients. MR techniques such as structural MRI and
functional MRI (fMRI) have been proved to be available for the differentiation of
AD, MCI and normal situation1. In this work, prediction efficiency of
early stage of AD based on the functional connectivity network characteristics was
evaluated by using a couple of classifiers with AAL_90 and AAL_1024 templates.Methods
Bold-based
fMRI and 3D T1w structural MRI images of 32 MCI patients and 35 normal controls
were obtained from the ADNI (website: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/ ). All
these subjects are age and sex matched. Pre-processing procedures including
slice timing, head motion correction and nuisance covariates regression
(realign parameter, white matter and CSF signals), filtering (0.01-0.1Hz),
normalization by using 3D T1w structure MRI images and DARTEL, smooth by DARTEL
were carried out based on DPARSFA software. And then the time series within
each region based on AAL_90 and AAL_1024 templates were extracted and the
corresponding connectivity matrix were calculated. All the matrices were
threshold by a PSW method (PSW=0.25) and converted into binary matrices for
network parameters calculation.
For
both AAL_90 and AAL_1024 template-based methods, the network parameters (shown
in table 1) including 5 global and 9 local parameters were extracted from the
binary connectivity matrix for each subject2. And there are totally
thousands of features for each subject. So before the classification, a fisher-score
method was performed for features reduction and finally the first leading 30
features with high fisher-scores were selected for the next classification. Classifies
including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Naïve
Bayes, Linear Discriminate Analysis (LDA) and Random forest were evaluated and
compared. Results
The extracted functional connectivity network
parameters were shown in Table 1 and the classification results were summarized
and compared in Table 2. Discussion
Different
template-based methods showed different classification efficiencies for a
specific classifier. The AAL_1024 template-based technique will build a more
fine connectivity network and extract more features to character the brain
functional topological structure than the AAL_90 template-based one and so the
classification by AAL_1024 template method is better. Different classifiers
also showed different classification efficiencies for a specific ALL
template-based technique. For AAL_1024 template-based method, SVM showed the
best classification efficiency with a high accuracy (95.52%), precision (96.77%
and 94.44% for MCI and NC) and recall (93.75% and 97.14% for MCI and NC), which
indicate that the SVM was a proper classifier for predicting MCI from NC. It
may assist the doctors to early diagnose the MCI patients in addition to
clinical evaluation. Conclusion
Brain functional characteristics were effective
in the prediction of MCI with a SVM-based classifier. And a more fine template
could improve prediction accuracy. For both doctors and patients, this will be very
important for the early detection of MCI and corresponding treatment strategy. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Yu S, Qinhua Y, Rong F, et al. Disrupted functional brain connectivity and its
association to structural connectivity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment
and Alzheimer's disease. Plos one, 2014; 9(5). Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096505.
2.
Mikail R, Olaf S. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations.
NeuroImage, 2010; 52: 1059-1069.