Roy Haast1, Dimo Ivanov1, Jacobus F.A. Jansen2, Hubert Smeets3, Irenaeus de Coo4, Elia Formisano1, and Kâmil Uludağ1
1Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands, 2Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands, 3Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands, 4Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Synopsis
The m.3242A>G mitochondrial mutation is known
to cause the MELAS syndrome. A group of MELAS patients was scanned using
multi-parameter quantitative 7T MRI to assess brain changes related to mutation
load and disease duration. Here, we focused on cortical thickness differences
between control subjects and MELAS patients and within patients as a function
of mutation load. MELAS patients were characterized by a reduced cortical
thickness compared to control subjects in several regions. Within these regions,
cortical thickness decreases with increasing mutation load for the fusiform and
planum temporal gyri, which are involved in visual working memory and auditory
processing, respectively.
Purpose
The m.3242A>G mitochondrial mutation is known
to cause the mitochondrial encephalopathy lactate acidosis and stroke-like
episodes (MELAS) syndrome1. However, the number of mitochondria
within a single cell that harbors this mutation (e.g. mutation load) differs
between patients, but also between tissue types within a single patient. Mutation
load in muscle or urine is reported to correspond best with the severity of the
phenotype. In general, carriers of the mutation show a wide range of symptoms,
where hearing impairment and exercise and glucose intolerance are most frequently
observed. A subset of MELAS patients also shows neurological involvement and
cognitive impairment2. In the current study, a group of MELAS
patients was scanned using multi-parameter quantitative 7T MRI to characterize
possible brain changes underlying these neurological and cognitive changes and to
test whether these are related to mutation load in urine epithelial cells (UECs).
Here, we show the first results by focusing on cortical thickness differences between
control subjects and MELAS patients and within patients as a function of
mutation load.Methods
Subjects and MRI: Eighteen MELAS and twelve age- and gender-matched control subjects were
included in this study. MP2RAGE and B1+ maps were
acquired using a whole-body 7T scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen,
Germany) using a 32-channel phased-array coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, USA).
MP2RAGE datasets were acquired with a 0.7 mm isotropic resolution using the
following parameters: TR/TE/TI1/TI2 = 5000/2.47/900/2750 ms, α1/α2 = 5°/3°, GRAPPA
3 for MP2RAGE and TR/TE = 2400/0.78 ms, TD1/TD2 = 580/1800 ms, α1/α2 = 4°/11°
and GRAPPA 2 for SA2RAGE. Dielectric pads were placed proximal to the temporal
lobes to locally increase the transmit B1+ field and to
improve its homogeneity across the brain3. For each subject, the
mutation load was determined in UECs following the procedures as described in
Sallevelt et al. (2013)4. Analysis: First, MP2RAGE and B1+
maps were processed as described in Haast et al. (2016)5. FreeSurfer
analysis was performed using the B1+ corrected MP2RAGE
volume as input, followed by coregistration to ‘fsaverage’ using mri_surf2surf
to compare the cortical thickness surface maps. Between-groups effects on
cortical thickness were assessed for each region (based on the FreeSurfer
Destrieux atlas) using multivariate ANOVA by controlling for age, gender and
educational level. The effect of mutation load on cortical thickness within the MELAS group was then
assessed using Pearson correlation analysis for each region where a significant
group effect was observed.Results
Example MP2RAGE data from a control (42 yrs. old) and
two MELAS patients (45 and 24 yrs., resp.) are displayed in Fig. 1, for
illustration. Fig. 2 illustrates the (number- and color-coded) regions that
were characterized by significantly reduced cortical thickness for the MELAS
patients (grey bars; N=18, mean age = 35.58 ± 10.78 yrs. and 13 females)
compared to the controls (black bars; N=12, 39.94 ± 9.38 yrs. and 9 females),
after correction for possible differences in age, gender and educational level
(p-values are indicated by asterisks). Significant correlations between
mutation load and cortical thickness (within the MELAS group) were observed for
the planum temporal (p=0.017, r=-0.55) and fusiform gyri (p=0.044, r=-0.48), see Fig. 3. In
general, cortical thickness seems to decrease with increasing mutation load. Results
This is the largest neuroimaging study focusing
on possible brain changes in patients that carry the m.3243A>G mutation.
Several regions were characterized by a reduced cortical thickness for the
MELAS patients compared to the controls. These include regions associated with
the cingulate cortex, insula, frontal lobe and visual cortex. In addition, the
strongest correlations between mutation load and cortical thickness within the
MELAS group were detected for the for the fusiform and planum temporal gyri,
structures involved in for example visual working memory and auditory
processing, respectively6,7. The latter seems to correspond with the
high prevalence (48%) of auditory impairment in MELAS patients2.
More thorough examination is currently on-going using all the acquired MR
modalities and patient characteristics (including cognitive functioning) to extensively
map the brain changes in m.3243A>G carriers.Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to Prof. Dr. Andrew Webb (Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands) and Dr. José Marques (Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, Netherlands) for providing the dielectric pads and the MATLAB code to perform the post-hoc T1 correction used in this study, respectively.References
[1] Goto et al. Nature. 1990
Dec 13;348(6302). [2] de Laat et al. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012 Nov;35(6). [3]
Teeuwisse et al. Magn Reson Med. 2012 Apr;67(4). [4] Sallevelt et al. J Med Genet. 2013 Feb;50(2). [5] Haast et al. Front
Neuroanat. 2016 (in press). [6] Han et al. Neuroimage. 2013 Jun;73. [7] Deouell
et al. Neuron. 2007 Sep 20;55(6).