Morteza Esmaeili1, Anne Line Stensjøen1, Erik Magnus Berntsen1, Ole Solheim1,2,3, and Ingerid Reinertsen3,4
1Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, 2Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olav’s University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway, 3Norwegian National Advisory unit for Ultrasound and Image Guided Therapy, St. Olav’s University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway, 4Department of Medical Technology, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway
Synopsis
In this study we assess the growth
pattern of one of the most aggressive brain tumor in adults. Surgery is a
standard of care for these patients, and understanding the prominent growth
direction of tumor lesions can eventually benefit surgical planning.
Contrast-enhanced MR data at two time-points of diagnosis and pre-operation
were analyzed to derive mean 3D vector field demonstrating the growth
directions. A DTI white matter (WM) atlas was used to investigate the degree of
agreement and alignment of the generated vector field towards white matter
fibers.
INTRODUCTION
Derived from glial cells, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an extremely
aggressive malignant tumor in adults. Generating MR-derived growth pattern models for GBM
have been of an attractive approach in neuro-oncology, suggesting a distinct pattern of lesion spread with tendency in growing along the white fiber direction
for the invasive component (1,2). Here we report preliminary
results from a retrospective analysis, designed to provide a brain atlas
predicting the dominant directions of tumor lesion expansion/shrinkage prior to
surgery.METHODS
Forty three adult glioblastoma patients were
examined at two time-points; diagnostic and pre-operation, with minimum 14 days
between acquisitions with contrast-enhanced anatomical MRI (ce-T1). The study was approved by
the regional ethics committee and adhered to the Helsinki Declaration. The tumor volumes
were delineated by two radiology experts. The image analysis software BrainVoyager QX (Version 2.3,
Brain Innovation B.V., Maastricht, The Netherlands)
was used for semi-automatic tumor segmentation. The
widely accepted Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) script packages (3) and customized MATLAB scripts were used for
registration of MR images. The 3D data analysis pipeline (Fig. 1) was started
with a few pre-processing steps including up-sampling for identical voxel
number/size, N4 bias field correction (from ANTs package) and skull stripping
using Brain Extraction Tool (BET) (4). Using segmented tumor masks, fine non-linear
registration was performed to generate deformation fields of tumor lesions
delineated from T1-diagnostic and T1-pre-operation images. Using non-linear transformation, all solutions were transformed
into the MNI template space and compared with a DTI WM atlas (5). Angles between the vector fields of DTI WM and tumor growth
directions were calculated (within sub-regions with prominent lesion overlaps)
to estimate an angle map of lesion growth to that of white matter tracts.
RESULTS
To compute the degree of alignment between
tumor growth vector fields and white matter tracts, an angle map was calculated.
The results of the generated maps were color-coded to visualize the alignment
agreements between two dataset, as yellow color indicates the maximum alignment
(θ<20º or θ>160º, Fig. 1). In all sub-regions, tumor displacement showed a
reproducible tendency in moving along the white matter tracts (Fig. 1), as evidenced
by voxel-wise parallel alignments of the mean vector fields towards the tensor field
of the WM atlas. CONCLUSION
The resulting GBM
atlas of deformation vector field provides information on tumor growth pattern
prior to surgery. We mapped the delineated growth pattern on DTI WM atlas, investigating
the hypothesis that tumor cells tend to track along the white matter. Our
findings represent a first step in investigating the hypothesis that tumor
cells tend to track along the white matter.Acknowledgements
References
1. Stensjoen AL, Solheim O, Kvistad KA,
Haberg AK, Salvesen O, Berntsen EM. Growth dynamics of untreated glioblastomas in vivo. Neuro Oncol
2015;17(10):1402-1411.
2. Bondiau
PY, Clatz O, Sermesant M, Marcy PY, Delingette H, Frenay M, Ayache N.
Biocomputing: numerical simulation of glioblastoma growth using diffusion tensor
imaging. Phys Med Biol 2008;53(4):879-893.
3. Tustison
NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich PA, Gee JC. N4ITK: improved
N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29(6):1310-1320.
4. Muschelli
J, Ullman NL, Mould WA, Vespa P, Hanley DF, Crainiceanu CM. Validated automatic
brain extraction of head CT images. Neuroimage 2015;114:379-385.
5. Zhang
H, Awate SP, Das SR, Woo JH, Melhem ER, Gee JC, Yushkevich PA. A tract-specific
framework for white matter morphometry combining macroscopic and microscopic
tract features. Med Image Anal 2010;14(5):666-673.