Yan Li1, Stojan Maleschlijski1, and Sarah J Nelson1
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
The
study evaluated the reproducibility of metabolite profiles within the normal
appearing white matter that were acquired using automatic prescription of short
echo time magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging for ten patients with high grade
glioma.
PURPOSE
The
purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of brain metabolites
obtained from 3D short echo time (TE) magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging
(MRSI) at 3T within a clinically feasible acquisition time. The 3D MRSI dataset
were acquired using automatic prescription of both the volume of interest and
outer volume suppression bands to facilitate the acquisition process [1-3]. The
test-retest agreement of the MRSI parameters was evaluated in patients with high-grade
glioma. This is especially important for providing reliable results for use in clinical
management. METHODS
Ten
patients (4F/6M; age = 52±15 y/o) were studied using a 3T MR
scanner. Two patients were newly diagnosed as grade 3 astrocytoma and 8 patients
had newly diagnosed glioblastoma. All patients had a second imaging session
within a median (range) of 60 (29-80) days. During the MR studies, three patients received concurrent radiochemotherapy, and the others had tomozolomide only. Both MR examinations
included pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo, T2-weighted
fluid attenuated inversion recovery, and 3D short TE MRSI data. The MRSI data
were obtained using CHESS water suppression, VSS outer volume suppression and PRESS
volume selection with an overPRESS factor of 1.5, TE/TR=35/1300ms, spectral
array=18x22x16 and spatial resolution=1cm3. The PRESS volume and VSS
suppression bands were automatically placed either by a method that calculates
the masks of brain and lipid in real time [1] or predefining templates in the
MNI152 standard space [3]. Flyback trajectories were applied in the S/I
dimension to speed up the total acquisition time. The total acquisition time
was about 8.5 minutes for 3D short TE MRSI. The 3D spectral data were combined
and processed as described previously [4,5], and then quantified by LCModel [6]
using a simulated basis-set. Metabolite levels were expressed relative to the creatine
(Cr) peak. For MR data acquired at the 2nd visit, T1-weighted pre-contrast
images were affinely registered to the images from the first visit for each
subject and the corresponding transformation matrix was applied to the center
of the excitation volume. The T2 hyperintense lesion (T2L) and normal-appearing
white matter (NAWM) were segmented automatically and then down-sampled to the
resolution of MRSI. The coefficients of variance (CVs) for reproducibility were
calculated on a voxel-by-voxel basis for each metabolite between the two
sessions. RESULTS
During
the MR studies, no patients had confirmed tumor progression. The volume of the
T2L for each MR session is shown in Table 1. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show
examples of MRI and MRSI data from two patients. Although there were significant
changes in the T2L for patient #1, the alignment for the images and
spectroscopy worked well. The masks of NAWM are illustrated in the Figure 2. Considering
that there were changes in the T2L for these patients, only the voxels
overlapping by at least 75% for NAWM for both sessions were evaluated in the
study. The CV for Cho/Cr, NAA/Cr, Glu/Cr and mI/Cr in the NAWM were 12.6±3.7%, 12.7±5.1%, 27.8±4.7%, and 19.2±4.7%,
respectively, and the relative concentration ratios to Cr were 0.37±0.09, 1.56±0.34,
1.25±0.40, and 0.94±0.29, respectively. DISCUSSION
This
study evaluated the reproducibility of metabolite profiles obtained using
automatic prescription of short TE MRSI for patients with high grade glioma. The accuracy and reproducibility of the automatic
placement of the excitation volume using the atlas-based templates has previously
been evaluated in healthy volunteer and showed great consistence for intra- and
inter-subject analysis [3]. Registration of the position of the PRESS
localization volume between two scans worked well for patients with glioma. The
spectra were quantified using LCModel and only voxels within the NAWM and
satisfying CRLB criteria (CRLB<20) were included in the analysis. The average
CVs for the major metabolites within the NAWM between sessions were similar to those
observed in published data [7], but were relatively larger for Glu/Cr and mI/Cr,
which could be due to treatment received for patients or variations in the
different brain regions/tissues. Further studies will perform more detailed segmentation
and analysis in a larger population.
CONCLUSION
This
study demonstrated the feasibility of using a fast acquisition process,
reliable post-processing methods and established reproducibility, which are key
factors for the application of MRSI in the clinical setting. Acknowledgements
This
research was supported by NIH R01CA127612 and German Research Foundation
research fellowship MA 7292/1-1.References
[1]
Ozhinsky E, Vigneron DB, Chang SM and Nelson SJ. Automated prescription of
oblique brain 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med.
2013; 69:920-30.
[2]
Ozhinsky E., Vigneron DB and Nelson SJ. Improved spatial coverage for brain 3D
PRESS MRSI by automatic placement of outer-volume suppression saturation bands.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33:792-802.
[3]
Bian W, Li Y, Crane JC and Nelson SJ. Towards Robust Reproducibility Study for
MRSI via Fully automated reproducible imaging positioning. ISMRM 2015.
[4]
Nelson SJ. Analysis of volume MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging data for the
evaluation of
patients
with brain tumors. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:228–239.
[5]
Li Y, Osorio JA, Ozturk-Isik E, et al. Considerations in applying 3D PRESS H-1
brain MRSI with
an
eight-channel phased-array coil at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:1295 –
1302.
[6]
Provencher SW. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo
proton NMR
spectra.
Magn Reson Med 1993;30: 672–679.
[7]
Veenith T, Mada M, Carter E, et al. Comparison of Inter Subject Variability and
Reproducibility of Whole Brain Proton Spectroscopy. Plos One 2014; 9.