Single breath washout (SBW) is an emerging pulmonary function test due to its relative simplicity and speed. Most significant outcome parameter, phase III ‘alveolar’ slope (tracer gas decay during mid-exhalation) is sensitive to ventilation heterogeneity. In this work, a method is presented for SBW-imaging with two tracer gases with inherently different physical properties: hyperpolarized 129Xe and 3He. Findings in our study are in agreement with trends seen in SBW from pulmonary function lab: the heavier, less diffusive gas (129Xe) has a steeper phase III slope. This indicates increased regional ventilation heterogeneity due to a lesser degree of diffusional mixing.
4 healthy volunteers (26-35 years, FEV1 z-score>-1.63) underwent SBW-imaging using time-resolved spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) sequences on a 1.5T scanner. Flexible transmit-receive quadrature RF coils tuned to the respective frequencies (48.62MHz for 3He and 17.65MHz for 129Xe) were used in experiments. Sequence parameters for 2D time-resolved SPGR sequences were: 64x64 matrix; single slice with thickness = 300mm; FOV= 45cm; phase FOV = 0.81. A total of 60 images were acquired with no delay between acquisitions. For 3He, the following parameters were used: TR/TE = 2.7/0.8ms, receiver bandwidth=62.5kHz, flip angle = 1°, resulting in a temporal resolution of 0.14s. For 129Xe, parameters were as follows: TR/TE = 5/1.3ms, receiver bandwidth=32kHz and a flip angle = 1°, resulting in a temporal resolution of 0.26s. A gas mixture containing 150ml 3He (~25% polarization, DHe-air~0.88cm2/s) or 500-700ml enriched-129Xe (~25% polarization,DXe-air~0.11cm2/s), each topped up to 1l with N2, was used. Subjects were instructed to exhale to functional residual capacity before inhaling the gas mixture, as per the conventional SBW lung function test. The gas mixture in the lungs was then exhaled after image acquisition was initiated. Subjects aimed to achieve a constant flow of 400ml/s, whilst breathing through a restricted flow meter (RS 100 Pneumotachograph, Hans Rudolph, Shawnee, KS, USA). Figure 2A shows typical results from SBW-imaging acquisitions. Flow recordings were aligned with MR images using the MR signal from a ROI placed in the trachea. Regional signal decay was corrected for RF depolarization using flip angle maps(Figure 2B). 3D proton MRI was performed and segmented to calculate the regional lung volume ($$$V_{^{1}H}(r)$$$). MR images were registered and normalized for signal intensity using a method similar to Tzeng4:
$$S_{n}(r,t) = \frac{S(r,t)\cdot\frac{V_{tracer}}{\sum_r S(r,1)}}{V_{^{1}H}(r)}$$
Where $$$S(r,t)$$$ is the measured image intensity at position $$$r(x,y)$$$ and t is the time at the discrete points of measurement. $$$V_{tracer}$$$ is the total inhaled volume of 3He or 129Xe gas. The ratio of $$$V_{tracer}/\sum_r S(r,1)$$$ is calculated from the first image (as gas in lungs=the amount inhaled). $$$V_{^{1}H}(r)$$$ is the regional lung volume derived from the segmented 3D 1H-MR images (Figure 2C). Regional maps of SBW slope (corresponding to the phase III ‘alveolar’ slope measured in SBW at the mouth) were calculated pixel-by-pixel as the normalized signal decay ($$$S_{n}(r,t)$$$ per unit exhaled gas volume [%/liter], following the convention of the SBW test. Finally, to enable comparison of SBW slope maps, values were normalized by the regional initial signal.
1. Robinson PD, Latzin P, Verbanck S, et al. Consensus statement for inert gas washout measurement using multiple- and single- breath tests. Eur Respir J. 2013;41(3):507-522.
2. Horn F, Rao M, Stewart NJ, Wild JM. Multiple breath washout of hyperpolarized 129Xe and 3He in human lungs with three dimensional balanced steady-state free-precession imaging. MRM. 2016; DOI.: 10.1002/mrm.26319.
3. Singer F, Stern G, Thamrin C, Fuchs O et al. Tidal volume single breath washout of two tracer gases- a practical and promising lung function test. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17588.
4. Tzeng YS, Lutchen K, Albert M. The difference in ventilation heterogeneity between asthmatic and healthy subjects quantified using hyperpolarized 3He MRI. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(3):813-822.