Yoshisuke Kadoya1, Tosiaki Miyati2, Naoki Ohno2, Satoshi Kobayashi2, and Toshifumi Gabata1
1Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan, 2Division of Health Sciences, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
Synopsis
Portal venous flow
(PVF) seems to be affected by gravity, ie., it depends on the body posture. We
validated the effect of gravity on PVF in supine and upright positions using an
original multi-posture MRI. We compared maximum PVF, PVF velocity, PVF
volume, and cross-sectional area of portal vein between supine and upright
positions. The mean PVF velocity, PVF volume, maximum PVF, and cross-sectional
area in the upright position were significantly lower than those in the supine
position. Gravity reduces PVF velocity and volume, and these differences
between postures potentially provide new diagnostic information.
Purpose
Portal venous flow (PVF) is clinically important in liver function.1, 2 PVF may
be affected by gravity, ie., it depends on body posture, but this has
yet to be confirmed. In this study, we evaluated the effect of gravity on PVF in people in the
supine and upright positions using an original magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
system that can obtain images in any posture (multi-posture MRI).Materials and Methods
Caval
velocity-mapped images in eight healthy volunteers were obtained with ECG-triggered
cine phase-contrast technique in the supine and upright positions using
multi-posture MRI (Fig. 1). The mean PVF velocity in the
region of interest in each cardiac phase was determined after correction by subtraction
of the baseline offset due to eddy currents. In addition, a PVF curve in the cardiac
cycle was obtained from the PVF-velocity multiplied by the cross-sectional
area, and the PVF volume was calculated by integration of the PVF curve in the
cardiac cycle. The maximum PVF (PVFmax), PVF velocity, PVF volume, and
cross-sectional area of the portal vein in the supine and upright positions
were assessed.Results and Discussion
The
mean PVF velocity in the upright position (1.96 ± 1.29 cm/sec) was
significantly lower than that in the supine position (10.1 ± 3.06 cm/sec) (P < .05) (Fig. 2a). The mean PVF volume in the upright position (87.2
± 46.2 mL/min) was significantly lower than that in the supine position (854 ±
374 mL/min) (P < .05) (Fig. 2b). The
PVFmax in the upright position (16.5 ±
5.30 mL/min) was significantly lower than that in the supine position (92.2 ± 34.9 mL/min) (P < .05) (Fig. 2c). These results indicate that gravity reduced the
PVF velocity and volume, and these differences between postures potentially
provide new diagnostic information on the compensatory faculty of gravity as
compared with standard PVF measurements. In addition, the mean cross-sectional
area in the upright position (90.1 ± 37.4 mm2) was significantly
lower than that in the supine position (125 ± 30.1 mm2) (P < .05) because of the regulation of
the portal pressure (Fig. 2d).Conclusion
Gravity
reduces PVF velocity and volume. Multi-posture MRI makes it possible to
evaluate the effect of gravity on PVF.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Brauer, R.W.
Liver circulation and function. 111, 57. Physiol. Rev. 1962: 43: 115-213
2. Itai Y, Matsui 0 :Blood flow and liver imaging. Radiology 1997: 202: 306-314