2026

Evaluation of gravity effect on portal venous flow using multi-posture MRI
Yoshisuke Kadoya1, Tosiaki Miyati2, Naoki Ohno2, Satoshi Kobayashi2, and Toshifumi Gabata1

1Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan, 2Division of Health Sciences, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan

Synopsis

Portal venous flow (PVF) seems to be affected by gravity, ie., it depends on the body posture. We validated the effect of gravity on PVF in supine and upright positions using an original multi-posture MRI. We compared maximum PVF, PVF velocity, PVF volume, and cross-sectional area of portal vein between supine and upright positions. The mean PVF velocity, PVF volume, maximum PVF, and cross-sectional area in the upright position were significantly lower than those in the supine position. Gravity reduces PVF velocity and volume, and these differences between postures potentially provide new diagnostic information.

Purpose

Portal venous flow (PVF) is clinically important in liver function.1, 2 PVF may be affected by gravity, ie., it depends on body posture, but this has yet to be confirmed. In this study, we evaluated the effect of gravity on PVF in people in the supine and upright positions using an original magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system that can obtain images in any posture (multi-posture MRI).

Materials and Methods

Caval velocity-mapped images in eight healthy volunteers were obtained with ECG-triggered cine phase-contrast technique in the supine and upright positions using multi-posture MRI (Fig. 1). The mean PVF velocity in the region of interest in each cardiac phase was determined after correction by subtraction of the baseline offset due to eddy currents. In addition, a PVF curve in the cardiac cycle was obtained from the PVF-velocity multiplied by the cross-sectional area, and the PVF volume was calculated by integration of the PVF curve in the cardiac cycle. The maximum PVF (PVFmax), PVF velocity, PVF volume, and cross-sectional area of the portal vein in the supine and upright positions were assessed.

Results and Discussion

The mean PVF velocity in the upright position (1.96 ± 1.29 cm/sec) was significantly lower than that in the supine position (10.1 ± 3.06 cm/sec) (P < .05) (Fig. 2a). The mean PVF volume in the upright position (87.2 ± 46.2 mL/min) was significantly lower than that in the supine position (854 ± 374 mL/min) (P < .05) (Fig. 2b). The PVFmax in the upright position (16.5 ± 5.30 mL/min) was significantly lower than that in the supine position (92.2 ± 34.9 mL/min) (P < .05) (Fig. 2c). These results indicate that gravity reduced the PVF velocity and volume, and these differences between postures potentially provide new diagnostic information on the compensatory faculty of gravity as compared with standard PVF measurements. In addition, the mean cross-sectional area in the upright position (90.1 ± 37.4 mm2) was significantly lower than that in the supine position (125 ± 30.1 mm2) (P < .05) because of the regulation of the portal pressure (Fig. 2d).

Conclusion

Gravity reduces PVF velocity and volume. Multi-posture MRI makes it possible to evaluate the effect of gravity on PVF.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Brauer, R.W. Liver circulation and function. 111, 57. Physiol. Rev. 1962: 43: 115-213

2. Itai Y, Matsui 0 :Blood flow and liver imaging. Radiology 1997: 202: 306-314

Figures

Fig. 1 Caval velocity-mapped images were obtained with ECG-triggered cine phase-contrast technique in a) the supine position and b) upright position using multi-posture MRI.

Fig. 2 a) The mean PVF velocity in the upright position was significantly lower than that in the supine position (P<.05). b) The mean PVF volume in the upright position was significantly lower than that in the supine position (P<.05). c ) The mean PVFmax in the upright position was significantly lower than that in the supine position (P<.05). d ) The mean cross-sectional area in the upright position was significantly lower than that in the supine position (P<.05).

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017)
2026