Arthur Peter Wunderlich1,2, Holger Cario3, Isabelle Tomczak1, Meinrad Beer1, and Stefan Andreas Schmidt1
1Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University, Medical Center, Ulm, Germany, 2Section for Experimental Radiology, Ulm University, Medical Center, Ulm, Germany, 3Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Ulm University, Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
Synopsis
Tissue
signal intensity ratio (SIR) has been used for a long time to determine liver
iron concentration (LIC) based on gradient echo MRI. We studied the influence
of acquisition parameters FA, RF spoiling and saturation regions, as well as image
quality score, on the correlation of natural logarithm of SIR values to
reference LIC obtained with spin echo. In our cohort of 85 patients, no
significant influence on the slope of linear regression line was found, neither
of acquisition protocol settings nor image quality, whereas the intercept was
dependent on parameters influencing T1 sensitivity, namely FA and RF
spoiling.
Purpose
This
work was performed to test the influence of acquisition parameters on a) image quality of gradient echo (GRE) acquisitions and b) the
correlation between liver-to-reference signal intensity ratio (SIR) values
obtained with GRE and reference liver iron concentration (LIC) based on spin
echo (SE). Correlation
was then c) also tested for influence of image quality.
Background
It
has been shown previously that there is a linear correlation between natural
logarithm of SIR values (ln SIR) and LIC (1). In brief, slope of ln (SIR) vs.
LIC is associated to R
2* differences of tissues, whereas intercept
of this relation is the logarithm of scaling factor (S
0) ratio, which depends on
tissue T
1 and MR acquisition parameters.
Methods
85 patients
(38 f, 47 m, age range 2.3 – 73 years, mean 24 ± 15.7 y) suspected for liver
iron overload were scanned at 1.5 T (Siemens Avanto, Siemens Healthineers,
Iselin, NJ) with two MRI protocols: a) the Ferriscan® protocol involving five
SE sequences in free breathing, each of 3:15 min duration, and b) three
transversal slices acquired using multi-echo GRE at TE/TR 4.7-9.5-14.2-19/120
ms, FA of 20° and 90°, both with and without RF spoiling (FLASH/T1-FFE/SPGR vs.
FISP/FFE/GRASS), requiring a total of four breathholds. A saline bag was
positioned on the left side adjacent to the patient body. In 31 investigations,
saturation regions (SATs) were applied cranial and caudal of the transversal
slices in order to destroy signal from mobile protons causing pulsation
artefacts.
Image quality was scored on a five-point scale
(no/minor/moderate/severe artifacts, non-diagnostic). Three regions were
manually placed in the liver, one each in left and right paraspinal muscle, and
one in the saline bag. ROI median value was employed to calculate natural
logarithm of liver-to-muscle and liver-to-saline SIR. Both were correlated to
reference LIC obtained by Ferriscan®. Linear regression analysis of ln (SIR)
vs. reference LIC was performed separately for different FA, RF spoiling
condition, +/- SATs, and image quality score ranges, yielding values for slope
and intercept of linear regression lines and their uncertainties, as well as
coefficient of determination R2. Results of regression were compared
between acquisition parameters and image quality scores. Differences, where
present, were checked for significance.Results
With RF
spoiling, image quality was scored 1 or 2 (no or minor artefacts) in 23/31
(74%) investigations performed with SATs and 25/54 (46%) scans without SATs.
Overall, 48/85 (56%) examinations were scored 1 or 2. Without RF spoiling, only
19/31 (61%) cases with SATs, and 22/54 (41%) without SATs, overall 41/85 (48%) were
scored 1 or 2. No case was scored non-diagnostic, neither with nor without RF
spoiling. For mean and SD of scores for different conditions cf. Tab. 1.
Slopes of
ln (SIR) vs. reference LIC were equal between conditions, whereas intercept
varied between acquisitions with and without RF spoiler at FA 90°. At FA 20°,
there was no significant difference between RF spoiling conditions. When using
saline reference, differences concerning RF spoiling at FA 90° were more
pronounced than using paraspinal muscles as reference. Some examples of
correlations between ln (SIR) and reference LIC are depicted in Fig. 1 for
liver-to-NaCl SIR and in Fig. 2 for liver-to-muscle SIR.
Correlations between reference LIC and ln (SIR)
were good, with an R2 between 0.85 and 0.9 with saline reference,
and 0.88 < R2 < 0.93 with paraspinal muscles as reference. Within
their uncertainty, correlation parameters slope and intercept, as well as R2,
were independent of image quality score, +/- SATs, and +/- RF spoiling.
Uncertainty of correlation parameters was lower with muscle reference than
saline.Discussion
Correlation
of signal intensity ratios determined from GRE MRI to reference LIC values
determined with SE turned out to be independent of GRE scan parameters. Although
saturation regions and RF spoiling have a positive impact on image quality, it
was shown that they do not influence correlation between
ln (SIR) and reference LIC. Coefficients of determination
and precision of correlation parameters benefit from using paraspinal muscles
as signal reference compared to a saline bag.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Wunderlich
AP, Cario H, Bommer M, Beer M, Schmidt SA, Juchems MS. MRI-Based
Liver Iron Content Determination at 3T in Regularly Transfused Patients by
Signal Intensity Ratio Using an Alternative Analysis Approach Based on R2*
Theory. RoFo 2016. PubMed PMID: 27299667.