Tsung-Yuan Li1,2, Ni-Jung Chang1, Clayton Chi-Chang Chen1,3, and Jyh-Wen Chai1,3,4
1Department of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Taichung, Taiwan, 2Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Taichung, Taiwan, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, HungKuang University, Taichung, Taiwan, Taichung, Taiwan, 4College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Taichung, Taiwan
Synopsis
The differences of indices in diffusion tensor
images (DTI) of patients with dementia are well-discussed in recent years.
However, the comorbidity of dementia and depression was observed. In this study,
we focused on the white matter changes associated with depressive symptoms in dementia
and the relationship between DTI indices and cognitive functions in depressed
and non-depressed patients. By an ROI-based analysis of the indices and TBSS
analysis in DTI, we investigated the differences between patients of dementia
with depression and without depression. Furthermore, we correlate the
differences with the score of some clinical cognitive test to figure out the
subtle differences.
Introduction
Recent
studies suggested that the change of indices in diffusion tensor images (DTI) is
common in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (1, 2). Recently, a high prevalence of the comorbidity of dementia and depression was reported in
the literatures. However, little is known about how these two different types
of disease interfere with each other. This study aims to investigate white
matter changes in patient of Alzheimer's disease without depressive symptoms
(AD, Control) and those with depression (DAD, Case) using diffusion tensor
imaging (DTI), as well as analyzed the clinical cognitive tests.Methods
This study included 26 patients with depression under Alzheimer’s
disease and 20 sex and age-matched subjects with Alzheimer’s disease only. All
participants completed the neuropsychological tests: Montreal Cognitive
Assessment ( MoCA ) and Commission on Dietetic Registration ( CDR ). DTI data
were acquired on a 1.5T Siemens MR system with following parameters: TR/TE=10000/107ms,
b-value=1000 s/mm2, 30 directions, NEX=3 and voxel size=2*2*2mm3. Whole brain tracts of the FA
and MD were carried out using FMRIB Software Library v5.0 (FSL) (4), Statistical
Parametric Mapping (SPM) (5)and Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS)(6). White
matter ROIs were created from Susumu Mori (7). The statistical analysis of the
DTI indices of 68 ROIs were performed using a parametric permutation test and P<0.05
for significance. Subsequently, partial Pearson correlation analyses were
performed to correlate the clinical evaluations with the regional DTI values
within patient groups. TBSS pipeline was followed to show whole brain tract
differences of both FA and MD in these two groups and P<0.05 for
significance.Results
Demographic of case and control groups was showed in Table
1. In this study, the results showed that the FA of control group in some
specified regions of interest (ROI) in white matter areas was significantly
lower than case group. The values of MD showed higher in the control group than
the case group (independent t- test, P<0.05). Table 2 and Table 3 showed the
detail ROI areas with significantly different DTI indexes in two study groups.
Figure 1 showed the areas with significantly different in FA and MD. The negative
correlation showed between FA in left anterior corona radiata and the naming test in MoCA. The positive
correlation observed between the naming test in MoCA and MD in left retrolenticular
part of internal capsule, left anterior corona radiate and left superior corona
radiate. (Table 4) Table 5 showed the tracts differences in these two groups.Conclusions
There were significant differences of white matter DTI
indexes between both groups. The results are matched both in the ROI- based
analysis and TBSS. Correlations between those white matter abnormalities and MoCA
(Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and CDR (Commission on Dietetic Registration)
supports white matter alteration may be involved in the psychopathology and
pathophysiology of these two major co-morbidities in Alzheimer’s disease. Both
FA and MD showed the differences in right cerebral peduncle, left Anterior
corona radiate, right external capsule, left inferior fronto-occipital
fasciculus, left uncinated fasciculus, right and left inferior frontal blade. The
different lateralization existed in our results. It may relate to the handedness.
In the correlation between FA values, MD values and the naming test in MoCA suggests
that WM deficits in these regions may be a specific biomarker.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Zhang B
et al. The role of diffusion tensor imaging in detecting microstructural
changes in prodromal Alzheimer's disease. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2014
Jan;20(1):3-9
2. Oishi K
et al. DTI analyses and clinical
applications in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26(Suppl
3):287-96
3. Basser et al. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and
imaging. Biophys. J.1994a;66:259–267.
4. Auning E
et al. Neurobiological correlates of
depressive symptoms in people with subjective and mild cognitive impairment. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015
Feb;131(2):139-47.
5. FMRI of the Brain Analysis Group,
Oxford University, UK, 2000
6. S.M. Smith, et al. Tract-based
spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data.
NeuroImage, 2006;31:1487-1505
7. Susumu Mori et al. Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor
imaging in an ICBM template. Neuroimage. Apr 1, 2008; 40(2): 570–582