Lan Zhu1, Xu Yan2, Cai xia Fu3, Huan Zhang1, Zilai Pan1, and Fuhua Yan1
1Radiology, Ruijin Hosptial, Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, 2MR Collaboration NE Asia, Siemens Healthcare, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, 3APPL, Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
Synopsis
The high resolution MRI and conventional
DWI suffers from unsatisfying accuracy in assessment of some prognostic factors
of rectal adenocarcinoma. We employed DKI, a protocol mainly for evaluating the
complexity of biologic tissues, to explore its diagnostic accuracy and
correlation with prognostic factors. The kurtosis of DKI exhibited highest
correlation with histologic grades especially the new grading criterion and
higher potential in differentiation of high- and low grade tumors, and also in predicting
nodal status, with higher specificity than or equivalent sensitivity to
diffusivity and ADC. In conclusion, DKI could be a promising tool in predicting
prognosis of rectal adenocarcinoma.
Introduction
High resolution magnetic resonance imaging and
diffusion imaging has been widely employed as an essential imaging tool for
accurate preoperative assessment for selecting high risk patients who could
benefit from the more aggressive multimodality treatment. However, some of
prognostic factors have to be confirmed through histopathological examination
of surgical specimens. This study aimed to assess whether DKI-derived
parameters of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma could provide more
preoperative information correlated with prognostic factors. The prognostic
factors are defined by both conventional WHO grading system and the new PDC
grading system, which has been proven to be more reproducible and
prognosis-related.
Methods
56 parents (15 women, 41men; median age 60
years) diagnosed with primary rectal adenocarcinoma by endoscopic biopsies
underwent preoperative MRI using a 1.5T MR scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens,
Erlangen, Germany) with a dedicated six-channel body coil between April 2014
and September 2015. The written informed consent had been achieved from all
patients. MRI sequences consisted of T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence
without fat saturation in sagittal, oblique axial and oblique coronal
directions and conventional DWI (b = 0, 1000 sec/mm2). Then DKI (b=
0, 700, 1400 and 2100 sec/mm2 sequence was added, and Kurtosis and
diffusion coefficients from DKI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from
conventional DWI were calculated by using an in-house
developed software based on MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, Mass).
ROI-based mean values of 3 parameters were measured by
two radiologists separately. Student t test, receiver operating characteristic
curves, and Spearman correlation were used for statistical analysis.Results
Kurtosis of high-grade rectal
adenocarcinomas was significantly higher than that of low-grade according to
PDC grades (1.136±0.086 vs 0.988±0.060, respectively; p<0.05) and WHO grades
(1.103±0.086 vs 1.034±0.103, respectively; p<0.05). In PDC grading, the
diffusivity and ADC were significantly lower in high-grade tumors than in
low-grade tumors (1.187±0.150 * 10-3 *mm2/sec vs
1.306±0.129*10-3*mm2/sec and 1.020±0.113*10-3*mm2/sec
vs 1.108±0.097 *10-3*mm2/sec, respectively; p<0.05)
and showed similar correlations with histologic grades (r=-0.486 and r=-0.406,
respectively; p>0.05). Compared to both diffusivity and ADC, kurtosis showed
significantly higher sensitivity (83.3% vs 70.8% and 70.8%, respectively) and
specificity (96.8% vs 84.4% and 81.3%, respectively). Kurtosis showed a better
correlation with PDC grades than with WHO grades (r=0.797 vs r=0.293,
respectively; p<0.05). Kurtosis was significant higher in pN1-2 than in pN0
tumors (1.086±0.103 vs 1.009±0.086, respectively; p<0.05). All parameters
manifest no significant differences in T stages, and no significant differences
between low- and high-grade tumors were found in diffusivity and ADC.Discussion & Conclusion
The histologic grade is a stage-independent
prognostic factor in rectal adenocarcinoma(2). Kurtosis in high-grade tumors
was significantly higher than in low-grade tumors and showed a significant
though weak correlation with WHO grades in our study. As we know,
microstructures of high-grade tumors have higher complexity than that of low-grade
tumors based on the WHO grading criteria. Namely, water motion in
high-WHO-grade tumors may be more restricted, resulting in more non-Gaussian
diffusion. The inhomogeneity caused by this difference might be the main reason
for the greater kurtosis in high-WHO-grade tumors in our study.
Also, kurtosis in high-PDC-grade tumors was
significantly higher than in low-PDC-grade tumors. Tumors in high PDC grades
have more poorly differentiated clusters, resulting in a greater restriction of
water motion and then higher kurtosis. In addition, a significant correlation
was found between kurtosis and PDC grades. There was an “abnormal” (extreme)
point in the G3 subgroup using the PDC grading system as shown in the Results,
which was classified as G2 according to the WHO grading criteria. A more marked
inflammatory reaction, indicating a greater decrease in hindered and restricted
water in the tumor, which resulted in less non-Gaussian properties, was
observed. Therefore, the kurtosis of the lesion was smaller than that of other
G3 rectal adenocarcinomas. We also found only the kurtosis was significantly
higher in the pN1-2 group than in the pN0 group, suggesting that it may
potentially predict patients with nodal involvement, better than ADC(3). In
conclusion, Kurtosis and diffusivity from DKI model could serve as important
prognostic parameters to aid therapy selection in patients with rectal
adenocarcinoma especially kurtosis.Acknowledgements
We hold the
honor to acquire support from the fund of Key Project of Science and Technology of Shanghai (Grant No. 16511101101) ,Major Program of the Ministry of science and technology(Grant No. 2016YFC0106802) and National Natural Science Foundation of China
(Grant No. U1532107).
References
(1)
Boras Z, Kondza G, Sisljagic V,
Busic Z, Gmajnic R, Istvanic T. Prognostic factors of local recurrence and
survival after curative rectal cancer surgery: a single institution experience.
Coll Antropol. 2012;36(4):1355-61.
(2)
Freedman L,
Macaskill P, Smith A. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for operable
rectal cancer[J]. The Lancet, 1984, 324(8405): 733-736.
(3)
Akashi
M, Nakahusa Y, Yakabe T, et al. Assessment of
aggressiveness of rectal cancer using 3-T MRI: correlation between the apparent
diffusion coefficient as a potential imaging biomarker and histologic
prognostic factors. Acta Radiol. 2014;55(5):524-31.