Sila Kurugol1, Moti Freiman1, Jeffrey Goldsmith2, Ryne Didier1, Onur Afacan1, Jeanette M Perez-Rossello1, Michael J Callahan1, Athos Bousvaros3, and Simon K Warfield1
1Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 2Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 3Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Distinguishing bowel regions with fibrosis and
regions with active inflammation would be clinically useful in Crohn’s disease
to determine best therapy. Commonly used ADC model of DW-MRI, which encapsulates multiple diffusion components
into a single parameter, may not suffice to fully describe tissue microenvironments.
IVIM model, which describes fast and slow diffusion components, is not commonly used in clinic because of challenges of reliably estimating its parameters
due to noise and physiological motion. We recently introduced a motion-compensated
spatially-constrained incoherent motion model (MC-SCIM) for reliable parameter
estimation. Here we compared MC-SCIM parameters to scores of inflammation and fibrosis from histopathology.
Purpose
To evaluate ability of fast and slow diffusion components estimated using a motion-compensated spatially-constrained intra-voxel incoherent motion model (MC-SCIM) of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) to assess fibrosis in Crohn’s disease (CD) using surgical histopathology scores.Introduction
CD
is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with
frequent relapses and remits. Intestinal
inflammation over time may progress to fibrosis and stricture formation1.
A noninvasive quantitative measurement of bowel fibrosis would be clinically
useful because the areas with stricture containing little or no fibrosis might
respond to medical therapy while areas containing substantial fibrosis will
benefit from surgery. MR Enterography (MRE) enables characterization of luminal narrowing in strictures but does not provide
measures of fibrosis1. Previous work studied DW-MRI ADC parameter
for fibrosis detection1. However, ADC model, which encapsulates the different
signal decay components into a single parameter, may not be sufficient to
fully characterize tissue microstructure. The bi-exponential intra-voxel incoherent
motion (IVIM) model2 enables the characterization of the fast and
slow diffusion components. However, reliable estimation of the IVIM
parameters is very challenging due to the inherent noise
and physiological motion. Our recently introduced technique improves IVIM parameter estimation reliability by 1) imposing a spatial
homogeneity constraint on the model parameters and 2) by jointly compensating for
motion and estimating parameters. In this work, we evaluate the ability of MC-SCIM3-5 technique for assessment of fibrosis and active inflammation in CD. We compare the parameters of slow diffusion
and perfusion fraction with histopathology scores of surgically-resected
regions.Methods
We collected 23 samples from
surgically resected bowel tissues of 7 CD patients. We labeled the locations of collected samples on the gross digital picture of the resected tissue. The
histopathology service prepared H&E stained tissue sections for evaluation.
An
experienced gastrointestinal pathologist graded the acute inflammation score (AIS) using the modified method of Borley et al.6 and the fibrosis score (FS) using the method of Chiorean et al.7 AIS and FS were graded on scales of 0-13 and 0–2, respectively. Before their surgery, patients were imaged using a standard MRE protocol including
a DW-MRI sequence with 7 b-values on a 1.5T MRI scanner. An experienced radiologist located the tissue
samples in the post-contrast T1w images of each patient. We aligned
each b=0mm2/s image and post-contrast T1w image using rigid
registration. We estimated the DW-MRI signal decay model parameters using our
recently developed MC-SCIM technique, which uses a spatial homogeneity prior and estimates parameters for all
voxels simultaneously, rather than solving for each voxel independently3,5.
It also simultaneously solves image registration and model estimation
problems by utilizing the interdependence of volumes along the
diffusion-weighting dimension4. We estimated
parameters of slow diffusion (D) associated with water molecule diffusion, fast
diffusion (D*) associated with micro-capillary perfusion, and fraction of fast
diffusion (f), associated with micro-capillary volume. We computed the average
values of D and f parameters in regions labeled by the radiologist that are matched with the histopathology samples. The parameters
were compared for regions with varying FS and AIS values.Results
Fig.1a) compares average and
standard deviation of f parameter values in regions with varying FS values. The differences of f
parameter values between regions with zero and non-zero FS were statistically
significant (p<0.01) with f being lower in fibrotic regions. Some of
those fibrotic regions also had varying amounts of AIS. Therefore, we also plotted in Fig.1b) and c) the
average values of D and f parameters respectively in regions with four possible
combinations of FS and AIS: 1) FS=0,AIS=0; 2) FS=0,AIS>0; 3) FS>0,AIS=0; 4) FS>0,AIS>0. The difference of D and f values were statistically significant (p<0.01) between category pairs labeled by * in Fig.1. Category 3 had
only one sample. The f values were higher in regions with AIS>0,FS=0 than
normal regions and lower in regions with FS>0 than normal regions (AIS=0,FS=0). Fig. 2 shows representative images from a patient, where indicated strictured
region with FS>0,AIS>0 had lower f and D compared to normal-looking
regions.Conclusions
Our results indicate that fast diffusion fraction (f) and slow diffusion (D) parameters estimated using the MC-SCIM technique are useful for
identifying regions with fibrosis and active inflammation. The estimated parameters evaluated
using the histopathology scores of fibrosis and inflammation had higher f
in regions with inflammation and lower f in regions with fibrosis indicating
reduction in microvasculature. Diffusion was restricted in regions with
fibrosis and slightly more restricted in regions with inflammation only. Distinguishing regions with fibrosis and
regions with active inflammation will be potentially useful to
deciding upon the best possible therapy, including determining whether to use
medical therapy, or surgery.Acknowledgements
This
work is supported by the National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive &
Kidney Diseases of the NIH under award R01DK100404. The content is solely the
responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official
views of the NIH.References
1. Barkmeier,
D.T., Dillman, J.R., Al-Hawary, M. et al. MR enterography-histopathology
comparison in resected pediatric small bowel Crohn disease strictures: can
imaging predict fibrosis? Pediatr Radiol (2016) 46: 498.
2. Le Bihan, D., Breton, E., Lallemand,
D., Aubin, M. L., Vignaud, J., & Laval-Jeantet, M. (1988). Separation of
diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology, 168(2),
497-505.
3. Kurugol,
S., Freiman, M., Afacan, O., Perez-Rossello, J. M., Callahan, M. J., &
Warfield, S. K. (2016). Spatially-constrained probability distribution model of
incoherent motion (SPIM) for abdominal diffusion-weighted MRI. Medical image
analysis, 32, 173-183.
4. Kurugol, S., Freiman, M., Afacan, O.,
Domachevsky, L., Perez-Rossello, J. M., Callahan, M. J., & Warfield, S. K.
(2015, October). Motion compensated abdominal diffusion weighted MRI by
simultaneous image registration and model estimation (SIR-ME). In MICCAI (pp.
501-509). Springer.
5. Freiman, M., Perez-Rossello, J. M.,
Callahan, M. J., Voss, S. D., Ecklund, K., Mulkern, R. V., & Warfield, S.
K. (2013). Reliable estimation of incoherent motion parametric maps from
diffusion-weighted MRI using fusion bootstrap moves. Medical image
analysis, 17(3), 325-33.
6. Chioran M.V., Sandrasegaran K.,
Saxena R., Maglinte D.D., Nakeeb A., Johnson C.S. (2007) Correlation of CT
enteroclysis with surgical pathology in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol
102:2541–2550.
7. Dignass A., Van Assche G., Lindsay J.O., et al. The second European
evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease:
Current management. J Crohns Colitis 2010 Feb;4:28-62.