Yuhki Hamada1, Daisuke Yoshimaru1, Yuhichi Suzuki2, Nozomi Mogi3, and Ayumu Funaki1
1Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Yachiyo, Japan, 2The University of Tokyo Hospital, 3Tokyo women's Medical University Medical Center East
Synopsis
We evaluated the relationship between the mean
kurtosis values (MK) and spleen size for the prediction of liver disease. As a
result, there was no difference between the regular spleen and spleen with
liver disease in the MK. Therefore, we consider that the splenic cell density
and inner pressure remain unchanged even if patients have the enlarged spleen
with liver diseases.
INTRODUCTION
In patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis and portal
hypertension, enlarged spleen is a common finding [1]. Recently, Diffusion
kurtosis imaging (DKI) techniques have emerged as advanced methods to evaluate
tissue microstructure in vivo using water diffusion [2]. In vivo, the diffusion
is normally restricted by tissue microstructure and show non-Gaussian phenomena
[3,4]. DKI parameters have been proved to be able to indicate
microstructural characteristics within brain [5,6]. Using this DKI analysis, we
considered that the relationship between the kurtosis value of spleen and the
spleen size could predict liver disease.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of our study was to assess the
relationship between the mean kurtosis values (MK) and spleen size for the
prediction of liver disease.METHODS
All examinations
were performed using 3.0T MR scanner (Achieva, Phillips).
1) Diffusional Kurtosis Analysis
We could use the breath hold
method for DKI acquisition because of its
short-acquisition time. Consequently, we could remove artifacts by macroscopic
physiological motions. Therefore, using the breath hold method is vital to
analyze DKI at the same slice position. K map images were generated on a voxel-by-voxel basis
with DKE software [7]. Examples of mean DKI maps
is shown in Figure 1.
2) Study population
15 healthy volunteers and 67 patients with liver
disease underwent
MRI of the spleen including DKI. Patients (n=67; 28 men and 39 women; mean age, 62.9 years; age range,
12-87 years). Volunteers
(n=15; 9 men and 6 women; mean age, 31.0 years; age range, 26-41 years).
3) Scan protocols
TR, 2500ms; TE,
58ms; Field of view, 400 ×400mm; Matrix, 80 × 80;
Slice thickness, 5mm; Slice gap, 0.5mm; SENSE factor, 2; MPG pulse, three
orthogonal directions; b values (0, 1000, 2000 s/mm2); Acquisition
time, 22s.
4) Image analyses
MK is defined as the average of the
kurtosis over all possible diffusion directions. In patients with liver diseases and healthy volunteers, regions of
interest (ROI) were always placed in the spleen center to avoid several
artifacts. The center is the slice of a larger cross-section area
in the spleen. MK were obtained by using commercially available
software (MRI cro) [8,9]. Moreover, the MK were calculated from the
mean value of 3 slices from the spleen (Fig. 2). Spleen index was defined as
the longitudinal diameter [10,11].
Enlarged spleen was
evaluated by using the spleen index of the spleen. Radiologists medically
diagnosed 15 patients of all patients as enlarged spleen.
5) Statistical analyses
All
statistical analyses were performed by using JMP (version 11.0 for Macintosh, SAS). We evaluated the
correlation between spleen size and MK of the spleen. Moreover, we evaluated
the statistical difference between 15 healthy volunteers and 15 patients with enlarged spleen. The
Spearman’s rank correlation was calculated from MK and the spleen size.
Statistical difference between patients with enlarged spleen and
healthy volunteers were assessed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.RESULTS
There were no significant correlations between spleen
size and spleen MK (ρ=-0.02
p=0.85).
In addition, there were no statistical difference in
spleen MK between healthy volunteers and patients with enlarged spleen (P>0.05.
P=0.26) (Fig. 3).DISCUSSION
In our results, there was no difference between the
regular spleen and spleen with liver disease in the MK. Therefore, we consider
that the splenic cell density and inner pressure remain unchanged even if
patients have the enlarged spleen with liver diseases. The number of patients
with enlarged spleen and healthy volunteers was low.CONCLUSION
Spleen MK is not valuable analysis to predict liver
disease.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
Klasen J, et al. Magn Reson Imaging. 2013
Sep;31(7):1092-6
Hori M, et al. Magn Reson Med Sci.
2012;11(4):221-33
Jensen JH, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2005 Jun;53(6):1432-40
Alexander DC, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2002 Aug;48(2):331-40
Raab P, et al. Radiology. 2010 Mar;254(3):876-81
Van Cauter S, et al. Radiology. 2012 May;263(2):492-501
Jensen, J.H, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2005 Jun;53(6):1432-40.
Wick W, et al. Neuro Oncol. 2008 Dec;10(6):1019-24
Mahvash M, et al. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 May;155(5):943-7
Ishibashi H, et al. J Clin Ultrasound. 1991
Jan;19(1):21-5
Torii
Y, et al. Journal of medical ultrasonics. 2005 Apr;32:375