In this study, we focused on the strictly diffusion-limited compartment with extremely low ADC. Because of the negligible signal attenuation of this compartment, the ADC of this compartment was set as zero. By adding this compartment to the two-compartment model, we presented a modified tri-exponential model. The AICcs of this model were found to be lower than the bi-exponential model and the conventional tri-exponential model, indicating this model is the best. Additionally, the parameters derived from this model, especially the fraction of the strictly diffusion-limited compartment (f0), showed potential clinical value in distinguishing the grade of malignancy of tumors.
In order to detect the real distribution of water diffusion in tissues, many models have been developed 1-3, including multi-compartment models. Both the two-compartment model and models with more compartments face many challenges 4-10. Previous studies have indicated the existence of the strictly diffusion-limited compartment with extremely low ADC in tissues and even cells 10-14. However, the existing models do not contain this compartment. The signal attenuation of this compartment is negligible at normal b-values. Hence, the ADC of this compartment could be set to zero mathematically. By adding this compartment to the two compartments model and setting the ADC of this compartment as zero, we developed a modified tri-exponential model (see equation [1]). According to our hypothesis, the strictly diffusion-limited compartment represents water molecules strictly limited in microstructures, such as intracellular organelles and myelin sheath. Hence, f0 represents the volume fraction of these microstructures. Our first study was to compare this new model with the bi-exponential model and the conventional tri-exponential model. Secondly, we also performed an initial study to apply this model in grading and differential diagnosis of gliomas.
S=S0*(f0+fslow*e-ADCslow*b+ffast*e-ADCfast*b) [1]
where f0+fslow+ffast=1, f0 is the fraction of the strictly diffusion-restricted compartment, and fslow and ffast are corresponding fractions of ADCslow and ADCfast.
1. Bennett KM, Schmainda KM, Bennett Tong R, Rowe DB, Lu H, Hyde JS. Characterization of continuously distributed cortical water diffusion rates with a stretched-exponential model. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50(4):727-734.
2. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;168(2):497-505.
3. Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53(6):1432-1440.
4. Bisdas S, Koh TS, Roder C, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of gliomas: feasibility of the method and initial results. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(10):1189-1196.
5. Koh D-M, Collins DJ, Orton MR. Intravoxel incoherent motion in body diffusion-weighted MRI: reality and challenges. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(6):1351-1361.
6. Steier R, Aradi M, Pál J, et al. A biexponential DWI study in rat brain intracellular oedema. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(8):1758-1765.
7. Schwarcz A, Bogner P, Meric P, et al. The existence of biexponential signal decay in magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging appears to be independent of compartmentalization. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51(2):278-285.
8. Lin Y, Li J, Zhang Z, et al. Comparison of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging and Arterial Spin Labeling MR Imaging in Gliomas. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015(5):234245–10.
9. Bourne R, Panagiotaki E. Limitations and Prospects for Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Prostate. Diagnostics 2016, Vol 6, Page 21. 2016;6(2):21.
10. Grant SC, Buckley DL, Gibbs S, Webb AG, Blackband SJ. MR microscopy of multicomponent diffusion in single neurons. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46(6):1107-1112.
11. Sen PN, Basser PJ. A model for diffusion in white matter in the brain. Biophys J. 2005;89(5):2927-2938. 12. Baxter GT, Frank LR. A computational model for diffusion weighted imaging of myelinated white matter. NeuroImage. 2013;75:204-212.
13. Ling X, Zhang Z, Zhao Z, et al. Investigation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient from Ultra-high b-Values in Parkinson's Disease. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(9):2593-2600.
14. Niendorf T, Dijkhuizen RM, Norris DG, van Lookeren Campagne M, Nicolay K. Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various states of brain tissue: Implications for diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36(6):847-857.
15. Lancaster JL, Andrews T, Hardies LJ, Dodd S, Fox PT. Three-pool model of white matter. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17(1):1-10.
16. Whittall KP, MacKay AL, Graeb DA, Nugent RA, Li DK, Paty DW. In vivo measurement of T2 distributions and water contents in normal human brain. Magn Reson Med. 1997;37(1):34-43.
17. Duffell D, Farber L, Chou S, Hartmann JF, Nelson E. Electron Microscopic Observations on Astrocytomas. The American Journal of Pathology. 1963;43(4):539-545.
18. Arismendi-Morillo G. Electron microscopy morphology of the mitochondrial network in gliomas and their vascular microenvironment. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. 2011;1807(6):602-608.
19. Machado CML, Zorzeto TQ, Bianco JER, et al. Ultrastructural characterization of the new NG97ht human-derived glioma cell line using two different electron microscopy technical procedures. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2009;72(4):310-316.
20. Arismendi-Morillo GJ, Castellano-Ramirez AV. Ultrastructural mitochondrial pathology in human astrocytic tumors: potentials implications pro-therapeutics strategies. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 2008;57(1):33-39.