Medetomidine sedation is a common anesthetic regimen for rodent fMRI studies. However, depth and duration of the sedation may prove insufficient for MR imaging. Adding isoflurane is an efficient way to increase depth and duration of sedation. In rats we varied the concentration of additional isoflurane (0 - 1.5 %) and performed 1D line scanning upon electric forepaw stimulation to characterize the effect of increasing isoflurane on amplitude and onset of the BOLD response. While low concentrations did not significantly alter amplitudes or onsets, we found severely reduced amplitudes and delayed onsets for higher concentrations (> 0.7 %) of isoflurane.
Female Fisher rats (n=5) were anesthetized with isoflurane (2-3 % isoflurane) and placed in the MRI scanner (9.4 T, 10 mm receive-only surface coil). Anesthesia was switched to medetomidine (bolus 0.04 mg/kg, permanent infusion of 0.05 mg/kg/h) and isoflurane was reduced (within 15 min) to 0 %. 40 minutes after bolus injection imaging experiments without isoflurane were performed. First, 2D BOLD fMRI with electric fore paw stimulation (5 s ON, 25 s OFF, 9 Hz, 1 ms-pulses, 1 mA) was performed using a GE-EPI sequence (TE = 18 ms, TR = 1 s, spatial resolution 350 x 325 µm², slice thickness 1.2 mm, 9 contiguous slices). BOLD maps were calculated to adjust slice position and width of the FOV for 1D line scanning, limited to a maximum of 2.1 mm. Frequency encoding was set perpendicular to the cortical surface (Fig. 1, TR 50 ms, TE 18 ms, flip angle 13°, FOV in frequency encoding direction 3.2-6.4 mm, resolution in frequency encoding direction 50-100 µm, acquisition bandwidth 5 kHz, 600 acquisitions, 64 repetitions, scan time 32 min). Using Matlab, a Fourier Transform was calculated along the frequency encoding direction and data were averaged across 63 repetitions (steady state signal) and across all cortical layers. Maximum BOLD amplitude of each filtered time course (low-pass filter, cut off frequency 0.475 Hz, zero-phase filtering) is reported. Measurements with BOLD amplitudes below 0.3 % or deformed responses were discarded. For the remaining scans (n=5 for 0 %, 0.2 % and 0.4 % isoflurane, n=3 for 0.7 % and 1 % isoflurane) onsets, defined as time after start of the stimulation, were determined by calculating the delay to half maximum T50 of filtered time courses and by fitting a gamma function with an explicit delay parameter T0 to the time courses2:
$$\begin{align}h(t) &= A \cdot \frac{(t-T_0)^{a-1} \cdot b^a}{\Gamma(a)} \cdot e^{-(t-T_0)b} ~~\mbox{for}~~ t\geq T_0 \\h(t) &= 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\mbox{for}~~t<T_0\end{align}$$.
Statistics are given as mean $$$\pm$$$ standard deviation and significance was assessed by Mann-Whitney U tests.
1. Yu X, Qian C, Chen D et al. Deciphering laminar-specific neural inputs with line-scanning fMRI. Nat Methods. 2014;11(1):55–58.
2. Boynton GM, Engel SA, Glover GH et al. Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1. J Neurosci. 1996;16(13):4207–4221.