David Ress1 and JungHwan Kim1
1Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
Synopsis
Brief cortical neural
activity creates changes in local blood flow and oxygen uptake. Functional
magnetic resonance imaging can measure this neurovascular coupling as a blood
oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal. The BOLD response to brief stimulation is
termed the hemodynamic response function (HRF). We developed a computational
model for the BOLD HRF, which predicts that the flow component of the HRF is a
simple underdamped sinusoid. To test this prediction, we used arterial spin
labeling to measure both CBF and BOLD responses in human cortex with high spatial
and temporal resolution. Results confirm a significant flow undershoot in five
subjects.
Purpose
In the brain, neural activity evoked by brief
stimulation creates changes in local blood flow (CBF) and oxygen uptake.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can measure this
neurovascular coupling as a blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal. The
BOLD response to brief stimulation is often termed the hemodynamic response function
(HRF). We have developed a computational model that accurately predicts both
tissue oxygen changes1, and the BOLD HRF2. The model
assumes that the CBF response of the HRF corresponds to a simple underdamped
sinusoid when measured in gray-matter parenchyma. To test this assumption, we used
arterial spin labeling (ASL) to simultaneously measure both CBF and BOLD
responses in human cortical tissue with both high spatial and temporal sampling.
We also sought to optimize methods to measure the flow component of the HRF.Methods
We measured the BOLD HRF evoked by brief
stimulation in 5 subjects. Stimulus was a 2-s presentation of 4-Hz flickering
dots colored dots accompanied by bandpass filtered white noise, followed by a 28-s
inter-stimulus interval to let the HRF evolve and subside. During the stimulus
period, the colored dots were presented sequentially at three different
locations upon the screen: left, center, or right. The dot presentations at
each location corresponded to a particular color and sound tone: red and low
pitch on the left, yellow and medium pitch in the center, green and high pitch
on the right. Sequences varied randomly from trial-to-trial (Fig. 1), and
subjects were requested to push one of three buttons corresponding the
presentation’s position, color, and pitch, while following the stimuli with
their eyes. This fairly simple but fast task was moderately challenging. fMRI
data was obtained while subjects performed this task using a 3T Siemens Trio
scanner equipped with a 32-channel head coil. Acquisition used an ASL sequence,
with either a PICORE pulsed3 or pseudo-continuous4 tagging
scheme, on 14—18 slices prescribed on a quasi-axial 192-mm FOV oriented roughly
parallel to the AC-PC line. TR was 2.5, so that alternating flow and BOLD
measurements were obtained every 5 s. We used a dithering method that varied
the timing of the stimulus in four steps to improve temporal sampling to 1.25
s. Each session produced 80—96 HRF measurements. MP-RAGE image volumes were
also obtained for each subjects, and these volumes were segmented using
FreeSurfer to delineate the gray matter. HRF results were then averaged
together only within the gray matter. We compared results produced using 2-mm
vs. 3-mm voxels, pulsed vs. pseudo-continuous tagging, and with vs. without the
use of flow-spoiling gradient lobes designed to suppress signals in larger
vessels (flow rates exceeding 6 mm/s).Results
Subjects
performed the task well, with mean accuracy of 82%. Strong HRFs were evoked
broadly across many brain regions, including portions of visual and auditory
cortices (Fig. 2). Best results were obtained using the combination of
pseudo-continuous tagging, small voxels, and flow-spoiling gradients. When
averaged over primary visual cortex, such data yielded flow HRFs that showed
reliable positive lobes followed by a reliable undershoot in all five subjects (Fig.
3). The time-to-peak of the flow response had a mean value of 4.6±0.7 s across
subjects, as compared to a mean time-to-peak of 6.1±0.9 s for the BOLD HRF. Pulsed
ASL showed a similar flow response, but with lower reliability. Removing the
flow suppression, or going to larger voxels both reduced the reliability of the
observed dynamics.Discussion
The
flow response evoked by brief brain stimulation has an undershoot, which is
consistent with our underdamped linear-network model for the flow HRF. Also the
flow response peaks earlier than the BOLD HRF, consistent with propagation
delays for the oxygenated blood to reach the parenchymal venules, the
compartment that dominates the ROLD response. Together, these results confirm
that the inertia of blood flow in the larger vessels does play a substantial
role in the dynamics of the HRF.Conclusions
The flow component of the
BOLD HRF can be accurately resolved by using dithered stimulation combined with
pseudo-continuous ASL, high-spatial resolution, gray-matter segmentation, and
large-vessel flow suppression. The observed flow HRF shows a reliable
undershoot. The ability to simultaneously measure both flow and BOLD opens up
the possibility to infer oxygen metabolism in combination with our model for
the BOLD response2.Acknowledgements
Work supported by NIH NS
R01
NS095933. HL
R21
26167539,
and NSF BCS
1063774.References
1.
J. H. Kim et al., Model of the
transient neurovascular response based on prompt arterial dilation, J Cereb
Blood Flow Metab 33, 1429—33 (2013);
Ress D et al, Front Neuroenerg 1, 1-13 (2009).
2.
J. H. Kim, D. Ress,
Arterial impulse model for the BOLD response to brief neural activation. Neuroimage
124, 394-408 (2016).
3. E. C. Wong et al.,
Implementation of Quantitative Perfusion
Imaging Techniques for Functional Brain
Mapping using Pulsed Arterial Spin Labeling NMR Biomed 10, 237-49 (1997).
4. D. J. J. Wang et al, The Value of Arterial Spin-Labeled Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke 43, 1018-24 (2012).