Richard Dylan Lawless1, Peter A. Hardy2,3, Anders Andersen3,4, and Brian Noehren5
1College of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lexington, KY, United States, 2Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States, 3Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy Center, Lexington, KY, United States, 4Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, 5Department of Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Lexington, KY, United States
Synopsis
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are associated
with a persistent decrease in quadriceps muscle strength despite
rehabilitation. Previous studies have shown that ACL injury results in muscle
disorganization, which could account for the loss in strength. We sought to use
dual-spin echo and multi-spin echo sequences to estimate T2
of the vastus lateralis in injured and uninjured limbs of twenty-two ACL
injured subjects. T2 of the injured limb was significantly longer than the
uninjured limb for both pulse sequences. Our results suggest that T2 relaxation
may provide clinicians a means to quantitatively monitor muscle recovery after
ACL injury.
Introduction
ACL
injuries are among the most common sports related injuries in the United States.1
Despite extensive rehabilitation, an ACL injury has been shown to result in a
persistent decrease in quadriceps muscle strength as well as changes in muscle
morphology. Among these changes is an expansion of the extracellular matrix and
an increase in the collagen content around the muscle fibers.2 We
sought to measure the changes in T2 estimated
from dual spin echo (DSE) and multi spin echo (MSE) MRI to quantitatively
assess changes in the vastus lateralis (VL) after tearing and reconstruction of
the ACL. The MSE sequence
produces more echoes and may give a more accurate estimation of the T2. The DSE
sequence is faster and therefore can acquire a greater volume of the VL in a
given acquisition time. If the two techniques produce equivalent results the
increased acquisition efficiency of the DSE may be preferable in clinical
practice. We hypothesized that ACL injury results in longer T2 of the quadriceps muscles of the injured
limb when compared to the contralateral limb for both the DSE and MSE pulse
sequences.Methods
Twenty-two
subjects (16M, 6F, 24±5 years old) who had either an ACL injury or ACL
reconstruction volunteered to participate in the study. All imaging was
performed on a 3.0 T, Siemens MAGNETOM Tim Trio scanner. Signal was received
through a multi-element, flexible, body array coil positioned directly over the
subject’s VL. A turbo spin echo sequence was used to acquire axial DSE (Figure 1) and MSE (Figure 2) MR images over the length of the VL. Specific parameters
for the DSE pulse sequence include TE = 12/71ms, TR = 4210ms, spatial
resolution = 1.53mm x 1.53mm, slice thickness = 6mm, matrix = 256 x 128.
Specific parameters for the MSE pulse sequence include ten equi-spaced echoes from
TE = 13.1-131.0ms, TR = 3000ms, spatial resolution = 1.53mm x 1.53mm, slice
thickness = 6mm with a 6mm gap, matrix = 128 x 128. Nineteen subjects received
the DSE pulse sequence and eight subjects received the MSE pulse sequence and
five subjects received both pulses. Approximately ten mid-muscle slices per leg
on each individual were chosen for analysis based on muscle thickness. All data
analysis was performed in Matlab (Mathworks, Nattick, MA). T2 relaxation was
estimated using non-linear, least squares regression. In the case of the MSE
images we excluded the first echo from the decay analysis because of the
different stimulated echo weighting of this image compared to the later echo
images. Results
T2 relaxation time of the VL was increased in the injured
limb in sixteen out of the twenty-two subjects. Using independent t-tests, a
significant increase in the mean T2 relaxation for the injured limb was found
in both the DSE (p=0.01) and MSE (p=0.03) scans (Figure 3). A repeated measures ANOVA showed significance with leg
as the within-subjects factor (p=0.001) and method as the grouping factor (p<<0.001).
T2 relaxation times for DSE were, on average, 11ms higher than T2 estimated
from MSE.Discussion/Conclusion
Our results suggest that T2 weighted imaging is sensitive to
the changes in quadriceps muscles resulting from ACL injury. T2 measured in the
VL using either DSE or MSE techniques demonstrated significant increase in the
ACL injured limb. We hypothesize the increase in T2 results from increased
fluid accumulation as a consequence of the development of fibrosis in the
extracellular matrix of the muscle. The MSE T2 measurements were closer to
results reported by other groups3,4 than the measurements from the
DSE scans. Additionally, the variation from subject to subject was lower in the
MSE sequence. On the other hand, the DSE sequence acquired more slices in a
shorter time. The absence of an interaction effect between image acquisition
methods suggests they are consistent in their ability to distinguish the
injured and uninjured limbs. Our results show that DSE may provide clinicians a
useful and rapid means to estimate T2 in order to identify changes to muscle
organization after ACL injury.Acknowledgements
Research reported in the publication was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health through award number K23AR062069.References
1. Mather, I.I.I.R.C., et al., Societal and Economic Impact of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears. The
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2013. 95(19): p. 1751-1759.
2. Hasson, C. J., et al. Contractile and non-contractile tissue volume and distribution in ankle
muscles of young and older adults. J Biomech, 2011 44(12): p.
2299-2306.
3. Chang G., et al. Biochemical and Physiological MR Imaging of Skeletal Muscle at 7 Tesla
and Above. Seminars in
musculoskeletal radiology. 2010 14(2).
4. Arpan, I., et al., T2 mapping provides multiple approaches to characterize muscle
involvement in neuromuscular diseases: a cross-sectional study of lower leg
muscles in 5-15 year old boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. NMR
Biomed., 2013 26(3): p. 320-328.