Han Sang Lee1, Helen Hong2, Young Cheol Yoon3, and Junmo Kim1
1School of Electrical Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of, 2Dept. of Software Convergence, Seoul Women's University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 3Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
We propose a multi-atlas
segmentation method for the knee cartilage in T2 PD MR images using sequential multi-atlas
registrations and locally-weighted voting (LWV). To select training atlases
similar to the test image, a 2D projection image-based atlas selection method
is proposed. Then, to extract a bone model to be used as registration target in
cartilage segmentation, the bone is segmented by sequential multi-atlas
registrations and LWV. Finally, to segment a cartilage without leakage into
low-contrast surroundings, the cartilage is segmented by bone-mask-based cartilage
registration and shape-constrained LWV with distance and structure similarity
weights, as well as atlas similarity weight.
Purpose
Knee
cartilage is a soft tissue in knee joint which plays an important role in maintaining
its stability. Quantitative assessment of cartilage morphometry in MR images
has been used as an important tool for a number of clinical tasks including
diagnosis, disease tracking, and treatment planning of osteoarthritis (OA).
However, the segmentation of cartilage is known to be challenging due to (1)
its thin plate-like shape and variation in it, (2) the low contrast
surroundings, e.g. synovial fluid (Fig. 1), and (3) adjacency between femoral
and tibial cartilages. To overcome the challenges, we propose an automated
segmentation of cartilage from knee MR images using sequential multi-atlas registration
and shape-constrained locally-weighted voting (LWV).Methods
3D T2 PD VISTA coronal
knee joint MRI scans were acquired for fourteen normal subjects, using Philips
Achieva 3.0T system with a repetition time (TR) of 1600ms, an echo time (TE) of
32.69ms, a resolution of 512x512, a slice number of 250, a pixel size of 0.31mm
x 0.31mm, and a slice thickness of 0.5mm. To construct the training atlases,
bones and cartilages for all MRI scans were manually segmented by three
experts. For each test image, the bone and cartilage were segmented by the
proposed method consisting of three main steps (Fig. 2). First, an atlas
selection is performed to reduce the computation time and registration error in
multi-atlas registration. In atlas selection, the training atlases similar to
the test image are selected by registering and comparing slab average
projection images (SAPI) instead of 3D scans. Second, the bone was segmented by
2-stage sequential registrations1 and LWV with atlas similarity
weight.2 Bone was first roughly segmented by volume-based 3D affine
registration and LWV, and then refined by object-based 3D affine registration,
and LWV. Third, the cartilage was segmented by bone-mask-based 3D affine
registration and shape-constrained LWV. To reduce the registration error and to
enhance the robustness to the cartilage shape variability, the cartilage masks
of the training images were registered to the test image using 3D affine
registration between bone masks. In addition to conventional atlas similarity
weight, two additional shape-constrained weights, distance similarity and
structure similarity, for LWV were proposed to reduce the leakage into low
contrast surroundings in cartilage segmentation. A distance similarity weight
weighs the distance between each voxel and bone surface, based on the fact that
the cartilage is thin plate stuck on the bone surface. A structure similarity
weight emphasizes the structural similarity between the registered training
cartilage masks and the test cartilage mask based on structural tensor,
especially the measurement of plate-likeliness.3Results
In evaluation, two
comparative methods, with (1) the conventional volumetric bone and cartilage
registration and globally-weighted voting (GWV), and (2) the sequential
registrations and GWV, were compared with the proposed method in qualitative
and quantitative assessment. (Figs. 3, 4) Experiments were cross-validated with
leave-one-out method. In qualitative assessment, it can be observed that the
proposed method reduced misaligned segmentation compared to Volume+GWV with the
help of sequential registrations. It can also be observed that the proposed
method avoided the leakage into low-contrast surroundings compared to
Sequential+GWV, thanks to shape-constrained LWV. In quantitative assessment,
the proposed and comparative methods were assessed with the manual segmentation
using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), volume overlap error (VOE), and volume
difference (VD),4 as shown in Fig. 5. It can be observed that the
proposed method outperformed the comparative methods by achieving the DSC, VOE,
and VD of 68.9±8.1%, 46.9±9.0%, and -7.5±19.0%, respectively.Discussion
In our method, the
proposed sequential multi-atlas registration reduced the misalignment between
the training atlases and the target image without using non-rigid registration
techniques. Our shape-constrained LWV enabled our method to avoid the leakage
into low contrast surroundings. As a result, our method enabled the
segmentation to be robust to the cartilage shape variability, and to prevent
the leakage into low contrast surroundings.Conclusion
We have developed an
automated cartilage segmentation method in knee MR images using sequential multi-atlas
registration and shape-constrained LWV. Our method can be applied to quantitative
assessment of cartilage morphometry for various OA-related tasks, including
cartilage loss tracking for OA diagnosis and 3D print model estimation for
reconstruction surgery.Acknowledgements
Our work was supported by grants of Samsung
Electronics Digital Media and Communications R&D center, and the Ministry
of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MISP), Korea, under the National Program
for Excellence in SW (R7116-16-1018) supervised by the Institute for Information
& Communications Technology Promotion (IITP).References
1. Lee H.S., Kim H.A., Kim
H., Hong H., Yoon Y.C., Kim J. Multi-atlas segmentation of the cartilage in
knee MR images with sequential volume- and bone-mask-based registrations. SPIE
Med. Img. 2016.
2. Lee,
J-G., Gumus, S., Moon, C.H., Kwoh, C.K., and Bae, K.T. Fully automated
segmentation of cartilage from the MR images of knee using a multi-atlas and local
structural analysis method. Medical Physics 2014; 41(092303): 1-10.
3. Lee,
J.-G., Kim, J.H., Kim, S.H., Park, H.S., and Choi, B.I. A straightforward
approach to computer-aided polyp detection using a polyp-specific volumetric
feature in CT colonography. Comput. Biol. Med. 2011; 41(9): 790-801.
4. Heimann, T.,
Morrison, B., Styner, M., Niethammer, M., and Warfield, S. Segmentation of knee
images: A grad challenge. Proc. MICCAI Works. Med. Img. Anal. Clinic, 2010.