Qinlin Yu1,2,3,4, Huiying Kang1,5, Qinmu Peng1,2, Minhui Ouyang1,2, Michelle Slinger1,2, Yun Peng5, Fang Fang3,4, and Hao Huang1,2
1Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 3School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China, 4Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Science, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China, 5Department of Radiology, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
Synopsis
The brain development in
the first several years after birth is perhaps most dynamic. However, the
studies on white matter maturation of infants and toddlers with relatively
evenly distributed ages in 0-3 years are rare. Here, we charted white matter
development in subjects 0-3 years-of-age through measurements of DTI-derived
metrics at the tract level and tract-group level. A 3-stage maturational
pattern was revealed for all white matter tracts. The differentiated maturation
among the white matter tracts and tract groups was found using DTI measurements.
Purpose
The brain development in
the first several years after birth is perhaps most dynamic. The existing
studies on white matter maturation in infants and toddlers are limited by few
discrete time points [1] and by small sample size with DTI data that is
acquired across different sites [2]. The studies on white matter maturation in
the period of 0-3 years with relatively evenly distributed ages are rare. In
this study, we aimed to quantitatively delineate the maturational processes of white
matter tracts and tract groups for infants and toddlers, ages 0-3 years.Methods
Subjects and data acquisition: 68 infants and toddlers (37 females, age range
from 2.0 to 37.2 months) were recruited. Diffusion MRI was acquired from a 3T Philips
Achieva system using a single-shot EPI sequence. The dMRI imaging parameters
were: TE = 100 ms, TR = 9300 ms, in-plane field of view = 256 x 256 mm2,
in-plane imaging resolution = 128 x 128 mm2, slice thickness = 2 mm,
slice number = 70, 30 independent diffusion encoding directions, b-value = 1000
sec/mm2, repetition = 2. Microstructural
maturation of white matter tracts and tract groups: A digital white
matter atlas JHU ICBM-DTI-81 (cmrm.med.jhmi.edu/) was used to parcellate white
matter tracts and tract groups. Nonlinear registration, skeletonization and
projection steps from TBSS from FSL (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/TBSS) were used to map the atlas labels to the white
matter skeleton in the averaged FA maps in the atlas space, as shown in Fig. 1.
The single-subject template used for nonlinear registration process in TBSS was
identical to the template used for establishing the ICBM-DTI-81 atlas. Each
skeleton voxel was categorized in one of the major tracts and one of the five
tract groups: commissural, projection, brainstem, limbic and association tract
group. Details of these procedures can be found in the literature [3]. The FA
threshold at the white matter skeleton is 0.25 to keep only deep white matter
with continuous skeleton voxels (shown in Fig 1b). Curve fitting: Average values of FA for each tract and tract
group at the white matter skeleton and the subject ages were used for exponential
fitting: FA = a•exp(-b•age) +
c. To quantify developmental rates, three developmental sub-periods in 0-3
years were identified using the time points corresponding to the highest FA
values. The top 1/9 and 1/3 of the highest FA values in the fitting curve were
used as separation points, similar to the approach used in the literature [4]. In
each sub-period, linear fitting was conducted for each tract and tract group to
delineate the characteristic rapid-to-slow maturation of the white matter
tracts. Results
Rapid-to-slow maturation: With genu of corpus callosum (GCC) as a
representative white matter tract, exponential curve fits best for the
cross-sectional age-related increases of FA measurements (Fig 2). In the three sub-periods
during the age of 0-3 years, FA measurements increase rapidly initially, then slow
down and reach a stage with plateaued maturation (Fig 2). Differentiated maturation of white matter tracts and tract groups:
Distinctive FA developmental trajectories among the tracts and tract groups are
shown in Fig 3 and Fig 4, respectively. FA values of the commissural tracts in
the entire age range of 0-3 years are much higher than other tracts such as the
superior longitudinal fasciculus (Fig 3). Fig 4 shows that the rate of FA
increase of the commissural tract group is also much larger than other tract
groups, while the rate of FA increase of limbic and association tract groups
appear to be the smallest. Fig. 5 shows the timing and magnitude of maturational
rate in all measured tract groups. The quantified FA maturational rate clearly
reveals that the maturation in association and limbic tract groups develop more
slowly than that of the commissural, projection and brainstem tract groups.Discussion and conclusion
The developmental period of 0-3 years is characterized by
rapid-to-steady maturation for all white matter tracts and tract groups. The
maturation in association and limbic tract groups develop more slowly than
commissural, projection and brainstem tract groups. With relatively
limited diffusion MRI data of infants and toddlers with evenly distributed
cross-sectional ages, the present study on differentiated white matter
maturation in the age of 0-3 years fills the knowledge gap of
understanding white matter maturation from birth to adulthood. Among the white matter
tracts, the
FA values of commissural tracts increase faster than other tract groups. The quantitative
white matter maturational trajectories of the normal developing brain will
provide reference standards for “pre-“diagnostic risk assessment, filling a gap
towards precision health for infants and toddlers.Acknowledgements
This study is funded by NIH MH092535, MH092535-S1 and HD086984.References
[1] Geng et al. (2012) NeuroImage 61: 542.
[2] Hermoye et al. (2006) NeuroImage 29: 493.
[3] Ouyang et al. (2016) HBM 37: 819.
[4] Lebel et al. (2008) NeuroImage 40: 1044.