Tianye Zhai1, Hong Gu1, and Yihong Yang1
1Neuroimaging Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
TMS
targeting the DLPFC has been shown to effectively manipulate inter-temporal
behaviors in healthy individuals and drug-using behaviors in cocaine users.
However, the neural mechanism through which the DLPFC is involved in the
alteration of these behaviors remains unclear. In the current study, we utilized
resting-state fMRI to investigate the relationship between the DLPFC functional
connectivity and relapse in cocaine addiction. Our voxel-wise Cox
regression analyses revealed that two DLPFC circuits have protective effects against
cocaine relapse.
Introduction
Neurobiological
and neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that the dorsal lateral prefrontal
cortex (DLPFC), a major component of the executive control network, is crucial
in modulating top-down control and regulating decision-making 1,2. Transcranial
magnetic stimulation (TMS) targeting the DLPFC has been shown to effectively manipulate
inter-temporal behaviors in healthy individuals 3 and drug-using
behaviors in cocaine users 4. However, the neural mechanism through
which the DLPFC is involved in the alteration of these behaviors remains unclear.
In this study, we utilized resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) to investigate the relationship
between the DLPFC functional connectivity (FC) and relapse in cocaine
addiction.Methods
Forty-five
cocaine use disorder (CUD) patients and 22 healthy control (HC) subjects participated
in this study. The CUD participants underwent one of three residential
cocaine-dependence treatment programs that utilized the Minnesota Model psychosocial
treatment approach. Urine drug screens were conducted throughout the residential
treatment to verify abstinence. The CUD participants were followed for 168 days
post-treatment or until relapse to stimulant use. The study was approved by the
Institutional Review Boards and written informed consent of each subject was
obtained prior to the study 5. Resting-state fMRI data were obtained on a
Philips 3T scanner using a GE-EPI sequence (TE/TR=25/1700 ms, 212 volumes). The
rs-fMRI datasets were analyzed with AFNI, SPM8 and Matlab. Slice timing
correction, head motion correction, white matter, CSF signal removal were
performed. The necessity of global signal removal was determined individually by
evaluating global negative index of each subject 6. Band-pass filter
was used to keep low-frequency fluctuation between 0.012-0.1Hz. The datasets
were then normalized to standard MNI space and resampled to isotropical 2mm. The
seed ROI located on the left DLPFC was selected in accordance with literature 4.
The cross-correlation coefficient map of each subject was generated by correlating
time course of each voxel with that of the seed. After applying Fisher’s
Z-transformation, the datasets of HC subjects were used to generate a pattern
with significant FC to the seed which served as a mask for following analyses. Then
we utilized a customized Matlab program to conduct relapse prediction based on the
Cox regression model, in a voxel-wise fashion, to generate the relative hazard
ratio (HR) map. Age, gender, years of education and mean head movement during
the scan were served as covariates in the Cox regression analysis. To further
evaluate the potential ability of the Cox model in predicting relapse at an
individual level, we also performed the leave-one-out (LOO) cross validation. All
analyses were thresholded at the rigorous p=0.001
and Monte-Carlo simulation implemented with 3dclustsim
program of AFNI was used to correct for multiple comparisons. To evaluate the
prediction power of the above analyses, we conducted receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) analyses and calculated the area under curve (AUC) of the
ROC of each voxel to generate the AUC maps.Results
The
voxel-wise Cox regression analysis revealed that two regions in the left DLPFC
and left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) survived the statistical threshold and
both had HR values < 1 (Fig.1). Individuals with higher connectivity between
these regions and the seed had lower relative relapse HR (or longer abstinence
following the treatment), suggesting protective effects of the connectivity of
these brain circuits against relapse. Fig. 2 shows the result of the ROC
analyses for both without and with the LOO analyses of these two regions. AUCs
of the ROC curves are ranging from 0.82~0.96 for the left DLPFC (Fig.2B left), and
from 0.85~0.99 for the left IFG (Fig.2B right) without LOO. With the LOO cross-validation,
the AUC ranges dropped to 0.72~0.89 for the left DLPFC (Fig.2C left) and
0.76~0.91 for the left IFG (Fig.2C right). Discussion and Conclusion
Emerging
concepts based on neuroimaging studies suggest that cognitive behaviors were
supported by neural networks connected among discrete brain regions 7.
The observed regions in the current study (the DLPFC and IFG) that serve as a protective
factor against relapse are in accordance with principle of TMS with long-term
potentiation effects that stimulating the target could lead to a momentary
elevation of the BOLD signal in the directly stimulated area, as well as regions
monosynaptically connected to the stimulated site 8,9. These
findings may serve as the neural mechanism of the effective manipulation of the
behavioral outcome by TMS targeting the DLPFC, and extend our understanding of
the neural underpinnings of the high relapse in addiction. The approach used in
the study may have the potential to guide informed treatment such as evaluating
the effectiveness of the stimulus site in TMS treatment.Acknowledgements
The
research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIDA. We
thank Dr. Bryon Adinoff for providing data on cocaine users.References
1. Hare et al. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation
of the vmPFC valuation system, Science. 2009;324(5927):
646-648.
2. Baumgartner et al. Dorsolateral and ventromedial
prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice, Nature neuroscience. 2011;14(11):
1468-1474.
3. Figner et al. Lateral prefrontal
cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice, Nature neuroscience. 2010;13(5):
538-539.
4. Terraneo et al. Transcranial magnetic
stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reduces cocaine use: A pilot
study, European Neuropsychopharmacology.
2016;26(1): 37-44.
5. Adinoff et al. Basal hippocampal
acivity and its functional connectivity predicts cocaine relapse, Biological Psychiatry. 2015;78(7): 496-504.
6. Chen et al. A Method to Determine the
Necessity for Global Signal Regression in Resting-State fMRI Studies, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2012;68(6):
1828-1835.
7.
Mesulam, M. Defining neurocognitive networks in the BOLD new world of computed
connectivity, Neuron. 2009;62(1): 1-3.
8. Hanlon et al. Mobilization of Medial
and Lateral Frontal-Striatal Circuits in Cocaine Users and Controls: An
Interleaved TMS/BOLD Functional Connectivity Study, Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 (Epub ahead of print).
9. Bestmann et al. On the
synchronization of transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional echo-planar
imaging, Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Imaging. 2003;17(3): 309-316.