1200

Extended Hybrid-SENSE: off-resonance and eddy corrected joint blip up/down reconstruction with reduced g-factor penalty
Benjamin Zahneisen1, Murat Aksoy1, Julian Maclaren1, Christian Wuerslin1, and Roland Bammer1

1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States

Synopsis

Geometric distortions caused by off-resonant spins are a major issue in EPI based functional and diffusion imaging. We present a novel approach to the problem of geometric distortions. An extension of the model-based, algebraic hybrid-SENSE reconstruction method in combination with a known fieldmap, calculated from blip up/down scans, allows for correction of off-resonance effects during the reconstruction. This enables a joint blip up/down reconstruction that significantly reduces g-factor penalty if the blip-down trajectory is chosen to fill in missing k-space samples from the blip-up scan. The resulting high SNR images are automatically eddy-current corrected and geometric distortions are minimized.

Introduction

Geometric distortions caused by off-resonant spins are a major issue in EPI-based functional and diffusion imaging. Typically, correction methods use an off-resonance map and operate as a post-processing step on the magnitude images. A robust method to measure off-resonance maps is the blip up/down approach, where the polarity of the 2nd readout is inverted (2). Brain regions that are compressed in the blip-up acquisitions are stretched in the blip-down case and vice versa. From that, FSL’s topup implementation calculates the off-resonance map.

We present a novel two-stage approach to correct for geometric distortions that makes use of the blip up/down concept. First, we propose an extension of the model-based, algebraic hybrid-SENSE reconstruction method (1) that allows correction for off-resonance effects. For accelerated scans (SMS and/or in-plane) we then employ hybrid-SENSE for a joint blip up/down reconstruction where we choose the sampling pattern of the blip-down trajectory (Figure 4) such that it partly fills in missing k-space samples. A joint reconstruction not only benefits from signal averaging but also from reduced g-factor penalty because the effective acceleration factor is reduced.

Theory

Ignoring off-resonance effects along the readout, and performing an FT along the $$$k_x$$$ domain, transforms the k-space data $$$s_0(k_x,k_y,k_z)$$$ to an hybrid space $$$ s(x,k_y,k_z) $$$. For every position $$$ x=x_n$$$ we can write the signal equation (forward model) in matrix notation as $${\bf s=Fm} \hspace{10mm} [1]$$ with the unknown magnetization $$$ {\bf m} \in \mathbb{C}^{N_yN_x \times 1} $$$ and the signal vector $$$ {\bf s} \in \mathbb{C}^{N_sN_c \times 1} $$$ that consists of all $$$N_s$$$ acquired ky-kz k-space samples times the number of receiver coils $$$N_c$$$. The effective encoding matrix $$$ \bf F= C \circ E \circ W \circ R $$$ with $$${ \bf C,E,W,R} \in \mathbb{C}^{N_s N_c \times N_y N_z} $$$ is the Hadamard product of the individual matrices that model the encoding process where: $$$\bf C$$$=coil sensitivity variation, $$$\bf E$$$=gradient encoding from$$$k_y$$$ and $$$k_z$$$-space, $$$\bf W$$$=off-resonance effects, and $$$\bf R$$$=intensity variations. In order to invert the rectangular matrix $$$\bf F$$$, we use a truncated singular value decomposition approach (TSVD) (3) where eigenvalues below a certain threshold $$$\lambda$$$ are completely suppressed (Figures 1,2). The solution is then given as $$ {\bf m = F}_{pinv}^{TSVD} {\bf s} \hspace{10mm} [2] $$

For the joint blip up/down reconstruction we rewrite the signal model as $${\bf F_{\uparrow \downarrow}}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{\bf F_{\uparrow}}\\ {\bf F_{\downarrow}}\end{array}\right) \hspace{10mm} [3]$$ where $$$\bf F_{\uparrow}$$$ and $$$\bf F_{\downarrow}$$$ are the effective encoding matrices for the blip up$$$(\uparrow)$$$ and down$$$(\downarrow)$$$ trajectories. The g-factor map is calculated as $$ g(x_n,y,z)=diag(\sqrt{\frac{{\bf F}_{pinv}^{TSVD}({\bf F}_{pinv}^{TSVD})^T}{{\bf C C}^T} })/\sqrt{R_{tot}} \hspace{10mm} [4]$$

where $$${\bf C C}^T$$$ corresponds to a SENSE reconstruction with R=1.

Methods

All measurements were performed at 3T using a 32-channel head coil. Reconstructions were performed off-line using MatLab. The “blip down”-EPI acquisition is implemented by inverting the phase encoding gradients while keeping all other parameters unchanged. The fieldmap was estimated using FSL5.0’s topup (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) with default parameters (4). For the joint reconstruction we employed a MUSE-like correction for phase inconsistencies between segments (5) and the workflow is displayed in Figure 5. The following parameters were used for blip up/down acquisitions with varying SMS and in-plane accelerations Ry: FOV=22x22cm, NxxNy=128x128, CAIPI blip-factor=2; partial Fourier=0.75, esp=0.55ms, slice thickness=2mm, TR=3s.

Results

Figure 3 displays one reconstructed multi-band group (SMS-factor=4,Ry=1) for blip-up (a) and blip-down (b). From these two the fieldmap in c is derived and used in the off-resonance-corrected hybrid-SENSE reconstructions for blip-up (d) and -down (e). Figure 4 demonstrates the g-factor penalty reduction for the joint reconstruction of diffusion weighted (b=2000) acquisitions (SMS-factor=4, Ry=2). The off-resonance corrected blip-up reconstruction (red samples in d) is shown in a and the corresponding g-factor map for a total acceleration factor of Rtot=8 is displayed in c. Sum-of-squares combination of separate blip-up and -down reconstructions is displayed in b. Sum-of-squares combination does not affect the g-factor map from c. The joint blip up/down reconstruction (red and blue samples in d) in e has higher SNR than blip-up or sum-of-squares-combination. The corresponding g-factor map for Rtot=4 is shown in f.

Discussion

Modelling off-resonances in an algebraic reconstruction framework results in images with significantly reduced geometric distortions. We have shown that regularization is important for regions where local off-resonance gradients oppose the gradients from k-space encoding (Figure 2). Acquiring blip-up/down scans for each diffusion direction allows for highly accurate estimation of dynamic off-resonances and eddy-current contributions. The longer scan time is more than compensated by the SNR increase due to averaging, the g-factor penalty reduction and the improved image quality.

Acknowledgements

NIH (2R01 EB002711 , 5R01 EB008706, 5R01 EB011654), the Center of Advanced MR Technology at Stanford (P41 RR009784), Lucas Foundation.

References

1. Andersson JLR, Skare S, Ashburner J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage [Internet] 2003;20:870–888. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7. 2. Zhu K, Dougherty R, Wu H, Middione M, Takahashi A, Zhang T, Pauly J, Kerr A. Hybrid-Space SENSE Reconstruction for Simultaneous Multi-Slice MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging [Internet] 2016. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2531635. 3. Hansen PC. Truncated Singular Value Decomposition Solutions to Discrete Ill-Posed Problems with Ill-Determined Numerical Rank. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. [Internet] 1990;11:503–518. doi: 10.1137/0911028. 4. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051. 5. Chen N-K, Guidon A, Chang H-C, Song AW. A robust multi-shot scan strategy for high-resolution diffusion weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE). Neuroimage [Internet] 2013;72:41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.038.

Figures

Figure 1: Off-resonance corrected algebraic reconstruction. a) off-resonance map in [Hz]. b) profile of the fieldmap along y at x=xn. c) complex phase of encoding matrix corresponding to Cartesian sampling. d) temporally and spatially varying phase contributions due to off-resonance profile from b. e) distorted encoding matrix is the hadamard product of c and d. f) reconstruction based on c. g) reconstruction using distorted encoding matrix.

Figure 2: Ill-posed reconstruction problem. a) fieldmap for axial slice. b) gradient field of a along the y-direction (AP). c) nominal k-space trajectory (blue) is plotted together with positive (green) and negative (red) contribution from off-resonance gradients. Incomplete refocusing occurs when the local gradient counterbalances the nominal trajectory. d and e) Unregularized, off-resonance corrected reconstructions with exploding signal intensity corresponding to the highlighted regions in b. f and g) regularized truncated SVD reconstruction does not lead to instabilities.

Figure 3: Demonstration of off-resonance corrected reconstruction for mb-factor = 4. a and b) Reconstruction of one SMS-group with opposing geometric distortions for blip up/down. c) corresponding fieldmap. d and e) off-resonance corrected reconstructions for blip up and down.

Figure 4: G-factor penalty reduction by joint blip up/down reconstruction for b=2000. a) Blip up reconstruction only. b) Sum-of-squares combination of blip up and blip down reconstruction. c) noise enhancement for Rtot =8. d) K-space sampling pattern with interleaved blip up/down acquisition. e) Joint blip up/down reconstruction. f) noise enhancement for joint reconstruction with Rtot=4, relativ to full 3D multi-band k-space.

Figure 5: Workflow. The blip up/down acquisitions are reconstructed separately and an initial fieldmap is derived using FSL’s topup. With the final static fieldmap all diffusion directions are reconstructed for blip up and down. From that an eddy current map is estimated and the MUSE phase difference map is calculated by complex division. Finally, the joint blip up/down reconstruction is performed with all available k-space and coil sensitivity information and diffusion direction dependent eddy correction and phase difference maps.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017)
1200