Hendrik Paysen1, Katharina Paul1, Michal Pham1, Lukas Winter1, and Thoralf Niendorf1,2,3
1Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany, 2Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany, 3MRI.TOOLS GmbH, Berlin, Germany
Synopsis
Proton resonance
frequency (PRF) shift is the most common MR thermometry (MRTh) technique for
water based tissue. For adipose tissue MRTh exploits the temperature dependent
relaxation times T1 and T2. Hybrid methods that allow
simultaneous acquisition of water and fat based thermometry are of great
clinical need. Recognizing this need this work investigates a hybrid
temperature mapping technique, designated as 2in1-Thermometry, which combines
simultaneous PRF and T2-based temperature mapping using simultaneous dual contrast weighting with
double echo RARE imaging.
Purpose
MR-Thermometry
(MRTh) is key for guidance and supervision of thermal therapies1-3
and beneficial for monitoring and improving MR safety4-5. Proton
resonance frequency (PRF) shift is commonly used for MRTh of aqueous tissue. For
MRTh of adipose tissue temperature dependence of T1 and T26-7
relaxation times is exploited. Hybrid methods that allow simultaneous
acquisition of water and fat based thermometry are of great clinical need8.
Recognizing this need this work proposes a hybrid temperature mapping technique,
designated as 2in1-Thermometry, which combines simultaneous PRF and T2-based
temperature mapping using simultaneous
dual contrast weighting with double echo RARE imaging. 2in1-Thermometry
is carefully validated in phantom heating experiments and benchmarked against conventional
gradient echo (GRE) based PRF thermometry. Preliminary results of RARE based ΔT2
thermometry in bovine suet are validated
against fiber optic temperature sensor readings.Methods
2in1-RARE imaging
supports two contrasts in one acquisition by independent sensitization of stimulated
echoes (STE) and spin echoes (SE)9. For PRF-MRTh an
evolution time
is
incorporated between the initial excitation and the first refocusing pulse to
generate T2*-weighting for the SE magnetization10. The
STE-image is not affected by this evolution time and is acquired for two TEs permitting
simultaneous T2-based MRTh assuming a mono-exponential T2-decay
for fatty tissue11 (Fig.1c). Radiofrequency (RF) heating was
performed at f=300MHz using a bow tie dipole-antenna fed with an external RF-power
amplifier12 (Fig.1b). MR images were acquired at 3.0T13. To
examine the fidelity of PRF-MRTh of 2in1-RARE, heating experiments were
performed in phantoms and benchmarked against GRE based PRF. For this purpose a
uniform agarose phantom was heated four times for three minutes (Pavg=70W
at the antenna). B0-drift correction was performed using oil samples placed
around the phantom. To study the feasibility of T2 based MRTh,
heating experiments of fatty tissue were performed using conventional RARE and
split-echo RARE11,14 as a precursor of 2in1-RARE. For
this purpose an agarose phantom including an insert containing bovine suet was
heated for 6x6min (Pavg=70W at the antenna). Before heating and
directly after each heating period RARE and split-echo RARE were performed to
calculate a ΔT2-map based on a mono-exponential decay (TE1=17ms,
TE2=52ms). Temperature maps were calculated based on T2 changes
versus the reference image. MR-temperature maps were compared to measurements
of fiber optic sensors15 placed inside the phantom.Results
PRF temperature maps
calculated from 2in1-RARE and GRE are shown in Fig.2. The match between the
maps demonstrates the feasibility of PRF based thermometry of 2in1-RARE using a
slightly longer acquisition time to ensure a similar SNR. The temperature rise
over time is displayed in Fig.3 for one fiber optic sensor position. The
difference between the fiber optics data and the MR based temperature averaged
in a region of interest (ROI) around the sensor position was defined as the
accuracy (dT) of
the temperature mapping technique. These accuracies were averaged for all four sensor
positions and all MR measurements for a final accuracy of dT=(0.5±0.2)°C for GRE
based PRF-MRTh and dT=(0.6±0.2)°C
for 2in1-RARE based PRF-MRTh. The temperature dependent ΔT2
measurements of split-echo RARE in bovine suet tissue were comparable to ΔT2
values acquired using RARE (Fig.4). In comparison to fiber optic sensor readings
in the bovine suet sample, RARE based temperature dependent ΔT2
changes showed a linear dependency with ΔT changes11 (Fig.4d). Discussion
The
presented data demonstrate that 2in1-RARE based PRF thermometry is feasible and
supports a temperature mapping fidelity competitive with GRE based PRF-MRTh. To
take our developments to the next level the presented preliminary T2
based thermometry for RARE and spilt-echo RARE will be incorporated into
2in1-RARE. However the echo separation in 2in1-RARE leads to signal dephasing
affected not only by T2 dephasing and consequently smaller T2
changes compared to RARE are presumed. A T2 preparation module16
will be added to the 2in1-RARE sequence and is expected to produce similar results
to RARE and split-echo RARE, which showed good linearity (ΔT2/ΔT) as
compared to fiber optic readings. The proposed 2in1-RARE-MRTh is especially
beneficial for temperature monitoring applications where the traditional gradient
echo and echo planar imaging based approaches are compromised bysusceptibility
artifacts and image distortion. For the proposed 2in1-RARE-MRTh approach
temperature sensitization can be varied from zero, which is not feasible with
conventional gradient echo based PRF-MRTh.Conclusion
A spin echo
based pulse sequence - 2in1-RARE thermometry – was presented that offers the potential
to simultaneously acquire two images with different contrasts (T2*
and T2). This enables the simultaneous calculation of temperature
maps in adipose and water-based tissue which is a remaining challenge for GRE
based thermometry.Acknowledgements
This
work was supported in part (L.W., T.N.) by the German
Federal Ministry of Education and Research, “KMU-innovativ”: Medizintechnik
13GW0102.References
1 Quesson B, De Zwart J and Moonen CTW,
JMRI, 2000. 12(4):525-533
2 Moonen CTW, Medica Mundi, 2000.
44:34-42
3 Wust P, et al., Lancet Oncol, 2002. 3(8):487-497
4 Murbach M, et al., MRM, 2014. 71(1):421-31
5 Van Rhoon GC, et al., Eur Radiol,
2013. 23(8):2215-27
6 Rieke V and Pauly KB, JMRI, 2008. 27:376-390
7 Winter L, et al., Int J Hyperthermia,
2015. 32(1):63-75
8 Todd N, et al., MRM, 2014. 72(3):793-9
9 Fuchs K, et al., MRM, 2014. 72(6):1590-8
10 Streicher MN, et al., MRM, 2014. 71(2):524-533
11 Baron P, et al., MRM, 2014.
72(4):1057-1064
12 Winter L, et al., Radiat Oncol, 2015.
10(1):201
13 Verio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany
14 Schick F, MRM, 1997. 38(4):638-644
15 Omniflex, Neoptix, Québec, Canada
16 Brittain JH, MRM, 1995. 33(5):689-696